Article navigation
Purpose

This study examines agentic artificial intelligence (AI) as “digital employees” and extends learning & development (L&D) frameworks to include their training and ethical alignment.

Design/methodology/approach

A conceptual, theory-integrative approach is adopted, drawing on socio-technical systems theory and the resource-based view (RBV), supported by evidence such as bias on Airbnb.

Findings

Agentic AI systems act as organizational participants whose learning shapes decisions. Reframing their learning as an L&D responsibility requires core L&D activities to be rethought for non-human learners. Without governance, these systems may amplify bias.

Research limitations/implications

The study is conceptual and lacks empirical validation. Future research should test AI-focused L&D models and examine human-AI collaboration.

Practical implications

The study can be used to implement structured AI training, align systems with ethical norms, and strengthen governance for responsible AI use in organizations.

Originality/value

The paper reframes agentic AI as part of the workforce and extends L&D to include artificial agents, clarifying what the L&D function specifically gains from this perspective.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal