Focuses on one of the most widely used service quality measurement scales, SERVQUAL, and looks at some of the areas of concern which have recently been raised regarding its viability as a comprehensive measurement tool for the service industry as a whole. While acknowledging the significant contribution that this model has made, it is suggested that it does not go far enough ‐ the dimensions of SERVQUAL do not adequately address some of the more critical issues associated with the assessment of individual services. Having carried out citation analyses of both the 1985 and 1988 versions of SERVQUAL, it can be shown that although there is a plethora of published work in the marketing and retail sectors about its applicability, relatively little empirical work has been carried out in other service sectors. Indeed, more than one‐quarter of all published papers where SERVQUAL was a major theme, appear to have severe reservations about this scale. In place of the SERVQUAL scale, a model which takes the form of a hierarchical structure ‐ based on three main levels of attributes ‐ pivotal, core, and peripheral (P‐C‐P) is proposed. This P‐C‐P model has the ability to span any service sector since what is proposed is a skeletal framework within which to consider respective services. The authors are currently in the process of using this model for the empirical analysis of the quality of information which is provided by government bodies to the business community. The results of their empirical study will form the subject matter of the next paper in this series. This is, therefore, largely theoretical in nature with the emphasis on a critical appraisal of the existing models in the service quality arena and it also describes the authors’ own model to encourage discussion and debate among researchers, perhaps allowing them to make further refinements to their proposed model.
Article navigation
1 April 1997
Research Article|
April 01 1997
The measurement of service quality: a new P‐C‐P attributes model
George Philip;
George Philip
Management and Information Systems Division, School of Management, The Queen’s University of Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Shirley‐Ann Hazlett
Shirley‐Ann Hazlett
Management and Information Systems Division, School of Management, The Queen’s University of Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6682
Print ISSN: 0265-671X
© MCB UP Limited
1997
International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management (1997) 14 (3): 260–286.
Citation
Philip G, Hazlett S (1997), "The measurement of service quality: a new P‐C‐P attributes model". International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 14 No. 3 pp. 260–286, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/02656719710165482
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
The perceived service quality concept – a mistake?
Managing Service Quality: An International Journal (June,2001)
Conveying Service Quality Through Advertising
Journal of Services Marketing (April,1992)
The role of expectations in the perception of health care quality: developing a conceptual model
Int J Health Care Qual Assur (June,1997)
Company Study: Quality for Value‐added Perceptions and Bottom‐line Results
Journal of Services Marketing (April,1992)
Survey timing and consumer perceptions of service quality: an overview of empirical evidence
Managing Service Quality: An International Journal (June,2001)
Related Chapters
A Gender Gap in Executive Cash Compensation in Thailand: A View of the Expectancy Theory
Global Corporate Governance
Manifesting Change: Developing Change Agents in a Digitalised World
Contemporary Approaches in Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: Strategic and Technological Perspectives
Efficiency as a Domain of Health Care Systems: A Phenomenographic Approach
Annual Review of Health Care Management: Strategy and Policy Perspectives on Reforming Health Systems
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
