Skip to Main Content
Article navigation

Argues that theory in educational administration is not theoretical but, rather, descriptions of ideological perspectives. This argument is tied to patterns of thinking which are revealed in the theory debate and in the descriptive statements of theory. It is proposed that these patterns of thinking possess an identifiable, psychological mechanism called a personal construct and this may provide a way for theorists in educational administration to avoid continuing the theory debate as if there were opposing paradigms. The proposition that theory in educational administration constitutes the theorists′ personal perspectives, based on ethical choices, is followed with some suggestions as to how theorizing may proceed and, in so doing, avoid relying on a moral philosophy when attempting to understand administrative behaviour.

You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal