An analysis of decision‐making procedures and managerial styles of department heads in an academic institution is used to test the contingency model of managerial leadership. The procedures and styles of thirty academic heads are compared with those reported in other studies of managers in private enterprises and public bureaucracies. In both the academic and non‐academic situations, decisions and styles range over autocratic, participatory and delegative approaches. Evidence is put forward that the academic heads are, on average, as effective as managers in the other sectors but that they tend to use participatory and power‐sharing procedures more than their counterparts in private industry and public service. The contingency theory of managerial leadership seems therefore to be supported by this study.
Article navigation
1 January 1979
Review Article|
January 01 1979
PARTICIPATION IN DECISION‐MAKING Available to Purchase
N.F. DUFTY;
N.F. DUFTY
Dean of Social Sciences at the Western Australian Institute of Technology. He holds the degrees of B.A., M.Ed. and PH.D. (W.A.) and M.A. (Ill.). Dr. Dufty was a Visiting Scholar at Stanford University in 1978.
Search for other works by this author on:
J.G. WILLIAMS
J.G. WILLIAMS
Co‐ordinator of Graduate Studies, School of Business and Administration, Western Australian Institute of Technology. He holds the degrees or B.A., B.Sc. and Ph.D. (W.A.), B.Ed. (Qld.) and M.Ed. (Alta.). Dr. Williams is currently investigating aspects of Principals' behaviour in West Australian schools.
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7395
Print ISSN: 0957-8234
© MCB UP Limited
1979
Journal of Educational Administration (1979) 17 (1): 30–38.
Citation
DUFTY N, WILLIAMS J (1979), "PARTICIPATION IN DECISION‐MAKING". Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 17 No. 1 pp. 30–38, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb009803
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
STYLES OF LEADERSHIP AND DECISION MAKING: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PROFESSIONAL AND BUSINESS LEADERS
Management Research News (July,1990)
Humble and autocratic leadership in daily work life: associations with discrete emotions and helping behavior
Journal of Managerial Psychology (April,2026)
Leadership Styles: How Important are Cultural Values? An Analysis of Managers in the Asia‐Pacific Region
Management Research News (October,1996)
Contrasting effects of leadership styles on public service motivation: the mediating role of basic psychological needs among Indian public sector officials
International Journal of Public Sector Management (July,2022)
From resistance to acceptance: the dynamics of educators’ intentions to use chatbots and the role of educators’ autocratic behaviour
Asian Education and Development Studies (May,2025)
Related Chapters
The development of the five mini-theories of self-determination theory: an historical overview, emerging trends, and future directions
The Decade Ahead: Theoretical Perspectives on Motivation and Achievement
Corporate Social Responsibility in Cyberspace: Selling out to Autocratic Regimes: Implications from the Case of Google Corporation in China
Principles and Strategies to Balance Ethical, Social and Environmental Concerns with Corporate Requirements
Crisscrossing War and Peace, Democracy and Autocracy Viewed Through an Environmental Lens
Scars of War: Migration, Security and Sustainable Future
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
