Article navigation
Purpose

Whereas the strength of most for‐profit enterprises is their management practice, a Bridgespan survey showed that non‐profits are best in visionary leadership, but often significantly under‐managed. This paper aims to describe how a few charismatic leaders recognize the crucial importance of improving their management capabilities so the organization will deliver great results over time.

Design/methodology/approach

Examples of five leading non‐profits are presented to show how management strengths can be added.

Findings

Key points learned by successful non‐profits are: understand the tension between leadership and management; get strategic clarity to make it easier to see how to achieve the desired impact by setting priorities, establishing performance measures, and making tradeoffs; anchor strategic clarity in a few key metrics, to keep everyone focused; build and align the team; and actively manage the change process.

Practical implications

Implementing this agenda in the context of nonprofit leadership is difficult. A framework is offered that illustrates the shift that many non‐profits need to work through in order to become a high performing organization.

Originality/value

When asked, non‐profit leaders profess that visionary leadership (with a compelling case for a cause) drives fundraising and recruitment of volunteers. But their management to deliver long‐term results is not as strong. Organizations must find a balance, with the goal of becoming both strongly led and strongly managed.

You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options