Examines the use of interorganizational networking as a way for traditionally bureaucratic organizations to become more innovative. Cites examples of networking from manufacturing and the service sector to illustrate the adaptability and flexibility of this form of organization. Examines the pros and cons, thus revealing that networking is a viable option for contemporary organizations, forced by increased competition, changing market conditions, and rapid technological advances, to restructure in an attempt to meet the challenges posed by a rapidly changing external environment. Recognizes the importance of thinking about organizing from an open systems perspective. Concludes that networking is appropriate for a variety of organizations and may be modified to meet individual circumstances. Networking can be achieved locally, nationally, or internationally. Networking also can serve as a transitional stage to help organizations to become leaner, more innovative and responsive in order to meet today′s organizational challenge to change.
Article navigation
1 April 1993
Research Article|
April 01 1993
Networking in the Mid‐1990s Available to Purchase
Deborah A. Yarnell;
Deborah A. Yarnell
Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Mark F. Peterson
Mark F. Peterson
Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7492
Print ISSN: 0262-1711
© MCB UP Limited
1993
Journal of Management Development (1993) 12 (4): 37–48.
Citation
Yarnell DA, Peterson MF (1993), "Networking in the Mid‐1990s". Journal of Management Development, Vol. 12 No. 4 pp. 37–48, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000001398
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Academic libraries, people and change: a case study of the 1990s
Library Management (June,1998)
Building Successful New Businesses Within Established Firms; 10 Rules for Strategic Innovators
Human Resource Management International Digest (August,2006)
Focussed Energy: Mastering Bottom‐up Organisation
The TQM Magazine (February,2001)
Simplicity/complexity as a dimension of strategic focus: effect on performance in different organisational domains
Management Research News (July,1999)
Purpose: the human face of strategy
The Antidote (September,1998)
Related Chapters
Structural Versus Experienced Complexity: A New Perspective on the Relationship between Organizational Complexity and Innovation
Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Platforms
Slovak Innovation Ecosystem: Information Technology and Digital Innovations
Modeling Economic Growth in Contemporary Slovakia
Dynamic Conservatism: How Institutions Change to Remain the Same
Institutions and Ideals: Philip Selznick’s Legacy for Organizational Studies
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
