This research assesses the Know, See, Plan, portions of the Know, See, Plan, Do (KSPD) model for curriculum design in leadership education. There were 3 graduate student groups, each taught using 1 of 3 different curriculum designs (KSPD and 2 control groups). Based on apre- test, post-test design, students’ performance was measured to assess their knowledge, and application skills of the course material. Results indicated MBA students taught based on a KSPD curriculum (Group 1) performed significantly better than students in the two control groups on 3 post-test dependent measures designed to capture the effectiveness of the Know, See, Plan curriculum design model, (basic leadership information (K1), recognition of leadership concepts in practice (S1), and developing a plan of action (P1)). Group 1 also performed significantly better on all 3 post-test measures than they performed on the 3 pre-test measures. The non-MBA control group (Group 2) improved significantly from pre-test to post test on P1 but not on S1 or K1. The MBA control group (Group 3) had no significant changes in performance from pre-test to post-test on any of the three dependent measures. These findings are discussed in terms of their support for the KSPD model and in regard to limitations of this study.
Article navigation
15 October 2016
Research Article|
October 15 2016
Empirical Test of the Know, See, Plan, Do Model for Curriculum Design in Leadership Education Open Access
Beth Ann Martin;
Beth Ann Martin
1
Professor of Psychology, John Carroll University
Search for other works by this author on:
Scott J. Allen
Scott J. Allen
2
Associate Professor of Management, John Carroll University
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing on behalf of Association of Leadership Educators
Copyright © 2016, The Journal of Leadership Education
2016
The Journal of Leadership Education
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/
Journal of Leadership Education (2016) 15 (4): 132–143.
Citation
Martin BA, Allen SJ (2016), "Empirical Test of the Know, See, Plan, Do Model for Curriculum Design in Leadership Education". Journal of Leadership Education, Vol. 15 No. 4 pp. 132–143, doi: https://doi.org/10.12806/V15/I4/A2
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Application of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) as the basis of the evaluation of the green building certification systems
Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management (March,2022)
Seismic behaviour of structural walls with specific details
Magazine of Concrete Research (October,2002)
Knowing and not knowing about algorithms
Journal of Documentation (December,2024)
Predicting the performance of undergraduate business students in introductory quantitative methods courses: The case of a private university in the UAE
Quality Assurance in Education (September,2013)
A new approach to determine the weights of project activities using data envelopment analysis: a case of Mobarakeh steel company
International Journal of Managing Projects in Business (May,2020)
Related Chapters
Charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leadership: where we are, and where do we need to go?
Multi-Level Issues in Organizational Behavior and Leadership
Levels of performance: multi-level perspectives on outstanding leadership
Multi-Level Issues in Organizational Behavior and Leadership
Presidential leadership styles: how do they map onto charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leadership?
Multi-Level Issues in Organizational Behavior and Leadership
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
