Skip to Main Content
Article navigation
Purpose

The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of knowledge management practices (KMP) in enhancing educational infrastructure (EI), human resource development (HRD) and institutional performance (IP) in higher education institutions. Additionally, it aims to examine how institutional support (IS) and technological readiness (TR) moderate these relationships. By addressing these objectives, the study seeks to provide actionable insights for policymakers and institutional leaders to optimize knowledge management strategies, strengthen educational systems and improve human resource capabilities within the context of higher education.

Design/methodology/approach

This study employs a quantitative research design to examine the impact of KMP on EI, HRD and IP in higher education institutions. Data were collected from 200 participants, including lecturers, administrative staff and academic leaders, using structured questionnaires. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was applied to analyze the relationships between variables, with IS and TR as moderating factors. The design ensures the reliability and validity of measures, while robust statistical techniques provide insights into the interplay between KMP, IS, TR, EI, HRD and IP.

Findings

The findings reveal that KMP significantly enhances EI, HRD and IP in higher education institutions. IS and TR were found to positively moderate these relationships. Specifically, IS strengthens the impact of KMP on EI, HRD and IP, while TR further enhances these connections, emphasizing the importance of supportive environments and technological readiness. These results underscore the critical role of KMP, IS and TR in driving institutional success and advancing educational infrastructure and workforce development.

Research limitations/implications

This study has several limitations. First, the sample was limited to higher education institutions in Indonesia, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other regions or educational systems. Second, the research relied on self-reported data from lecturers, administrative staff, and academic leaders, which could introduce bias. Third, the study did not explore the long-term effects of KMP on educational outcomes, as it focused on immediate impacts. Lastly, the study did not account for potential cultural or contextual differences that may influence the relationship between KMP, institutional support, and technological readiness.

Practical implications

The findings of this study have several practical implications for higher education institutions. By emphasizing the importance of KMP, IS and TR, the study provides insights for administrators and policymakers aiming to enhance EI and HRD. Institutions should focus on fostering a supportive environment and ensuring technological readiness to maximize the effectiveness of KMP. Additionally, the study highlights the need for strategic planning and investment in staff training, which are essential for improving institutional performance and achieving sustainable growth in higher education.

Social implications

The social implications of this study highlight the role of KMP in fostering a collaborative and knowledge-sharing culture within higher education. By strengthening educational infrastructure and human resource development, KMP can contribute to improving the quality of education and teaching practices. This, in turn, benefits students, faculty and the broader community by enhancing educational outcomes and promoting equitable access to quality learning experiences. Furthermore, the findings emphasize the importance of institutional support and technological readiness in creating an inclusive, future-ready educational environment that addresses societal needs and advances social equity.

Originality/value

This study offers a unique contribution by exploring the moderating roles of institutional support and technological readiness in the relationship between KMP, EI and HRD in higher education. While previous research has focused on the direct effects of KMP, this study extends knowledge by examining how these external factors influence the outcomes of KMP. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers and educational leaders in Indonesia and beyond, helping to optimize the implementation of KMP to strengthen higher education institutions and improve their organizational performance and educational outcomes.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal