Article navigation
Purpose

This study examines the potential drawbacks of work flexibility ability, defined as the ability of individuals to move between work and home domains. Drawing from job demands-resources theory, we test a model that demonstrates how flexibility can increase strain rather than mitigate it.

Design/methodology/approach

We utilized a three-wave panel of 266 employees from diverse occupations.

Findings

We find that work flexibility ability can increase telepressure – defined as a sense of preoccupation with work-related messages – but only among individuals with a high future focus. Furthermore, a greater sense of telepressure was linked to both exhaustion and work interference with family (WIF). Indirect effects revealed that for individuals with a high future focus, flexibility increased exhaustion and WIF via greater telepressure.

Practical implications

Employees utilizing flexible work policies can mitigate stress by setting clear boundaries with communication technology to avoid experiencing a chronic preoccupation with work.

Originality/value

This study highlights the paradoxical role of resources, such as flexibility in work arrangements, in facilitating both motivation and strain outcomes. It reveals that resources such as flexibility, when combined with a future temporal focus, can lead to exhaustion and WIF.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal