Faced with an ageing population and newspaper warnings that escalating costs are leading to a health crisis, debate has intensified in Australia and elsewhere on the allocation of limited health resources. But whose values should inform decision‐making in the health area, and should the influence of different groups vary with the level of decision‐making? These questions were put to 54 members of the public and health professionals in eight focus groups. Unlike previous studies, participants were not asked if particular groups should be involved in decisions but rather through deliberation and discussion nominated their own potential decision‐makers. This delivered a clear message that participants saw a legitimate role for a broad range of stakeholders in priority‐setting decisions. The results suggest that qualitative methods of investigation have the potential to improve the legitimacy and accountability of policy decisions by contributing to a better understanding of the values of the public and health professionals.
Article navigation
3 August 2008
Review Article|
August 03 2008
Health Care Decision‐Making ‐ A Focus Group Study Involving Health Professionals and the General Public Available to Purchase
Bradley Shrimpton;
Bradley Shrimpton
The University of Melbourne
Search for other works by this author on:
Rosalind Hurworth;
Rosalind Hurworth
The University of Melbourne
Search for other works by this author on:
Catherine Bell;
Catherine Bell
The University of Melbourne
Search for other works by this author on:
Jeff Richardson
Jeff Richardson
Monash University.
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1448-0980
Print ISSN: 1443-9883
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
2008
Qualitative Research Journal (2008) 8 (2): 43–58.
Citation
Shrimpton B, McKie J, Hurworth R, Bell C, Richardson J (2008), "Health Care Decision‐Making ‐ A Focus Group Study Involving Health Professionals and the General Public". Qualitative Research Journal, Vol. 8 No. 2 pp. 43–58, doi: https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0802043
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Does public consultation encourage social participation?
Journal of Enterprise Information Management (August,2018)
Narratives of public library roles and value: a critical discourse analysis of a public consultation on a new central library
Journal of Documentation (September,2025)
Participation asymmetry in EU AI governance: a longitudinal analysis of consultation demographics and regulatory outcomes
Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy (May,2026)
Prioritizing sustainability of renewable energy projects in Morocco
International Journal of Energy Sector Management (November,2024)
A rose by any other name may smell as sweet but “group discussion” is not another name for a “focus group” nor should it be
Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal (September,2005)
Related Chapters
Sociological Intervention as a Reaction to the Crisis of the City: Public Consultation in Warsaw
Public Spaces: Times of Crisis and Change
Un-Drowning the Transfer Process: Strategies to Aid Hispanic Transfer Students
Inquiries Into Literacy Learning and Cultural Competencies in a World of Borders
Models and Misperceptions: Chenery, Hirschman and Tinbergen on Development Planning
Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
