The major purpose is to provide a philosophic basis for the study and practice of educational administration. An explicit assumption is that logical, propositional thought is a desirable prelude to action. Reason, which is defined as an organic harmony of impulses, is related to administration via three levels of discourse: 1) philosophic values (WHY), 2) hypothetico‐deductive theory (HOW), and 3) observed behavior (WHAT). The first level is defined by the discursive thought of the moral philosopher Santayana. His definition of rational ethics provides a foundation for administrative‐organizational theory in general, and the concept of bureaucracy in particular. The second level includes Weber's pure‐type structural model that has rationality as its dominant characteristic. The third level, administrative practice, or praxeology, is portrayed as a derivative of rational thought. Current approaches, including systems analysis and program budgeting, are rooted in the union of the logic of Santayana's ethics and Weber's structural model for human groupings.
Article navigation
1 January 1969
Review Article|
January 01 1969
Santayanan—Weberian Reason in Administration
HARRY J. HARTLEY
HARRY J. HARTLEY
Head of the Division of Educational Administration and Supervision, New York University. He is a member of the American Economic Association, Phi Delta Kappa and the Society for General Systems Theory. Dr. Hartley holds the degrees of B.A., M.A. and Ed.D.. He is the author of numerous publications including Educational Planning—Programming—Budgeting: A Systems Approach. (Prentice‐Hall, 1968).. (Prentice‐Hall, 1968.)
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7395
Print ISSN: 0957-8234
© MCB UP Limited
1969
Journal of Educational Administration (1969) 7 (1): 45–56.
Citation
HARTLEY HJ (1969), "Santayanan—Weberian Reason in Administration". Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 7 No. 1 pp. 45–56, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb009631
Download citation file:
128
Views
Suggested Reading
The modern Weberian thesis: a short review of the literature
Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy (June,2007)
Rethinking relationships in governing: some Weberian distinctions
Journal of Management History (Archive) (March,1996)
Mangi teus‐teus: Between a Weberian and historical understanding of economic dominance among pious Muslims in francophone West Africa
Journal of Islamic Marketing (September,2010)
Was Weber right? The cultural capital root of socio-economic growth examined in five European countries
International Journal of Manpower (May,2014)
Post‐bureaucracy and Weber's “modern” bureaucrat
Journal of Organizational Change Management (January,2006)
Related Chapters
Chapter 2 Theory in Weberian Marxism: Patterns of Critical Social Theory in Lukács and Habermas
The Vitality Of Critical Theory
Santayana: Entering into the Drama of his Social Thought
Blue Ribbon Papers: Interactionism: The Emerging Landscape
The Building of the Scandinavian States: Establishing Weberian Bureaucracy and Curbing Corruption from the Mid-Seventeenth to the End of the Nineteenth Century
Bureaucracy and Society in Transition: Comparative Perspectives
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
