Decision styles and Machiavellianism were studied among four groups of managers in pharmaceutical companies. Using a Decision Styles Inventory, directive, analytic, conceptual and behavioural decision styles were studied, each representing a different combination of cognitive complexity and brain hemisphere preference in decision making. Machiavellianism was assessed using the Mach IV scale of Christie and Geiss (1970) and its components, namely, tactics, views and morality. The sample studied comprised 39 marketing, 23 financial, 35 medical and 21 operations managers. No significant interdependence was found between decision style, Machiavellianism and managerial group. Further research is recommended to investigate differences in decision style between managers and non‐managers, and to establish the effects of Machiavellianism in the workplace.
Article navigation
1 January 1990
Research Article|
January 01 1990
Managerial Decision Styles and Machiavellianism: A Comparative Study
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7778
Print ISSN: 0268-3946
© MCB UP Limited
1990
Journal of Managerial Psychology (1990) 5 (1): 9–16.
Citation
Shackleton D, Pitt L, Seidel Marks A (1990), "Managerial Decision Styles and Machiavellianism: A Comparative Study". Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 5 No. 1 pp. 9–16, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/02683949010139492
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions
International Journal of Manpower (November,2001)
Solving business problems using a lateral thinking approach
Management Decision (February,2010)
Perspectives on Accounting Systems and Human Behaviour
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability (December,1988)
Twenty that made history (key business decisions)
Strategic Direction (January,2006)
Trainings that Demystify Strategic Decision‐making Processes
Journal of Management Development (January,1989)
Related Chapters
Could the Level of Personal Indebtedness Influence an Auditor’s Professional Decision-Making Process?
Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting
Cross-Cultural Heterogeneity in Tourist Decision Making
Tourism Sensemaking: Strategies to Give Meaning to Experience
Why the Biomedical Research Ethics Model Is Inappropriate for Social Sciences: A Response to ‘Responsible to Whom? Obligations to Participants and Society in Social Science Research’ by Matt Sleat
Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
