Skip to Main Content
Purpose

This paper aims to evaluate the construction supply chain (CSC) by examining its relationships with various key areas and its development, identifying gaps and outlining potential future research directions that affect the implementation of CSC standards during the timeframe of the United Nations’ “Decade of Action” plans in the past two decades.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper reports on a systematic literature review with bibliometric analysis that investigates publications from around the world on various aspects of CSC. These aspects include research methodology/data collection technique, inquiry mode, country-specific research, focused areas of study, the research aims and publication periods.

Findings

The findings of the study reveal that information technology, information sharing, collaboration, performance measurement and CSC configuration have received considerable attention and analysis. However, financial management, supply chain resilience, logistics, vendor managed inventory and rural CSC have been identified as significant areas that require further investigation since limited attention has been given to them in the existing literature.

Research limitations/implications

CSC is a very dominant topic in the current study, but there are some limitations to it. Scopus and Web of Science databases were used to conduct the study. A future study can therefore consider papers related to other databases. As the focus was specifically dedicated to construction material SC only, the papers associated with SCs of labours and equipment have been eradicated.

Originality/value

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first structured and systematic literature review that identifies the issues related to the CSC during the timeframe of the United Nations’ “Decade of Action” plans and proposes future research directions to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of CSC.

A vision of sustainability, development and economic growth was outlined in the United Nations’ “Decade of Action” plan in 2000 to achieve the highest number of outputs in industries, innovations and infrastructure with economic growth. In 2010 and 2020, it has been continued as the next phase of the plan (Decade of Action, 2020). Economic growth is typically measured by the annual percentage change in gross domestic product (GDP) (Henderson et al., 2011). The construction industry is a significant contributor to the GDP of most nations and is continuously growing (Onat and Kucukvar, 2020). Therefore, many countries seriously promote their construction sector for rapid economic development (Darko et al., 2019; Enshassi, 2000). The construction industry in the USA, the United Kingdom, Japan, India and China represents approximately half the global construction output (World Bank, 2011). While developed economies like the United Kingdom, the USA and Japan have recently increased their focus on the construction sector, developing economies like India and China are rapidly catching up (Marsh, 2021). The construction industry provides significant employment opportunities for both skilled and unskilled labour, particularly for daily wage labourers, and is the second-largest employer in many developing nations (Farooqui et al., 2018; Goel et al., 2019). Despite this, the construction sector faces several challenges, such as poor coordination among project stakeholders, fragmented raw material supplies and poor traceability, resulting in delays, wastage and quality issues (Mohd Nawi et al., 2014), making the construction industry complex and underperforming (Yeo and Ning, 2006). To address these challenges, modern management practices such as supply chain management (SCM) can be used to make construction a continuous and project-based industry, ensuring the timely completion of projects and client satisfaction (Eriksson, 2010).

Although the application of SCM practices was introduced in the construction industry in the late 1980s (Vrijhoef and Koskela, 2000), the combined approach of SCM in construction, referred to as Construction Supply Chain Management (CSCM), gained the momentum in the mid-2000s (Abas et al., 2020). The CSCM offers operational, strategic and tactical planning in the construction project to achieve a better relationship with stakeholders and high operating efficiency (O’Brien et al., 2008). The CSCM also reinforces the construction sector through effective communication, collaboration, integration and coordination among all stakeholders (Segerstedt and Olofsson, 2010). The major challenge for the CSCM is to understand the system due to its complex, fragmented and dynamic nature (Cheng et al., 2010). Thus, developed nations have identified the different perspectives and challenges of CSCM to make it more responsive (Chen et al., 2020), while the developing nations have confined research concerning the CSCM (Abas et al., 2020; Singh et al., 2022). Many remarkable literature reviews in the construction industry over the past year have improved resource use and client service, including decision-making, performance enhancement, risk assessment, outsourcing and partnerships (Le et al., 2020).

There are a few issues with CSCM practices raised by various construction organisations in developing nations, including incorrect forecasting of raw materials and improper storage of fragile construction materials like bricks, glass and tiles (Gunarathne et al., 2021). The studies related to CSCM practices are in a nascent stage and need to be properly analysed and discussed from a supply perspective. Hence, there is an urgent need for a comprehensive and systematic review of the status to ensure the appropriateness of the CSC (Chen et al., 2020).

The study addresses the following research questions:

RQ1.

How has the academic literature addressed the intersection of materials in CSC and the construction industry?

RQ2.

What are the main emerging research topics in this area, and how are they interconnected?

RQ3.

What are the critical areas where improvements are required in the construction industry?

In CSC, materials and equipment related to construction are produced, transported and used, while manpower is appointed on a permanent or contractual basis. The CSC starts with the three parallel echelons, namely, material supplier, manpower/labour contractor and manufacturer of equipment, and ends at the client (user) to meet a need through a particular delivery channel; these are said to be types of CSC as shown in Figure 1. The implementation of CSC offers total SC profitability through the quality of transformative ideas, increasingly advanced with modern tools and techniques, which involve all three SC flows (material, information and cash) between upstream members and downstream members (Ha and Krishnan, 2008).

Figure 1.

Types of SCs in the construction industry

Figure 1.

Types of SCs in the construction industry

Close modal

A systematic review is a methodical and structured approach to reviewing the literature on a specific subject instead of conventional or narrative reviews (Dixit et al., 2019; Kumar and Singh, 2022). It involves a comprehensive and systematic search of relevant literature and a critical appraisal and synthesis of the evidence. Systematic reviews are designed to minimise bias and provide a transparent and reproducible process for synthesising the evidence on a specific research question.

2.2.1 Data-collection.

The data for this study were collected through an extensive literature review process. The Scopus and Web of Science databases were used to identify high-quality research articles related to the topic. Using three primary keywords, namely “construction supply chain”, “supply chain in construction” and “supply chain in civil”, a total of 124 significant and relevant research papers published between 2000 and 2020 were selected for analysis.

2.2.2 Data-selection.

124 significant and relevant research papers were downloaded in a year-wise format with the help of Mendeley’s software. Many papers were found with the keyword “construction supply chain”. After the primary phase of the search of the papers from 2000 to 2020, 78 research papers were finalised. In the present study, the major attention was dedicated to the materials in CSC. At the same time, the papers associated with the labour SC and equipment SC have been eradicated (as mentioned in the PRISMA framework, Figure 1). Figure 2 shows the complete systematic literature review process with a downward flow diagram, and Table 1 shows the overall criteria for data collection and selection.

Table 1.

Data collection and data selection criteria

CriteriaInclusionExclusionReliability
Data sourceReliable databases: SCOPUS and WoSUnreliable source(s)Ensure academic requirements and reliability of the source material
Data typePapers published in prestigious peer-reviewed journals and international conferencesEditorial papers, professional guidelines, assessment reportsEase of validation for material’s reliability
Publication periodFrom 2000 to 2020Out of periodIncludes all CSC changes and updates
KeywordsPapers, book chapters and articles mentioned described and analysed the keywords’ contentArticles only mentioned the keywordsAssurance of articles’ content in terms of reliability and suitability
Source: Authors’ own work
Figure 2.

Systematic literature review process

Figure 2.

Systematic literature review process

Close modal

A critical analysis of all the selected data are presented in this section, along with some of its findings and discussion, which are classified under different aspects:

Papers are sorted into three types, i.e.:

  • Empirical: Empirical research refers to the collection of comprehensive data, author perspectives and fundamental information to formulate and validate theories through experimentation and testing;

  • Case study: A case study is a detailed account of real-life experiences and contributions within a specific group or industry; and

  • Literature review: A literature review is an extensive and systematic analysis of the existing body of literature on construction project management that explores different approaches and perspectives while considering the various stages of development in the field.

Different authors incorporated various research methodologies into their research papers. Figure 3 shows that 60.2% of papers are related to empirical studies. Different authors incorporated various research methodologies into their research papers, and many authors proposed a selection of new methodologies to foster various aspects of CSC. Figure 3 also discloses that very few papers were performed on literature reviews on CSC (approximately 6%), while case study holds the second position with 30.7% of research papers.

Figure 3.

Research methodologies in CSC

Figure 3.

Research methodologies in CSC

Close modal

Figure 4 shows that research work on CSC by authors across various nations is completed in developed nations, developing nations and under-developing nations. It is noticed that most of the studies originated from UK, China and USA. The works from developing nations like India and China focus on their agility, overall performance measurement, accessibility, etc., while the least researchers focused on CSC in rural areas. Researchers from developed nations such as UK, Sweden and USA are focusing on the various techniques associated with problems of CSC, such as information technology (IT), logistics, tracking, information sharing (IS) and costing (Briscoe and Dainty, 2005).

Figure 4.

The number of authors of publications across various countries

Figure 4.

The number of authors of publications across various countries

Close modal

The systematic review of the literature is also explained by the appropriate inquiry mode in which data are collected, analysed and interpreted. The inquiry mode recommends researchers’ suitable methodology and techniques. Based on the inquiry mode analysis, papers on CSC are classified into three types. i.e.:

  • Qualitative research: It is a deliberate and purposeful approach aimed at obtaining critical data for a specific sector, institution or event rather than collecting superficial explanations based on the general population;

  • Quantitative research: Quantitative research is a systematic and practical study of social phenomena using statistical, mathematical or computational methods; and

  • Mixed research: Mixed-methods research is a strategic research approach that involves collecting, analysing and integrating both qualitative and quantitative data to understand research topics from multiple perspectives.

Figure 5 shows these classifications in a bar graph manner, and the exact reference of papers is shown in Table 3. Researchers’ focus is seen to be qualitative research, followed by quantitative research; 35 papers are qualitative, 30 papers are quantitative and 13 papers are mentioned mixed research (both qualitative and quantitative) out of 78 research papers. Both qualitative and quantitative content analysis are approached to support each other to achieve effective research results.

Table 3.

Distribution of literature based on research aim and data collection method

Author(s)Research typeResearch aimMethodology type
Golpîra (2020) EmpiricalDevelop an original integer mixed linear programming to integrate VMI strategy into common problems of multi-project and multi-resource CCS network design with minimum costQuantitative
Getuli et al. (2016) EmpiricalMonitor the construction activities with the help of cloud computing and BIMQuantitative
Xie et al. (2010) Case studyInvestigate how constructive design in CS partnerships could be improved by communication issuesQualitative
Love et al. (2002) Case studyExamine the advantages of long-term strategic alliancesQualitative
Tamošaitiene et al. (2017) EmpiricalInvestigate the inherent interconnectivity of the processesQualitative
Zhou et al. (2019) EmpiricalIdentify the suitable strategy to implement prefab houses in rural areasQuantitative
Cheng et al. (2010) EmpiricalExamine the role of flexible coordination of CSC by Web technologyQuantitative
Shin et al. (2011) EmpiricalDevelop an integrated information management framework that could provide stakeholders with logistical information for decision-makingQuantitative
Kim and Nguyen (2018b) EmpiricalExplore the relational characteristics of the CSC and their impact on performanceQualitative
Xue et al. (2005) EmpiricalFinding problems in SC to solve these problems and improve build performance, an agent-based framework for coordinating SC build is designed based on the technology of agents and multi-attribute negotiation and multi-attribute utility theoryQualitative
Kim and Nguyen (2018a) EmpiricalEvaluate CSC Relationships by an AHP FrameworkQualitative
Wang et al. (2007b) Case studyPresents a combined fundamental method of selecting partners by value assessment and performance evaluationQualitative
Naim and Barlow (2003) EmpiricalExplore the lean and agile SC strategy for customised housingQuantitative
Das et al. (2015) EmpiricalClassifying stream information with long the CSC and integrating SCs into a centralised collaboration systemQuantitative
Demiralp et al. (2012) Case studyExplore the approaches to solve the problems by RFID in the construction sectorMixed
Bajpai et al. (2016) EmpiricalIdentify issues for slowing down road construction and aids SC reconfiguration and reorganisationQualitative
Ahmed et al. (2020) EmpiricalAssess the barriers and opportunities faced by green SCM in the construction sector of developing nationsQuantitative
Shemov et al. (2020) Case studyEmphasise the role of blockchain as a possible solution to CSC’s challenges, regardless of the risks associated with the security and robustness of information flows and privacyCase study
Thunberg and Fredriksson (2018) EmpiricalExplore how to explain the relationship between common issues in CSC and how to deal with them through proper planningQualitative
Saini et al. (2019) EmpiricalInvestigate potential challenges that impede the effective transmission and sharing of tacit knowledgeQualitative
Meng (2013) EmpiricalInvestigate the changes in UK construction by SC collaborationQualitative
Briscoe et al. (2004) EmpiricalInvestigate the client’s role in ensuring a higher level of SC integrationQuantitative
Xue et al. (2011) EmpiricalMeasure the value of IS across various inventory policies to improve the management of CSC materials and equipmentQuantitative
Pan et al. (2011) Case studyDevelop performance assessment methods to help improve Management in CSCQualitative
Briscoe and Dainty (2005) Case studyMeasure the issues encountered to combine SCs into UK enterprise and contexts of the SC control partneringQuantitative
Briscoe et al. (2001) Case studyExamines the skills required for an effective SC partnership in the UK construction industryQualitative
Davis (2008) EmpiricalEstablish the influence of relational variables on CSCs.Quantitative
Wang et al. (2007a) EmpiricalDevelop an RFID-based dynamic SC management system (MConRDSCM) for mobile construction to improve the efficiency and economy of project management and improve practical communication between stakeholders, delivery time and project responseQuantitative
Fernie and Thorpe (2007) EmpiricalExplore the changes in CSCMQualitative
Ofori (2000) EmpiricalExplores the possibility of applying SCM to mainstream Singapore’s construction process, thereby addressing pressing issues, including the weaknesses of the environmentQualitative
Ismail (2020) EmpiricalExamine the role of a hybrid intelligent vehicle system for CSCM in the precast concrete buildingQuantitative
Chen et al. (2020) Case studyIdentify the enablers for coordination across CSC processesQualitative
Ekanayake et al. (2020) EmpiricalExamines how SCR can be enhanced through defining relevant and relevant SC capabilities (SCCs) that companies build. It should then be maintained and/or further developedQuantitative
Seth et al. (2018) Case studyFocuses on the SC of a large scale that illustrates the role of competitiveness and supplier profile and its influence on supplier evaluation based on supply and condition. Current market conditionsQualitative
Pala et al. (2016) Case studyImplement the commercial information exchange on CSCQualitative
Bag et al. (2018) Case studyMeasure the effect of the adoption of Industry 4.0 and SC sustainabilityQualitative
Edum-Fotwe et al. (2001) EmpiricalIdentify the information procurement practices of key actors in CSCQualitative
Yildiz and Ahi (2020) case studyDevelop an innovative decision support model for CSC performance management using a variety of methodologiesQuantitative
Irizarry et al. (2013) EmpiricalInvestigate the role of BIM and GIS integration in improving CSCM visual monitoringQuantitative
Ding et al. (2015) EmpiricalExplore the key factors for the adoption of BIM in construction drawings by architectsQualitative
Cox and Ireland (2002) EmpiricalDevelop a theoretical framework to understand the industry structure and its composition, buyer attributes and supplier power; the appropriateness of a particular relationship depends on the position of the company’s power in CSCQualitative
Titus and Bröchner (2005) Case studyProvide a better understanding of construction procurement and information flow model development in the SCM frameworkQuantitative
Motawa and Kaka (2009) EmpiricalIntroduce a computer system designed to model various payment mechanisms so that SC stakeholders can determine the appropriate payment mechanismQuantitative
Tennant and Fernie (2013) EmpiricalExamine current organisational theory and practice in UK CSCQuantitative
Le et al. (2020) Literature reviewExplore the future direction of decision-making in CSCMMixed
Zhai et al. (2017) EmpiricalDescribe a coordination scheme to solve production lead time hedging (PLTH) coverage issues in prefabricated SCMQuantitative
Khalfan et al. (2001) EmpiricalImprove the concurrent engineering deployment plans to conduct a preparatory assessment of the organisation and its SC participants to determine willingness to adopt competitive engineering techniquesQualitative
Kumaraswamy et al. (2000) EmpiricalShows the aspects of choice in CSC optimisationQuantitative
Duryan and Smyth (2019) EmpiricalExplore the functional feature for knowledge management between projects and stakeholders within an organisation, with customer and customer’s SC service design at the program levelMixed
Hatmoko and Scott (2010) EmpiricalDevelop a model for quantifying the impact of CSC delays on the performanceQuantitative
Ebrahimy et al. (2011) EmpiricalDevelop a simulation model that can capture complex variables that affect the productivity of tunnelling projectsMixed
Al-Bazi and Dawood (2012) Case studyDevelop an innovative team allocation system that could efficiently assign groups of workers to iterative and labour-intensive processesQuantitative
Romagnoli et al. (2019) Literature reviewA detailed review of the Wood SC from forest to end consumption pointMixed
Yan and Zhangong1)Case studyExamines the main issues of implementing this IT-based LCSCM model, including building node businesses in lean SCs and establishing linkages in lean procurement SC between partiesQualitative
Briscoe et al. (2004) Case studyHighlights the subcontractor concerns lead to fundamental mistrust and scepticism in existing relationships in the SCQualitative
Neeraja et al. (2014) Case studyHighlights the importance of logistics in SC in present-day business developmentQualitative
Albaloushi and Skitmore (2008) EmpiricalExplore the SCM in the UAE Construction industryMixed
Park et al. (2011) EmpiricalDevelop an SCM model for ready-mixed concreteMixed
Čuš-Babič et al. (2014) Case studyExplain how to make CSC more transparent by using IT/ISMixed
Zainal Abidin and Ingirige (2018) EmpiricalInvestigate this dynamic by assessing critical vulnerabilities and the ability of SC to shape resilience in managing disruption events in projectsQualitative
Wang and Shi (2019) EmpiricalPromote knowledge sharing based on the monitoring mechanism among member companies of Industrial CSCMixed
Vidalakis et al. (2011a) EmpiricalImprove the understanding of CSC by examining the applicability of construction work and production valuation from the perspective of construction logistics and by examining the logistics capabilities of merchantsQuantitative
Aloini et al. (2012) Literature reviewInvestigation of risk factors influencing the implementation of SCM principlesQualitative
Broft et al. (2016) EmpiricalExpand existing discussions by adopting an alternative approach that focuses specifically on the internal SCM organisations of the main subcontractors and their interrelationshipsQuantitative
Feng et al. (2018) EmpiricalOptimise the global equilibrium in constructionQualitative
Love et al. (2004) EmpiricalInvestigate the implementation of management in CSCQuantitative
Manikandan et al. (2020) Case studyFocuses on sustainable business practices in CSCQuantitative
Wibowo and Sholeh (2015) Case studyMeasure the performance of the SC using the SC Operations References modelQuantitative
Vrijhoef and Koskela (2000) EmpiricalClarify the role and potential of management in CSCQualitative
Bäckstrand and Fredriksson (2020) MixedBrings knowledge about coordination within the CSC and how lack of information can affect the operationsMixed
Barker et al. (2000) EmpiricalAssess individual business processes and whole SCsQualitative
Singh and Misra (2020) EmpiricalIdentify the factors and their relative importance in implementing the Green SC Management (GSCM) processQuantitative
Bankvall et al. (2010) Case studyConsider the management of CSCs, focusing on the different types of dependencies that exist in construction projectsQualitative
Mojumder and Singh (2021) Case studyStudy the adaptability of GSC practices by various categories of Indian construction companies, followed by finding the correlation of enablers, drivers and barriersMixed
Abas et al. (2020) EmpiricalIdentify key risks and success factors affecting SC performance in construction projects in PakistanQualitative
Saad et al. (2002) Literature reviewExamine the early progress and adoption of “5G innovation.”Mixed
Eriksson (2010) Case studyImprove SC collaboration and performance is central to achieving short-term business goals and long-term competitive advantageQualitative
Segerstedt and Olofsson (2010) Literature reviewDiscuss and show some possible similarities between traditional manufacturing and its SCQualitative
Source: Authors’ own work
Figure 5.

Classification of papers on inquiry mode

Figure 5.

Classification of papers on inquiry mode

Close modal

Figure 6 depicts the yearly distribution of research endeavours over a span of two decades, ranging from 2000 to 2020. It is apparent from the chart that the preponderance of research papers was published in the most recent decade, specifically between 2010 and 2020. Furthermore, the graphical representation in Figure 6 displays a discrete pattern, suggesting that researchers were not consistently engaged in the study of the CSC.

Figure 6.

Year-wise distribution of papers

Figure 6.

Year-wise distribution of papers

Close modal

Figure 7 illustrates that a majority of research on the CSC was conducted in urban areas, either individually or collectively, while considering both urban and rural areas. It is noteworthy that the number of research papers focusing solely on rural areas is significantly lower in all countries.

Figure 7.

Distribution of papers based on the region

Figure 7.

Distribution of papers based on the region

Close modal

A total of 19 different areas have been identified and ranked accordingly based on the highest number of paper counts to the lowest manner to identify less focused areas (critical areas); if two or more areas found an equal number of paper counts, then the earliest study performed (date of publishing) is considered highest ranking, as shown in Table 2. It has been observed that primary attention is given to the IT, IS, collaboration, performance measurement and CSC configuration in most of the research, while financial management, supply chain resilience (SCR), logistics, vendor managed inventory (VMI) and rural CSC (RCSC) are considered important, but little work has been done; however, these areas can play a critical role.

Table 2.

Distribution of the references on various aspects of the CSC area

Area focusedReferencesPaper countRanking*
Information technology (IT)Al-Bazi and Dawood (2012), Bag et al. (2018); Chen et al. (2020), Cheng et al. (2010); Čuš-Babič et al. (2014); Das et al. (2015), Edum-Fotwe et al. (2001); Feng et al. (2018), Getuli et al. (2016); Irizarry et al. (2013), Kumaraswamy et al. (2000); Pala et al. (2016), Pan et al. (2011); Park et al. (2011), Shemov et al. (2020); Shin et al. (2011); Wang et al. (2007a); Yan and Zhangong1 (2012) 181
Information sharing (IS)Bäckstrand and Fredriksson (2020); Bag et al. (2018), Chen et al. (2020); Cheng et al. (2010); Čuš-Babič et al. (2014); Das et al. (2015), Edum-Fotwe et al. (2001); Getuli et al. (2016), Irizarry et al. (2013); Kumaraswamy et al. (2000), Pala et al. (2016); Saini et al. (2019), Shin et al. (2011); Titus and Bröchner (2005); Wang et al. (2007a); Xue et al. (2011) 162
CollaborationAlbaloushi and Skitmore (2008), Briscoe et al. (2001); Briscoe and Dainty (2005), Broft et al. (2016); Davis (2008), Eriksson (2010); Kim and Nguyen (2018a); Love et al. (2002), Meng (2013); Saad et al. (2002), Seth et al. (2018); Wang et al. (2007b); Xie et al. (2010), Xue et al. (2005) 143
Performance measurementAbas et al. (2020), Ebrahimy et al. (2011); Eriksson (2010), Hatmoko and Scott (2010); Kim and Nguyen (2018b); Tennant and Fernie (2013), Wibowo and Sholeh (2015); Yildiz and Ahi (2020) 84
Lean and agile constructionAhmed et al. (2020), Al-Bazi and Dawood (2012); Golpîra (2020); Hatmoko and Scott (2010), Mojumder and Singh (2021); Naim and Barlow (2003), Neeraja et al. (2014) 75
CSC configurationBarker et al. (2000), Cheng et al. (2010); Ding et al. (2015), Fernie and Thorpe (2007); Irizarry et al. (2013), Khalfan et al. (2001); Le et al. (2020) 76
Modular integrated construction (MIC)Al-Bazi and Dawood (2012), Demiralp et al. (2012); Ismail (2020), Zhai et al. (2017); Zhou et al. (2019) 57
Green CSCMAhmed et al. (2020), Mojumder and Singh (2021); Ofori (2000), Singh and Misra (2020) 48
Strategic alliancesBankvall et al. (2010), Love et al. (2002), (2004)39
Knowledge managementCox and Ireland (2002), Duryan and Smyth (2019); Wang and Shi (2019) 310
Client-led strategiesBriscoe et al. (2004), Dainty and Brooke (2004); Love et al. (2004) 311
PlanningBankvall et al. (2010), Segerstedt and Olofsson (2010); Thunberg and Fredriksson (2018) 312
Risk managementAloini et al. (2012), Bajpai et al. (2016); Zainal Abidin and Ingirige (2018) 313
Supplier SelectionKumaraswamy et al. (2000); Tamošaitiene et al. (2017) 214
Financial managementMotawa and Kaka (2009), Neeraja et al. (2014) 215
LogisticsNeeraja et al. (2014); Vidalakis et al. (2011a) 216
Supply chain resilience (SCR)Romagnoli et al. (2019), Zainal Abidin and Ingirige (2018) 217
Vendor managed inventory (VMI)Golpîra (2020) 118
Rural CSCAbas et al. (2020) 119
 
Notes:

*Ranking is given from the highest number of papers to the lowest manner. In case two or more areas found an equal number of papers, then the earliest study performed on that area (date of publishing) is considered the highest ranking

Source: Authors’ own work

A total of 78 research articles on CSC were analysed, and the research aim and data collection methodology of all the articles were mentioned in Table 3. It was noted that the research aims are distributed to different extents of CSC.

To enlighten the significant areas of CSC, a critical-analysis approach was adopted. Based on the data output from Table 2, various significant areas and major issues of CSC are highlighted and discussed in detail.

IT in SCM plays an important role in optimising the flow decisions of a supply network to attain organisational competitiveness, reduce inventory, improve service levels and cost and reduce e-risks (Yan and Zhangong1, 2012). Similarly, IT in CSC also provides effective integration and sharing of information within and outside organisations (Cheng et al., 2010; Getuli et al., 2016). CSC uses numerous applications of IT like RFID, EDI, barcode, e-commerce, business intelligence support systems, ERP packages, etc., to enhance its performance (Demiralp et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2007a). The merits have already been proved in the two areas of construction (Modular Integrated Construction) to reduce the risk of CSC (Al-Bazi and Dawood, 2012). Hence, the implementation of an advanced IT system in the CSC has a scope of future work for reforming and advancing the CSC.

The role of the information system is to deliver the aggregate and relevant information to all stages of CSC at the right time (Wang et al., 2007a). The efficient IS among the stakeholders (such as the client, suppliers, consultant, contractor and sub-contractors) of CSC improves the performance of CSC by developing the ability to take the right decisions, increase visibility at every stage and reduce the operating cost (Irizarry et al., 2013; Das et al., 2015; Pala et al., 2016). Although the IS among the stakeholders of CSC is a complex task (Saini et al., 2019; Xue et al., 2011), nowadays, the IS has become easier with the advancements in IT (Das et al., 2015; Irizarry et al., 2013; Shin et al., 2011).

It is ideal if the SC delivers the services at the right price, quantity and time. To achieve this, CSC has adopted several strategies (Eriksson, 2010). Among these strategies, collaboration and partnership are identified as crucial (Meng, 2013). Collaboration and partnership in CSC can reduce costs, improve responsiveness to change and facilitate decision-making (Das et al., 2015). Hence, the CSC should develop a collaboration and partnership system to enhance the efficiency and productivity of the system.

The business environment for the construction sector has become difficult, and its growth relies on continuous performance measurement in globalisation (Yitmen, 2007). Performance measurement is an integrated approach for monitoring and controlling an organisation’s activities to achieve its objectives (Wibowo and Sholeh, 2015). There are different ways for performance measurement of the SC Operations Reference model (Pan et al., 2011; Wibowo and Sholeh, 2015; Yan and Zhangong1, 2012; Yildiz and Ahi, 2020); analytic hierarchy process (AHP) (Seth et al., 2018), DEMATEL-modified analytic network process (Yildiz and Ahi, 2020), data envelopment analysis (Tatari and Kucukvar, 2012a), etc. The major problem that occurs with the performance measurement of CSC is not considering every associated aspect. Therefore, the CSC should develop a holistic performance measurement system to monitor and evaluate the system.

SCR has developed as a core element in SC risk management as a strategy to protect against SC risks and disruptions. Resilience can be defined as “the adaptive capability of a system to respond to disruptions in a better way or even gain an advantage during disruptive events” (Romagnoli et al., 2019). After a natural disaster, resilience becomes more important. A natural disaster may increase the cost, delay construction, lower quality standards, etc., at the CSC. CSC network vulnerability is reduced by SCR (Ekanayake et al., 2020). Table 2 shows only two papers are related to SCR in CSC, which started in 2018. Although SCR is an important research topic for CSC in the current volatile natural conditions, it is in a nascent stage.

Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) works together with the upstream and downstream members to attain an efficient SC by reducing the bullwhip effect. VMI is an effective solution for responding to the volatile demand for construction materials on sites (Golpîra, 2020). Only a single scholarly work related to VMI in CSC has been conducted, while few papers demonstrate the role of VMI in the construction sector in specific (Golpîra, 2020). It is demanded to implement the VMI approach in CSC.

Logistics management is the management of the flow, storage and information of materials across SCs (Vidalakis et al., 2011b). The logistics cost is exponentially related to the levels of material demand and movement of vehicles. Although construction logistics is a critical part of CSC (Ying et al., 2014), the research dedicated to logistics application in the construction sector is in a nascent stage, and it is a prerequisite to understanding the elementary problems of CSC (Vidalakis et al., 2011a). However, Ekeskär and Rudberg proposed the third party logistic solution to facilitate productive work at the construction site itself, a reduction of costs and increased use of site assets (Ekeskär and Rudberg, 2016). The papers related to logistics in CSC are available in the literature, as shown in Table 2, which also recommends future work in this direction.

The International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) has reported that 45% of humanity lives in rural areas of developing countries and that the rural region plays a vital role in improving productivity, achieving socioeconomic equality and fostering ambition and stability. (Abas et al., 2020; IFAD “Rural Development Report 2021”). Construction in the rural area is considered of top importance for any developing nation’s development process (Mishra 2017). It can be achieved by the highly efficient RCSC. However, it is clear from Table 2 that only a single paper has been published in this area until 2020. Thus, RCSC is highly important, especially for developing countries, and has a lot of potential to strengthen the construction economy in general and rural in specific.

The study uses bibliometric analysis to visualise the latest trends and recent hotspots on CSC and includes four sub-parts: overlay mapping for authors (including co-authors), research areas, major repeating keywords in titles and abstracts in all referenced papers and a density map of major keywords in all papers, further illustrating the study results.

Figure 8 shows the following key points regarding the mapping of authors who published their notorious work on CSC:

Figure 8.

Bibliometric map of collaboration of authors based on the timeline

Figure 8.

Bibliometric map of collaboration of authors based on the timeline

Close modal
  • Bibliometric concatenation of all 211 authors (including co-authors) referenced in this work with the help of VOS-viewer in a systematic network of related and linked keywords depending on the work area;

  • The overlay of all publications and colour scales from 2000 to 2020 by which it can be easily checked that most of the colour is red or near to red (orange, reddish, maroon, etc.), which indicates that major research work has been done in recent years; and

  • Very few circles are inter-connected, which implies a lack of collaboration among researchers.

5.2.1 Mapping of frequently used keywords in the whole paper.

In total, 18 keywords appear most often in this study (repeating more than or equal to two papers). An overlay visualisation of the keyword co-occurrence networks map (Figure 9) shows that some keyword circles are big, and most of the work done on those keywords like “supply chain management” and “construction industry”, which are widely used as a keyword in green colour and red colour on the scale, represents keywords like “green supply chain management”, “enablers”, “resilience” and “developing countries” that have only appeared in recent years of research studies related to CSC and not directly connected “supply chain management” and “construction industry” circles which implies negligible research has been done related to these keywords in CSC.

Figure 9.

Overlay mapping of most often used keywords in all referenced papers

Figure 9.

Overlay mapping of most often used keywords in all referenced papers

Close modal

5.2.2 Mapping of co-occurrence of keywords in title and abstract only.

The mapping of the occurrence of inter-related keywords in “Title” and “Abstract” of the research papers (at least ten papers) is depicted in Figure 10. By this analysis, there are a total of 34 different keywords have been identified.

Figure 10.

Mapping of co-occurrence of keywords in all the research papers in their “Title” and “Abstract”

Figure 10.

Mapping of co-occurrence of keywords in all the research papers in their “Title” and “Abstract”

Close modal

A review of 78 research papers from two decades, i.e. 2000–2020, according to the United Nations’ Decade of action’ plan, was conducted to analyse CSC’s recent developments, critical areas, methodologies and goals. Several interesting results come out of this study. The results from the prevailing review are particularised below:

  • Most published studies are empirical, followed by case studies based on uniform distributions, and few researchers worked on literature reviews;

  • This review is conducted uniformly on developed, developing and underdeveloped nations and revealed that UK and China are doing well, respectively;

  • The study discovered that work in mixed research is next to negligible. Most of the authors’ work is purely qualitative research followed by quantitative research;

  • Year-wise distribution of papers in Figure 6 shows that the graph is discrete, which implies researchers are not consistent in the CSC area;

  • Although, according to the report of the United Nations agency- IFAD, approximately 45% of the world’s population lives in rural areas of developing countries; still research in CSC-related to Rural areas is negligible;

  • The primarily focused areas have been seen in collaboration, performance measurement, IS and IT in most research studies. Financial management, VMI, logistics, SCR and RCSC are considered important, as little work has been done since there is a lot of scope for future research in these directions;

  • In the bibliometric analysis, the number of search results has been seen to increase over the years. However, most of the work related to CSC was done after 2010, which implies first United Nations’ Decade of action plan played its role in the construction sector;

  • Most of the published articles are from only one country, i.e. the UK, which implies that CSC is a new concept worldwide and is still being implemented in most countries. However, developing countries like China and India have come up with a CSC approach to enhance their performance;

  • The bibliometric analysis also shows a lack of collaboration among authors, which could deaccelerate innovation in research; and

  • Keywords related to CSC like “Green Supply Chain Management”, “Enablers”, “Resilience” and “Developing Countries” have only appeared in recent years of research studies, which implies negligible research has been done related to these keywords.

This study makes some distinct contributions to future research in the construction sector, and the results can provide researchers and engineers with useful direction for developing the next stage of research in the field:

  • Implementing SC in construction is both unique and essential, particularly in rural areas of developing countries;

  • A substantial number of published studies are empirical, followed by case studies based on uniform distributions, and few researchers have conducted literature reviews, so in-depth literature reviews of high quality are essential in this sector since literature reviews are critical to innovation;

  • To improve CSC performance, stakeholders should focus on financial management, SCR, logistics, VMI and RCSC. In addition to having an impact on decision-making, developing and implementing the CSC framework, these issues are also important in several other areas;

  • In recent years of research, keywords such as “Green Supply Chain Management”, “Enablers”, “Resilience” and “Developing Countries” have appeared in few numbers and should be considered in future research work;

  • Bibliometric maps indicate a lack of collaboration among authors. To accelerate innovation, large collaborations are necessary for research; and

  • There is a need for the next “Decade of Action” plan of the United Nations to focus more on developing countries and to extend work to rural areas as well as Green-CSC, both of which are prominent in the findings of this study.

The study analysed CSC’s recent developments, critical areas, methodologies and goals. In total, 78 research papers from the last two decades were reviewed in accordance with the United Nations “Decade of Action” plan, which revealed research gaps and critical areas and provided directions for future research. Most published studies are empirical, followed by case studies based on uniform distributions, and only a few authors conducted literature reviews. Most of the authors’ work consists of qualitative research, followed by quantitative research, while their contributions to mixed research are minimal. There is evidence that the United Kingdom and China are performing well in developed countries and developing countries, respectively, but other nations have yet to follow suit. Year-wise distribution graph of papers in Figure 6 is discrete, which implies researchers are not consistent in the CSC area, which is a major issue. CSC does not conduct significant research on rural areas, despite the fact that approximately 45% of the world’s population lives in rural areas, according to a report by the United Nations agency IFAD. In most research studies, collaboration, performance measurement, IS and IT are considered important, while financial management, VMI, logistics, SCR and RCSC are considered important but receive less attention. There is a great deal of scope for future research in these areas. According to bibliometric maps, the number of search results has increased over the years. However, most of the work on CSC has been done since 2010, and the most significant key areas are SCM and the construction industry. Most of the published articles are from the UK, suggesting that CSC is a new concept and is still being implemented in most countries, although developing countries like China and India have developed a CSC approach to improving CSC performance. It also shows a lack of collaboration among authors, which could deaccelerate innovation in research. Further, keywords relating to CSC, such as “Green Supply Chain Management”, “Enablers”, “Resilience” and “Developing Countries”, have only appeared in recent years of studies, indicating that little research has been conducted on these subjects.

CSC is a very dominant topic in the current study, but there are some limitations to it. Scopus and Web of Science databases were used to conduct the study. A future study can therefore consider papers related to other databases. As the focus was specifically dedicated to construction material SC only, the papers associated with SCs of labours and equipment have been eradicated.

Conflict of interest: On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Abas
,
M.
,
Khattak
,
S.B.
,
Habib
,
T.
and
Nadir
,
U.
(
2020
), “
Assessment of critical risk and success factors in construction supply chain: a case of Pakistan
”,
International Journal of Construction Management
, Vol.
22
No.
12
, pp.
2258
-
2266
, doi: .
Ahmed
,
M.
,
Thaheem
,
M.J.
and
Maqsoom
,
A.
(
2020
), “
Barriers and opportunities to greening the construction supply chain management: cause-driven implementation strategies for developing countries
”,
Benchmarking: An International Journal
, Vol.
27
No.
3
, pp.
1211
-
1237
.
Albaloushi
,
H.
and
Skitmore
,
M.
(
2008
), “
Supply chain management in the UAE construction industry
”,
International Journal of Construction Management
, Vol.
8
No.
1
, pp.
53
-
71
.
Al-Bazi
,
A.
and
Dawood
,
N.
(
2012
), “
Simulation-based genetic algorithms for construction supply chain management: off-site precast concrete production as a case study
”,
OR Insight
, Vol.
25
No.
3
, pp.
165
-
184
.
Aloini
,
D.
,
Dulmin
,
R.
,
Mininno
,
V.
and
Ponticelli
,
S.
(
2012
), “
Supply chain management: a review of implementation risks in the construction industry
”,
Business Process Management Journal
, Vol.
18
No.
5
, pp.
735
-
761
.
Bäckstrand
,
J.
and
Fredriksson
,
A.
(
2020
), “
The role of supplier information availability for construction supply chain performance
”,
Production Planning and Control
, Vol.
33
Nos
9/10
, doi: .
Bag
,
S.
,
Telukdarie
,
A.
,
Pretorius
,
J.H.C.
and
Gupta
,
S.
(
2018
), “
Industry 4.0 and supply chain sustainability: framework and future research directions
”,
Benchmarking: An International Journal
,
Bajpai
,
P.
,
Kalra
,
M.
and
Sunyna Bushanchandar
,
A.
(
2016
), “
Supply chain management of road projects in India using FMEA and ISM technique
”,
Indian Journal of Science and Technology
, Vol.
9
No.
S1
, doi: .
Bankvall
,
L.
,
Bygballe
,
L.E.
,
Dubois
,
A.
and
Jahre
,
M.
(
2010
), “
Interdependence in supply chains and projects in construction
”,
Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
, Vol.
15
No.
5
, pp.
385
-
393
.
Barker
,
R.
,
Hong-Minh
,
S.
and
Naim
,
M.
(
2000
), “
The terrain scanning methodology. Assessing and improving construction supply chains
”,
European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management
, Vol.
6
Nos
3/4
.
Briscoe
,
G.
and
Dainty
,
A.
(
2005
), “
Construction supply chain integration: an elusive goal?
”,
Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
, Vol.
10
No.
4
, pp.
319
-
326
.
Briscoe
,
G.
,
Dainty
,
A.R.J.
and
Millett
,
S.
(
2001
), “
Construction supply chain partnerships: skills, knowledge and attitudinal requirements
”,
European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management
, Vol.
7
No.
4
,
available at:
Construction supply chain partnerships: skills, knowledge and attitudinal requirementsLink to the Homepage
Briscoe
,
G.H.
,
Dainty
,
A.R.J.
,
Millett
,
S.J.
and
Neale
,
R.H.
(
2004
), “
Client-led strategies for construction supply chain improvement
”,
Construction Management and Economics
, Vol.
22
No.
2
, pp.
193
-
201
.
Broft
,
R.
,
Badi
,
S.M.
and
Pryke
,
S.
(
2016
), “
Towards supply chain maturity in construction
”,
Built Environment Project and Asset Management
, Vol.
6
No.
2
, pp.
187
-
204
.
Chen
,
Q.
,
Hall
,
D.M.
,
Adey
,
B.T.
and
Haas
,
C.T.
(
2020
), “
Identifying enablers for coordination across construction supply chain processes: a systematic literature review
”,
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
, Vol.
28
No.
4
, pp.
1083
-
1113
.
Cheng
,
J.C.P.
,
Law
,
K.H.
,
Bjornsson
,
H.
,
Jones
,
A.
and
Sriram
,
R.
(
2010
), “
A service-oriented framework for construction supply chain integration
”,
Automation in Construction
, Vol.
19
No.
2
, pp.
245
-
260
.
Cox
,
A.
and
Ireland
,
P.
(
2002
), “
Managing construction supply chains: the common-sense approach
”,
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
, Vol.
9
Nos
5/6
, pp.
409
-
418
.
Čuš-Babič
,
N.
,
Rebolj
,
D.
,
Nekrep-Perc
,
M.
and
Podbreznik
,
P.
(
2014
), “
Supply-chain transparency within industrialised construction projects
”,
Computers in Industry
, Vol.
65
No.
2
, pp.
345
-
353
.
Dainty
,
A.R.J.
and
Brooke
,
R.J.
(
2004
), “
Towards improved construction waste minimisation: a need for improved supply chain integration?
”,
Structural Survey
, Vol.
22
No.
1
, pp.
20
-
29
.
Darko
,
A.
,
Chan
,
A.P.C.
,
Huo
,
X.
and
Owusu-Manu
,
D.G.
(
2019
), “
A scientometric analysis and visualisation of global green building research
”,
Building and Environment
, Vol.
149
, pp.
501
-
511
.
Das
,
M.
,
Cheng
,
J.C.P.
and
Law
,
K.H.
(
2015
), “
An ontology-based web service framework for construction supply chain collaboration and management
”,
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
, Vol.
22
No.
5
, pp.
551
-
572
.
Davis
,
P.R.
(
2008
), “
A relationship approach to construction supply chains
”,
Industrial Management and Data Systems
, Vol.
108
No.
3
, pp.
310
-
327
.
Decade of Action – United Nations Sustainable Development
(
2020
),
available at:
Link to the A relationship approach to construction supply chainsLink to the Cited article (accessed 21 April 2022).
Demiralp
,
G.
,
Guven
,
G.
and
Ergen
,
E.
(
2012
), “
Analysing the benefits of RFID technology for cost sharing in construction supply chains: a case study on prefabricated precast components
”,
Automation in Construction
, Vol.
24
, pp.
120
-
129
.
Ding
,
Z.
,
Zuo
,
J.
,
Wu
,
J.
and
Wang
,
J.Y.
(
2015
), “
Key factors for the BIM adoption by architects: a China study
”,
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
, Vol.
22
No.
6
, pp.
732
-
748
.
Dixit
,
A.
,
Routroy
,
S.
and
Dubey
,
S.K.
(
2019
), “
A systematic literature review of healthcare supply chain and implications of future research
”,
International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing
, Vol.
13
No.
4
.
Duryan
,
M.
and
Smyth
,
H.
(
2019
), “
Service design and knowledge management in the construction supply chain for an infrastructure programme
”,
Built Environment Project and Asset Management
, Vol.
9
No.
1
, pp.
118
-
137
.
Ebrahimy
,
Y.
,
AbouRizk
,
S.M.
,
Fernando
,
S.
and
Mohamed
,
Y.
(
2011
), “
Simulation modeling and sensitivity analysis of a tunneling construction project's supply chain
”,
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
, Vol.
18
No.
5
, pp.
462
-
480
.
Edum-Fotwe
,
F.T.
,
Thorpe
,
A.
and
Mcca
,
R.
(
2001
), “
Information procurement practices of key actors in construction supply chains
”,
European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management
, Vol.
7
No.
3
.
Ekanayake
,
E.M.A.C
,
Shen
,
G.Q.P.
and
Kumaraswamy
,
M.M.
(
2020
), “
Identifying supply chain capabilities of construction firms in industrialised construction
”,
Production Planning and Control
, Vol.
32
No.
4
, pp.
303
-
321
.
Ekeskär
,
A.
and
Rudberg
,
M.
(
2016
), “
Third-party logistics in construction: the case of a large hospital project
”,
Construction Management and Economics
, Vol.
34
No.
3
, pp.
174
-
191
.
Enshassi
,
A.
(
2000
), “
Environmental concerns for construction growth in Gaza Strip
”,
Building and Environment
, Vol.
35
No.
3
, pp.
273
-
279
.
Eriksson
,
P.E.
(
2010
), “
Improving construction supply chain collaboration and performance: a lean construction pilot project
”,
Supply Chain Management
, Vol.
15
No.
5
, pp.
394
-
403
.
Farooqui
,
R.U.
,
Lodi
,
S.
,
Ahmed
,
S.M.
and
Lodi
,
S.H.
(
2018
), “
Assessing the project management culture in construction client organizations in Pakistan-a preliminary to industry performance improvement building information modelling in Pakistan view project constitutive modelling of ferrocement elements view project assessment of Pakistani construction industry-current performance and the way forward
”,
available at:
Assessing the project management culture in construction client organizations in Pakistan-a preliminary to industry performance improvement building information modelling in Pakistan view project constitutive modelling of ferrocement elements view project assessment of Pakistani construction industry-current performance and the way forwardLink to the ResearchGate site (accessed 17 January 2022).
Feng
,
C.
,
Ma
,
Y.
,
Zhou
,
G.
and
Ni
,
T.
(
2018
), “
Stackelberg game optimisation for integrated production-distribution-construction system in construction supply chain
”,
Knowledge-Based Systems
, Vol.
157
, pp.
52
-
67
.
Fernie
,
S.
and
Thorpe
,
A.
(
2007
), “
Exploring change in construction: supply chain management
”,
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
, Vol.
14
No.
4
, pp.
319
-
333
.
Getuli
,
V.
,
Ventura
,
S.M.
,
Capone
,
P.
and
Ciribini
,
A.L.C.
(
2016
), “
A BIM-based construction supply chain framework for monitoring progress and coordination of site activities
”,
Procedia Engineering
, Vol.
164
, pp.
542
-
549
.
Goel
,
A.
,
Ganesh
,
L.S.
and
Kaur
,
A.
(
2019
), “
Deductive content analysis of research on sustainable construction in India: current progress and future directions
”,
Journal of Cleaner Production
, Vol.
226
, pp.
142
-
158
.
Golpîra
,
H.
(
2020
), “
Optimal integration of the facility location problem into the multi-project multi-supplier multi-resource construction supply chain network design under the vendor managed inventory strategy
”,
Expert Systems with Applications
, Vol.
139
, doi: .
Gunarathne
,
N.
,
Wijayasundara
,
M.
,
Senaratne
,
S.
,
Kanchana
,
P.D.K.
and
Cooray
,
T.
(
2021
), “
Uncovering corporate disclosure for a circular economy: an analysis of sustainability and integrated reporting by Sri Lankan companies
”,
Sustainable Production and Consumption
, Vol.
27
, pp.
787
-
801
.
Ha
,
S.H.
and
Krishnan
,
R.
(
2008
), “
A hybrid approach to supplier selection for the maintenance of a competitive supply chain
”,
Expert Systems with Applications
, Vol.
34
No.
2
, pp.
1303
-
1311
.
Hatmoko
,
J.U.D.
and
Scott
,
S.
(
2010
), “
Simulating the impact of supply chain management practice on the performance of medium-sized building projects
”,
Construction Management and Economics
, Vol.
28
No.
1
, pp.
35
-
49
.
Henderson
,
V.
,
Storeygard
,
A.
and
Weil
,
D.N.
(
2011
), “
A bright idea for measuring economic growth
”,
American Economic Review
, Vol.
101
No.
3
, pp.
194
-
199
.
Irizarry
,
J.
,
Karan
,
E.P.
and
Jalaei
,
F.
(
2013
), “
Integrating BIM and GIS to improve the visual monitoring of construction supply chain management
”,
Automation in Construction
, Vol.
31
, pp.
241
-
254
.
Ismail
,
Z.A.B.
(
2020
), “
Hybrid intelligent vehicle system for managing construction supply chain in precast concrete building construction projects
”,
World Journal of Engineering
, Vol.
18
No.
4
, pp.
538
-
546
.
Khalfan
,
M.M.
,
Anumba
,
C.J.
,
Siemieniuch
,
C.E.
and
Sinclair
,
M.A.
(
2001
), “
Readiness assessment of the construction supply chain for concurrent engineering
”,
European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management
, Vol.
7
No.
2
.
Kim
,
S.Y.
and
Nguyen
,
V.T.
(
2018a
), “
An AHP framework for evaluating construction supply chain relationships
”,
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering
, Vol.
22
No.
5
.
Kim
,
S.Y.
and
Nguyen
,
V.T.
(
2018b
), “
A structural model for the impact of supply chain relationship traits on project performance in construction
”,
Production Planning and Control
, Vol.
29
No.
2
, pp.
170
-
183
.
Kumar
,
A.
and
Singh
,
N.
(
2022
), “
A review on light weight steel foam concrete composite panels for buildings
”,
AIP Conference Proceedings, AIP Publishing LLCAIP Publishing
, Vol.
2413
No.
1
, p.
30004
.
Kumaraswamy
,
M.
,
Palaneeswaran
,
E.
and
Humphreys
,
P.
(
2000
), “
Selection matters – In construction supply chain optimisation
”,
International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management
, Vol.
30
Nos
7/8
, pp.
661
-
680
.
Le
,
P.L.
,
Elmughrabi
,
W.
,
Dao
,
T.M.
and
Chaabane
,
A.
(
2020
), “
Present focuses and future directions of decision-making in construction supply chain management: a systematic review
”,
International Journal of Construction Management
, Vol.
20
No.
5
, pp.
490
-
509
.
Love
,
P.E.D.
,
Irani
,
Z.
and
Edwards
,
D.J.
(
2004
), “
A seamless supply chain management model for construction
”,
Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
, Vol.
9
No.
1
, pp.
43
-
56
.
Love
,
P.E.D.
,
Irani
,
Z.
,
Cheng
,
E.
and
Li
,
H.
(
2002
), “
A model for supporting inter-organisational relations in the supply chain
”,
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
, Vol.
9
No.
1
.
Manikandan
,
S.
,
Sundarakani
,
B.
and
Pereira
,
V.
(
2020
), “Skill development: role of industry- academia dyadic collaboration for sustaining the construction supply chain in rural India”,
Sustainable Business Practices for Rural Development: The Role of Intellectual Capital
,
Palgrave Macmillan
, pp.
27
-
40
.
Marsh
(
2021
), “
Future of construction a global forecast for construction to 2030
”.
Meng
,
X.
(
2013
), “
Change in UK construction: moving toward supply chain collaboration
”,
Journal of Civil Engineering and Management
, Vol.
19
No.
3
, pp.
422
-
432
.
Mishra
,
K.K.
(
2017
), “
Using geo-informatics for development of rural roads under pradhan mantri gram sadak yojna
”, available at: (accessed 18 January 2022).
Mohd Nawi
,
M.N.
,
Baluch
,
N.
and
Bahauddin
,
A.Y.
(
2014
), “
Impact of fragmentation issue in construction industry: an overview
”,
MATEC Web of Conferences
,
EDP Sciences
, Vol.
15
, doi: .
Mojumder
,
A.
and
Singh
,
A.
(
2021
), “
An exploratory study of the adaptation of green supply chain management in construction industry: the case of Indian construction companies
”,
Journal of Cleaner Production
, Vol.
295
, p.
126400
, doi: .
Motawa
,
I.
and
Kaka
,
A.
(
2009
), “
Modelling payment mechanisms for supply chain in construction
”,
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
, Vol.
16
No.
4
, pp.
325
-
336
.
Naim
,
M.
and
Barlow
,
J.
(
2003
), “
An innovative supply chain strategy for customised housing
”,
Construction Management and Economics
, Vol.
21
No.
6
, pp.
593
-
602
.
Neeraja
,
B.
,
Mehta
,
M.
and
Chandani
,
A.
(
2014
), “
Supply chain and logistics for the present-day business
”,
Procedia Economics and Finance
, Vol.
11
, pp.
665
-
675
.
O'Brien
,
W.J.
,
Formoso
,
C.T.
,
Ruben
,
V.
and
London
,
K.
(Eds) (
2008
),
Construction Supply Chain Management Handbook
,
CRC Press
, doi: .
Ofori
,
G.
(
2000
), “
Greening the construction supply chain in Singapore
”,
European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management
, Vol.
6
Nos
3/4
.
Onat
,
N.C.
and
Kucukvar
,
M.
(
2020
), “
Carbon footprint of construction industry: a global review and supply chain analysis
”,
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
, Vol.
124
, doi: .
Pala
,
M.
,
Edum-Fotwe
,
F.
,
Ruikar
,
K.
,
Peters
,
C.
and
Doughty
,
N.
(
2016
), “
Implementing commercial information exchange: a construction supply chain case study
”,
Construction Management and Economics
, Vol.
34
No.
12
, pp.
898
-
918
.
Pan
,
N.H.
,
Lee
,
M.L.
and
Chen
,
S.Q.
(
2011
), “
Construction material supply chain process analysis and optimisation
”,
Journal of Civil Engineering and Management
, Vol.
17
No.
3
, pp.
357
-
370
.
Park
,
M.
,
Kim
,
W.Y.
,
Lee
,
H.S.
and
Han
,
S.
(
2011
), “
Supply chain management model for ready mixed concrete
”,
Automation in Construction
, Vol.
20
No.
1
, pp.
44
-
55
.
Romagnoli
,
M.
,
Fragiacomo
,
M.
,
Brunori
,
A.
,
Follesa
,
M.
and
Scarascia Mugnozza
,
G.
(
2019
), “Solid wood and wood-based composites: the challenge of sustainability looking for a short and smart supply chain”,
Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering
,
Springer
, Vol.
24
, pp.
783
-
807
.
Rural Development Report
(
2021
),
available at:
Rural Development ReportLink to the Report (accessed 29 April 2022).
Saad
,
M.
,
Jones
,
M.
and
James
,
P.
(
2002
), “
A review of the progress towards the adoption of supply chain management (SCM) relationships in construction
”,
European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management
, Vol.
8
No.
3
.
Saini
,
M.
,
Arif
,
M.
and
Kulonda
,
D.J.
(
2019
), “
Challenges to transferring and sharing of tacit knowledge within a construction supply chain
”,
Construction Innovation
, Vol.
19
No.
1
, pp.
15
-
33
.
Segerstedt
,
A.
and
Olofsson
,
T.
(
2010
), “
Supply chains in the construction industry
”,
Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
, Vol.
15
No.
5
, pp.
347
-
353
.
Seth
,
D.
,
Nemani
,
V.K.
,
Pokharel
,
S.
and
Al Sayed
,
A.Y.
(
2018
), “
Impact of competitive conditions on supplier evaluation: a construction supply chain case study
”,
Production Planning and Control
, Vol.
29
No.
3
, pp.
217
-
235
.
Shemov
,
G.
,
Garcia de Soto
,
B.
and
Alkhzaimi
,
H.
(
2020
), “
Blockchain applied to the construction supply chain: a case study with threat model
”,
Frontiers of Engineering Management
, Vol.
7
No.
4
, pp.
564
-
577
.
Shin
,
T.H.
,
Chin
,
S.
,
Yoon
,
S.W.
and
Kwon
,
S.W.
(
2011
), “
A service-oriented integrated information framework for RFID/WSN-based intelligent construction supply chain management
”,
Automation in Construction
, Vol.
20
No.
6
, pp.
706
-
715
.
Singh
,
A.
and
Misra
,
S.C.
(
2020
), “
Ordering drivers of green supply chain management practices in Indian construction industry
”,
International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management
, Vol.
39
No.
8
, pp.
1869
-
1895
, doi: .
Singh
,
N.
,
Ashish
,
D.K.
and
Dixit
,
A.
(
2022
), “
A strategy to enhance the resource utilisation for construction supply chain in rural India
”,
AIP Conference Proceedings, AIP Publishing LLCAIP Publishing
, Vol.
2413
No.
1
, p.
30017
.
Tamošaitiene
,
J.
,
Zavadskas
,
E.K.
,
Šileikaite
,
I.
and
Turskis
,
Z.
(
2017
), “
A novel hybrid MCDM approach for complicated supply chain management problems in construction
”,
Procedia Engineering
, Vol.
172
, pp.
1137
-
1145
.
Tatari
,
O.
and
Kucukvar
,
M.
(
2012
), “
Eco-efficiency of construction materials: data envelopment analysis
”,
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
, Vol.
138
No.
6
, pp.
733
-
741
.
Tennant
,
S.
and
Fernie
,
S.
(
2013
), “
Organisational learning in construction supply chains
”,
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
, Vol.
20
No.
1
, pp.
83
-
98
.
Thunberg
,
M.
and
Fredriksson
,
A.
(
2018
), “
Bringing planning back into the picture–how can supply chain planning aid in dealing with supply chain-related problems in construction?
”,
Construction Management and Economics
, Vol.
36
No.
8
, pp.
425
-
442
.
Titus
,
S.
and
Bröchner
,
J.
(
2005
), “
Managing information flow in construction supply chains
”,
Construction Innovation
, Vol.
5
No.
2
, pp.
71
-
82
.
Vidalakis
,
C.
,
Tookey
,
J.E.
and
Sommerville
,
J.
(
2011a
), “
The logistics of construction supply chains: the builders' merchant perspective
”,
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
, Vol.
18
No.
1
, pp.
66
-
81
.
Vidalakis
,
C.
,
Tookey
,
J.E.
and
Sommerville
,
J.
(
2011b
), “
Logistics simulation modelling across construction supply chains
”,
Construction Innovation
, Vol.
11
No.
2
, pp.
212
-
228
.
Vrijhoef
,
R.
and
Koskela
,
L.
(
2000
), “
The four roles of supply chain management in construction
”,
European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management
, Vol.
6
Nos
3/4
.
Wang
,
Q.
and
Shi
,
Q.
(
2019
), “
The incentive mechanism of knowledge sharing in the industrial construction supply chain based on a supervisory mechanism
”,
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
, Vol.
26
No.
6
, pp.
989
-
1003
.
Wang
,
L.C.
,
Lin
,
Y.C.
and
Lin
,
P.H.
(
2007a
), “
Dynamic mobile RFID-based supply chain control and management system in construction
”,
Advanced Engineering Informatics
, Vol.
21
No.
4
, pp.
377
-
390
.
Wang
,
Y.
,
Yu
,
X.
and
Xue
,
X.
(
2007b
), “
An application of the method of combined radix determination for selecting construction supply chain partners
”,
International Journal of Project Management
, Vol.
25
No.
2
, pp.
128
-
133
.
Wibowo
,
M.A.
and
Sholeh
,
M.N.
(
2015
), “
The analysis of supply chain performance measurement at construction project
”,
Procedia Engineering
, Vol.
125
, pp.
25
-
31
.
World Bank
(
2011
),
Measuring the real size of the World’s Economy: The Framework Methodology
,
available at:
Measuring the real size of the World’s Economy: The Framework MethodologyLink to the cited article (accessed 17 January 2022).
Xue
,
X.
,
Li
,
X.
,
Shen
,
Q.
and
Wang
,
Y.
(
2005
), “
An agent-based framework for supply chain coordination in construction
”,
Automation in Construction
, Vol.
14
No.
3
, pp.
413
-
430
.
Xie
,
C.
,
Wu
,
D.
,
Luo
,
J.
and
Hu
,
X.
(
2010
), “
A case study of multi-team communications in construction design under supply chain partnering
”,
Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
, Vol.
15
No.
5
, pp.
363
-
370
.
Xue
,
X.
,
Shen
,
Q.
,
Tan
,
Y.
,
Zhang
,
Y.
and
Fan
,
H.
(
2011
), “
Comparing the value of information sharing under different inventory policies in construction supply chain
”,
International Journal of Project Management
, Vol.
29
No.
7
, pp.
867
-
876
.
Yan
,
C.
and
Zhangong
,
X.
(
2012
), “LNEE 157 – study on the information technology-based lean construction supply chain management model”,
Recent Progress in Data Engineering and Internet Technology
,
Springer
,
Berlin Heidelberg
, Vol.
2
, pp.
499
-
505
.
Yeo
,
K.T.
and
Ning
,
J.H.
(
2006
), “
Managing uncertainty in major equipment procurement in engineering projects
”,
European Journal of Operational Research
, Vol.
171
No.
1
, pp.
123
-
134
.
Yildiz
,
K.
and
Ahi
,
M.T.
(
2020
), “
Innovative decision support model for construction supply chain performance management
”,
Production Planning and Control
, Vol.
33
Nos
9/10
, doi: .
Ying
,
F.
,
Tookey
,
J.
and
Roberti
,
J.
(
2014
), “
Addressing effective construction logistics through the lens of vehicle movements
”,
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
, Vol.
21
No.
3
, pp.
261
-
275
.
Yitmen
,
I.
(
2007
), “
The challenge of change for innovation in construction: a North Cyprus perspective
”,
Building and Environment
, Vol.
42
No.
3
, pp.
1319
-
1328
.
Zainal Abidin
,
N.A.
and
Ingirige
,
B.
(
2018
), “
The dynamics of vulnerabilities and capabilities in improving resilience within Malaysian construction supply chain
”,
Construction Innovation
, Vol.
18
No.
4
, pp.
412
-
432
.
Zhai
,
Y.
,
Zhong
,
R.Y.
,
Li
,
Z.
and
Huang
,
G.
(
2017
), “
Production lead-time hedging and coordination in prefabricated construction supply chain management
”,
International Journal of Production Research
, Vol.
55
No.
14
, pp.
3984
-
4002
.
Zhou
,
J.
,
He
,
P.
,
Qin
,
Y.
and
Ren
,
D.
(
2019
), “
A selection model based on SWOT analysis for determining a suitable strategy of prefabrication implementation in rural areas
”,
Sustainable Cities and Society
, Vol.
50
, doi: .
Licensed re-use rights only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal