This paper aims to examine how observing workplace incivility shapes third parties’ expectations for their own future treatment and their evaluations of the employees, with a focus on perceptions of workplace status for victims.
Study 1 used a scenario-based experiment (n = 320) in which participants observed an interview between two managers that either included or did not include incivility. Participants then evaluated anticipated interpersonal justice, the workplace status of each manager and their preferred affiliation partner. Social dominance orientation was measured in a pre-experiment survey. Study 2 (n = 284) tested whether victim response type (passive, assertive or diplomatic) influenced status attribution and whether belief in a just world moderated the incivility−status relationship.
Across both studies, victims of incivility were perceived as having lower workplace status. In Study 1, observers also expected less interpersonal fairness for themselves after witnessing incivility. Contrary to predictions, victim response type did not restore perceived status, and neither social dominance orientation nor belief in a just world moderated the incivility–status relationship in the predicted direction.
This research demonstrates that observing workplace incivility leads third parties to infer lower status for victims, highlighting a previously underexamined social consequence of incivility.
