Skip to Main Content
Article navigation
Purpose

The purpose of this study is to examine how proactive personality moderates the negative impact of abusive supervision on employee job performance, how this moderating role is transmitted.

Design/methodology/approach

Using a sample of 305 supervisor-subordinate dyads in a two-wave survey, this study adopted a hierarchical regression analysis to test the hypotheses.

Findings

The results show that proactive personality moderates the negative relationship between abusive supervision and job performance such that the relationship is weaker for employees with high proactive personality than for those with low proactive personality. The moderating role of proactive personality between abusive supervision and job performance was mediated by job crafting (within of workplace) and leisure activity (outside of workplace).

Originality/value

The study helps to understand the moderating mechanism of boundary conditions in the relationship between abusive supervision and job performance, also understand the diversity of transmission mechanisms involved. In addition, this study enhances theory of proactive personality.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$41.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal