Uses survey research to investigate two general questions concerning managerial competencies and performance appraisal: whether a set of managerial competencies currently being used by organizations to describe successful managers can be identified; and whether organizations are appraising these same competencies as part of their managerial performance appraisal processes. The six competencies most often identified as critical to managerial success appear to be proper choices, given the discussion of the attributes needed for a competency to be effective. The results also show, however, that many of these same organizations are not appraising these competencies in their managerial‐performance appraisal processes. Concludes that failure to appraise the competencies reduces the effectiveness of the competencies and the managerial performance appraisal programs.
Article navigation
1 December 2001
Research Article|
December 01 2001
Managerial competencies and the managerial performance appraisal process
Steven E. Abraham;
Steven E. Abraham
School of Business, State University of New York at Oswego, New York, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Lanny A. Karns;
Lanny A. Karns
School of Business, State University of New York at Oswego, New York, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Kenneth Shaw;
Kenneth Shaw
School of Business, State University of New York at Oswego, New York, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Manuel A. Mena
Manuel A. Mena
School of Business, State University of New York at Oswego, New York, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7492
Print ISSN: 0262-1711
© MCB UP Limited
2001
Journal of Management Development (2001) 20 (10): 842–852.
Citation
Abraham SE, Karns LA, Shaw K, Mena MA (2001), "Managerial competencies and the managerial performance appraisal process". Journal of Management Development, Vol. 20 No. 10 pp. 842–852, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710110410842
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Liking and similarity as predictors of multi‐source ratings
Personnel Review (October,2002)
IDENTIFYING THE DEVILS
Management Development Review (December,1992)
The Differences between Appraisal Schemes: Variation and Acceptability– Part I
Personnel Review (December,1994)
Perception is reality: using 360‐degree appraisal against behavioural competences to effect organizational change and improve management performance
Career Development International (June,1996)
Accreditation, competence and digital portfolio assessment
On the Horizon (December,2003)
Related Chapters
How are they doing? The Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Develop a Strategic Performance Appraisal on Individual Level
A Focused Issue on Building New Competences in Dynamic Environments
Performance Management: A Marriage between Practice and Science – Just Say “I do”
Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management
Does professional accounting qualification matter for the provision of accounting services?
Accounting in Central and Eastern Europe
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
