In an increasingly global and competitive environment, an organization’s long‐term survival may depend on improved quality, productivity and customer service. The pressing need to improve competitiveness has resulted in a number of transnational and national quality awards. In broad terms, these awards stress the importance of management process, customer satisfaction, people and total quality to the attainment of superior competitive position. Describes, compares and highlights the key strengths and weaknesses of the following four major national and transnational quality awards: the Deming Application Prize; the European Quality Award (EQA); the Malcolm Baldrige Quality Award (Baldrige Award); and the Australian Quality Award (AQA). Discusses the key requirements of each award and their underlying assumptions and impacts. The awards reviewed represent one of the principal devices used to encourage adoption of self‐assessment, total quality concepts, and external focus in four different continents. To spread good total quality practice the awards publicly recognize the achievements of the organizations which have successfully adopted the concepts of total quality management. The winners serve as useful role models for other organizations intent on adopting total quality management practices. The quality awards reviewed are arguably the premier award in their respective continents.
Article navigation
1 March 1996
Review Article|
March 01 1996
Characteristics, benefits and shortcomings of four major quality awards Available to Purchase
Abby Ghobadian;
Abby Ghobadian
Centre for Interdisciplinary Strategic Management Research, Middlesex University Business School, London
Search for other works by this author on:
Hong Seng Woo
Hong Seng Woo
Centre for Interdisciplinary Strategic Management Research, Middlesex University Business School, London
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6682
Print ISSN: 0265-671X
© MCB UP Limited
1996
International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management (1996) 13 (2): 10–44.
Citation
Ghobadian A, Seng Woo H (1996), "Characteristics, benefits and shortcomings of four major quality awards". International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 13 No. 2 pp. 10–44, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/02656719610109999
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Taking on the world
Total Quality Management (March,1992)
Managing excellence: leadership
The TQM Magazine (August,1999)
ICL High Performance Technology: winner of the 1995 UK Quality Award
Managing Service Quality: An International Journal (August,1996)
Benchmarking critical factors for TQM: part II – empirical results from different regions in the world
Benchmarking for Quality Management & Technology (June,1995)
Something for nothing? A comparison of practice and performance in vulnerable and promising companies
Integrated Manufacturing Systems (May,2002)
Related Chapters
Introduction
Effective Procurement of Ground Investigation
Defining World-Class Care in Academic Medicine: Enablers and Challenges
International Best Practices in Health Care Management
Societal Entrepreneurship and Competitiveness
Societal Entrepreneurship and Competitiveness
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
