Skip to Main Content
Article navigation
Purpose

This study aims to challenge the fundamental assumption that high-performing employees are more loyal, revealing why traditional retention strategies may be failing and what HR leaders should do instead.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors analyzed 11,470 employees across two major data sets using survival analysis – a powerful technique that predicts not just who will leave, but when they’re most likely to go. This approach moves beyond simple yes/no predictions to provide timing insights crucial for proactive retention.

Findings

High performers leave at exactly the same rate as average performers. The biggest predictor of employee departure is not performance – it is overtime work, which increases turnover risk by 242%. Single employees and frequent business travellers also show dramatically higher attrition rates.

Practical implications

HR leaders should redirect retention budgets from performance-based bonuses to work-life balance initiatives. Companies implementing these findings could save millions in turnover costs while improving employee satisfaction.

Originality/value

This is the first large-scale study to definitively prove the “performance paradox” and provide HR professionals with a practical roadmap for implementing survival analysis in their retention strategies.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal