Skip to Main Content
Article navigation

Scholars in the areas of economics and educational administration have in recent years examined the relationship between educational cost and school size. One distinguishing characteristic of such studies has been the choice of a school or a school district as the unit of analysis. Another is the overwhelming choice of a parabolic function to describe the cost‐size relationship. This study examines the question whether the unit of analysis should be a specific program of study (such as mathematics or social studies), utilizing data collected from Michigan secondary schools for the school year 1971–1972. The data are also used to check whether a hyperbolic relationship between school size and costs provides a better statistical fit to the data. The Michigan data encompass both secondary academic and vocational programs.

This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal