International comparisons of contractor performance allow contractors in different countries to benchmark their own strengths and weaknesses and improve their competitiveness accordingly. Based on a survey of contractors in Japan, the UK and the USA, contractor quality performance is evaluated and compared. It is found that Japanese contractors complete their construction projects with fewer defects, provide longer defects liability periods and are called upon fewer times during the defects liability period than their UK and US counterparts. UK and US contractors do seek more regular feedback from their clients than Japanese contractors and generally similar levels of client satisfaction are achieved in the three countries (based on quality performance). The somewhat superior performance of Japanese contractors may be attributed to their deep‐rooted quality consciousness, closer working relationships with their subcontractors, and more advanced total quality management systems and quality assurance procedures.
Article navigation
1 September 2002
Review Article|
September 01 2002
The performance of contractors in Japan, the UK and the USA: An evaluation of construction quality
Hong Xiao;
Hong Xiao
Built Environment Research Unit, School of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
David Proverbs
David Proverbs
Built Environment Research Unit, School of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6682
Print ISSN: 0265-671X
© MCB UP Limited
2002
International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management (2002) 19 (6): 672–687.
Citation
Xiao H, Proverbs D (2002), "The performance of contractors in Japan, the UK and the USA: An evaluation of construction quality". International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 19 No. 6 pp. 672–687, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710210429564
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Sustaining quality in the UK public sector: Quality measurement frameworks
International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management (August,2002)
Quality in higher education: from monitoring to management
Quality Assurance in Education (March,2003)
EVALUATING TQM: IS IT WORTH IT?
Management Development Review (June,1993)
The journey to steps to six sigma …
Handbook of Business Strategy (December,2004)
Clearing up the confusion
Total Quality Management (March,1992)
Related Chapters
New Trends in the Nonprofit Sector in Europe: The Emergence of Social Enterprises
Accountability and Social Accounting for Social and Non-Profit Organizations
Value distribution in state-owned firms: The case of two companies in Uruguay
Performance Measurement and Management Control: Behavioral Implications and Human Actions
Public Value as Performance: Politicians’ and Managers’ Perspectives on the Importance of Budgetary, Accruals and Non-Financial Information
Public Value Management, Measurement and Reporting
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
