Skip to Main Content
Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to apply an innovative evolutionary approach based on a genetic algorithm (GA) for optimizing laser beam (LB) paths in laser-based additive manufacturing (LBAM) with the aim of minimizing deformation of the manufactured part and demonstrating the proposed approach by finite element modeling (FEM) simulations.

Design/methodology/approach

The study introduces a GA-based evolutionary approach for optimizing LB paths in LBAM processes. The optimization of the LB path is a critical factor influencing the quality of the additively manufactured part and the efficiency of the additive manufacturing (AM) process. This study approaches the problem by formulating the LB path optimization as a search for the optimal sequence of material deposition on a thin metal plate. The optimization objective is defined by a fitness function, which can be composed of various components. FEM simulations are applied to calculate the deformation of the metal plate due to laser deposition, based on which the fitness is calculated.

Findings

The findings of this study, using the thermo-mechanical simulation results, indicate the improvements in the final geometry of the metal plate, e.g. decrease in the plate deformation, if the LB path is optimized. The GA-based optimization approach for the LBAM process exhibits improvement over traditional trial-and-error LB path formulations due to the automation of the LB path selection and optimization. Therefore, the proposed approach provides an efficient automated selection of LB paths in LBAM.

Research limitations/implications

The study investigates the methods of optimizing the LB path in AM. The study is limited to numerical simulations, and future work will include extensive experimental validation to verify the proposed optimized LB path designs. The current study provides (via thermo-mechanical analysis) evidence of improvement in terms of deformation minimization for the considered part (metal plate).

Originality/value

The proposed LB path optimization framework provides a systematic and automated approach to optimizing the LBAM process. The efficacy of the proposed method is demonstrated by a thermo-mechanical simulation case study where a decrease in the final workpiece deformation is achieved. The simulations aim to identify LB paths that represent optimized solutions concerning the defined fitness criteria. The thermo-mechanical approach and the mechanism behind the reduced deformation are also discussed in detail.

Additive manufacturing (AM) technology provides fabrication of complex, custom-designed components and represents a key technology in the ongoing digital transformation, especially within the framework of Industry 4.0 (Blakey-Milner et al., 2021; Madhavadas et al., 2022). Laser-based additive manufacturing (LBAM) has emerged as a prominent approach within AM, and the key LBAM techniques, such as selective laser melting (SLM) (Lupi et al., 2023) and laser-based directed energy deposition (DED-LB) (Shamsaei et al., 2015; Svetlizky et al., 2022; Thompson et al., 2015), stand out for their ability to melt and deposit material layers with a low heat-affected zone, enabling the fabrication of complex three-dimensional structures.

Delamination and cracking during the AM process, as well as deformations such as warping, bending and overall geometrical inaccuracies of AM parts—which often cannot be eliminated even by heat treatment—remain key problems in LBAM. The rapid heating and cooling cycles inherent to LBAM, caused by the melting and solidification of metal powder, induce large temperature gradients. These, in turn, generate residual stresses that can compromise both the stability of the AM process and the dimensional accuracy and structural integrity of the final part. Therefore, controlling the temperature distribution during the deposition process is critical for producing high-quality and geometrically accurate 3D-AM parts and can be achieved by optimizing the laser beam (LB) path.

Numerous studies have demonstrated that the LB path significantly influences temperature distribution and, consequently, the magnitude and pattern of deformations in printed parts. Early work by Mercelis and Kruth (2006) identified residual stresses as a primary source of deformation in SLM-manufactured components and emphasized the laser scanning strategy as one of the key parameters affecting stress profiles. A comprehensive review by Wang et al. (2022) confirms that the path-dependent residual stress and deformation are two critical defects of the parts fabricated by direct energy deposition and that the optimal design of the scanning strategy is an important controlling method. Experimental studies confirm the strong correlation between scanning strategies and residual stress distribution, showing how these affect resulting part deformations (Bian et al., 2020; Carraturo et al., 2020).

The importance of integrating optimization techniques and predictive simulations to minimize residual stress and distortion has also been emphasized in recent studies (Dar et al., 2025; Potočnik et al., 2024; Twumasi et al., 2025). Liu et al. (2024) designed a parameter optimization algorithm to adjust the local scanning parameters to avoid defects and thus enhance the performance consistency of the formed parts. Twumasi et al. (2025) proposed a physics-guided, machine-learning approach to optimize scan paths for desired microstructure outcomes, using a surrogate machine learning model to reduce computational costs and deep reinforcement learning to generate optimized scan paths for target microstructure. These studies highlight the critical need for advanced numerical frameworks that incorporate deformation minimization into scan path planning—an objective directly addressed in the present work.

Evolutionary algorithms have been introduced for generating and optimizing DED-LB deposition head paths in AM (Nassehi et al., 2015), and various other approaches have been proposed for tool path planning, aiming to optimize temperature distribution in the built part (Ding et al., 2014; Ren et al., 2019; Ren et al., 2019). Evolutionary methods were also applied to enhance the thermo-mechanical properties in wire-arc AM by generating continuous optimized tool paths (Zhou et al., 2022). The impact of different scanning strategies on the thermo-mechanical behavior and geometrical accuracies of fabricated parts using SLM was examined in Jia et al. (2023).

Part distortion and geometrical inaccuracy remain a significant challenge in AM; therefore, novel slicing and path planning algorithms, such as non-planar AM, are promising potential tools for improving part accuracy when integrated into the pre-processing phase of 3D printing (Schaechtl et al., 2022). A novel adaptive toolpath generation algorithm in laser powder bed fusion was proposed by Qin et al. (2023). The method minimizes thermal gradients to reduce part distortion, incorporating collision-free and smoothing constraints combined with an island-based strategy, and experimental results show significantly reduced distortion compared to traditional methods, demonstrating effectiveness in AM of complex 3D parts. A multi-objective optimization framework was proposed by Jabón et al. (2023) in the combination of AM with topology optimization to reduce support structures by 30% on average while maintaining mass and only slightly decreasing part stiffness.

Xu et al. (2024) proposed stress-based continuous planar tool path planning for AM, which also presents a novel continuous planar path planning algorithm based on the principal stress orientation field to improve the structural performance of AM parts. The tool paths are generated with a genetic algorithm (GA) by minimizing the idle travel distance of the nozzle, and experimental results demonstrate that the objects fabricated with the proposed method have superior structural performance.

In order to avoid extensive experimental parameter studies in the AM design phase, an AM process-specific design based on numerical simulation is favorable. Poulhaon et al. (2024) proposed an incremental inherent stress model for the fast prediction of part distortion, which simulates the AM process bead-by-bead, accounting for thermo-mechanical coupling and inherent stress evolution, and the study demonstrated massive computational reduction with acceptable accuracy in predicting part distortion trends. Thermo-mechanical modeling of the DED-LB process has been discussed in various contexts. Temperature and residual stress prediction was investigated through finite element modeling (FEM) of the process in the case of a multi-material part, and a good correlation was found between the experimental and simulation results (Li et al., 2020). Temperature-induced residual stress and the resulting deformations are most commonly investigated in the DED-LB process, and finite element simulations have proved a good level of agreement between the temperature profiling and the respective distortion tendencies (Yang et al., 2016). A three-dimensional finite element approach was discussed for identifying the best DED-LB scanning strategy. Temperature histories and residual stresses were analyzed and validated with experimental results to identify the optimal DED-LB process parameters (Zhou et al., 2022).

This study builds upon previous research (Potočnik et al., 2024), where a method for GA-based optimization of LB path in AM was proposed. GA-based optimization was used to find the optimal LB path on a metal substrate to minimize a fitness function, which included thermal fitness (average thermal gradient) and process fitness (suitability for LBAM). In this study, the optimization framework is extended to directly optimize the deformation of the manufactured workpiece. The optimization method and the modifications applied in this study are described in Section 2. The estimation of the workpiece deformations is obtained by FEM thermo-mechanical simulations, as described in Section 3, and the results of the simulations are presented in Section 4. Finally, the conclusions of this study are summarized in Section 5.

The results of this research demonstrate that the GA-based LB path optimization can improve the structural response of the considered metal plate, e.g. decrease in the plate deformation. The proposed LB path optimization framework provides a systematic and automated approach to optimizing the LBAM process.

The method of GA-based optimization of LB paths (Potočnik et al., 2024) is used as an approach to enhance the properties of the AM part. The method involves generating LB paths by searching for the optimal sequence of LB irradiation that minimizes a fitness function, comprising thermal and process fitness components. Various path generators are applied alongside standard ones (e.g. raster, zigzag) to define the initial population of path solutions. A GA-based LB path optimization framework consists of the initialization of LB path solutions and the application of crossover and mutation operators through subsequent GA generations. The LB paths are progressively optimized according to the fitness function, and the method provides an automated approach to an efficient LB path selection in LBAM.

In this study, DED-LB-based deposition on a metal plate is considered, and the deposition geometry (on a grid of 30 × 30 elements, i.e. cells) consists of a frame at the borders of the metal plate, as shown in Figure 1. Figure 1a presents the design mask, Figure 1b the matrix formulation of an example of the LB path with numbers (visible in the zoomed area) denoting the subsequent LB locations, and Figure 1c shows the corresponding LB path, composed of two laser deposition segments, denoted in blue and red.

Figure 1
A diagram showing the design mask, the L B path matrix, and the L B path with labeled sections.The illustration consists of three sections, each labeled to represent different stages in a design and path calculation process. (a) The “design mask” is on the left, displaying a large square grid with smaller squares in a light green color. In the center of the grid, there is a large red rectangular area, which likely represents the selected region of the design mask. (b) The “L B path matrix” is in the middle, showing a similar outer boundary in light green, and the central part is shaded in gray. At the center, a rectangular matrix is shown, which consists of 6 columns and 5 rows. The matrix contains the following values: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (top row); 116, 171, 170, 169, 168, 167 (second row); 115, 172 (third row); 114, 173 (fourth row); and 113, 174 (fifth row), arranged in a structured format. The matrix has an arrow pointing towards the boundary from the top left. (c) The “L B path” is shown on the right side, where a square grid, similar to the one in section (a), outlines a rectangular path. The path is outlined with both red and blue borders: the red border marks the inner edge, and the blue border marks an outer boundary. The L B path is visualized with sharp corners and straight edges, defining a clear rectangular path. This section also includes a grid of smaller squares that provides a sense of scale.

(a) The design mask operator, (b) LB path matrix and (c) the corresponding LB path. Source: Authors’ own work

Figure 1
A diagram showing the design mask, the L B path matrix, and the L B path with labeled sections.The illustration consists of three sections, each labeled to represent different stages in a design and path calculation process. (a) The “design mask” is on the left, displaying a large square grid with smaller squares in a light green color. In the center of the grid, there is a large red rectangular area, which likely represents the selected region of the design mask. (b) The “L B path matrix” is in the middle, showing a similar outer boundary in light green, and the central part is shaded in gray. At the center, a rectangular matrix is shown, which consists of 6 columns and 5 rows. The matrix contains the following values: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (top row); 116, 171, 170, 169, 168, 167 (second row); 115, 172 (third row); 114, 173 (fourth row); and 113, 174 (fifth row), arranged in a structured format. The matrix has an arrow pointing towards the boundary from the top left. (c) The “L B path” is shown on the right side, where a square grid, similar to the one in section (a), outlines a rectangular path. The path is outlined with both red and blue borders: the red border marks the inner edge, and the blue border marks an outer boundary. The L B path is visualized with sharp corners and straight edges, defining a clear rectangular path. This section also includes a grid of smaller squares that provides a sense of scale.

(a) The design mask operator, (b) LB path matrix and (c) the corresponding LB path. Source: Authors’ own work

Close modal

In general, a matrix formulation of LB paths can be used for the description of different initial LB paths, representing the initial population of solutions in GA-based optimization. However, for the manipulation of LB paths by GA operators (crossover, mutation), it is more suitable that the LB paths are represented by strings (Potočnik et al., 2024).

The GA provides a global optimization solver for smooth or non-smooth optimization problems with any type of constraint (Goldberg and Holland, 1989), and GA-based methods have already been proposed in the context of AM (Liu et al., 2021; Moussa and ElMaraghy, 2020; Vaissier et al., 2019). The GA starts by creating an initial population of solutions, and then this population is repeatedly modified by crossover and mutation operators. In each generation, the best solutions are selected according to the fitness function to produce children for the next generation, and the population evolves over successive generations toward an optimal solution.

2.3.1 Initialization

Various standard path generators (raster, zigzag, spiral, etc.) are used to define the initial population of LB path solutions. Additionally, a stochastic-based search path generator was introduced (Potočnik et al., 2024), which is designed to search for random and preferably long continuous paths within the available path design topology (determined by the design mask).

2.3.2 Fitness

In contrast to our previous study (based on thermal and process fitness), the fitness J in this research is based on the evaluation of the structural fitness of LB path solutions, which is expressed as the maximum deformation of the AM part in the vertical direction (δz):

(1)

Low values of the fitness J correspond to overall low deformation of the workpiece, and therefore the optimization procedure aims at minimizing the fitness value J.

2.3.3 Crossover

The crossover operator combines genetic information (i.e. segments of LB paths) from two parent solutions and generates one or more offspring. Figure 2 illustrates the crossover operation by combining two parent solutions (Figure 2a and b) into a child LB path (Figure 2c).

Figure 2
A diagram with three labeled paths, featuring parent 1, parent 2, and child L B paths in different color combinations.The illustration displays three distinct labeled parts, each with a stepped design. In the left part (a), labeled “Parent hash 1 L B path,” the shape is a square grid with dashed lines outlining the perimeter. The grid is filled with smaller squares, and the outline of the square is drawn with an alternating red inner edge and blue outer dashed boundary, with each side of the square having the same color alternations. The grid appears within a light grey background, and the outline includes small rectangular blocks at each corner and side, all positioned symmetrically within the grid. In the middle part section (b), labeled “Parent hash 2 L B path,” another square grid appears with a similar layout to the first section, but with the dashed lines in alternating blue and red colors. The left edge is shown in a red boundary, while the right edge is shown in blue. The top and bottom edges are shown in a U-pattern; the left half is in a red boundary, and the right half is in a blue boundary. The square grid structure remains the same, and small rectangular blocks are present at each corner and side of the square, similarly positioned within the grid structure. In the right part (c), labeled “Child L B path,” the square grid follows a similar structure to the first two sections. The left edge is shown in a red boundary, while the right edge is shown in a blue boundary. The top and bottom edges are shown in red on the left side in a U-pattern, while they are shown in blue in a straight pattern on the right half.

The crossover operation combines the parent LB paths (a) and (b) into a child LB path (c), with color indicating segment order from blue (first) to red (last). Source: Authors’ own work

Figure 2
A diagram with three labeled paths, featuring parent 1, parent 2, and child L B paths in different color combinations.The illustration displays three distinct labeled parts, each with a stepped design. In the left part (a), labeled “Parent hash 1 L B path,” the shape is a square grid with dashed lines outlining the perimeter. The grid is filled with smaller squares, and the outline of the square is drawn with an alternating red inner edge and blue outer dashed boundary, with each side of the square having the same color alternations. The grid appears within a light grey background, and the outline includes small rectangular blocks at each corner and side, all positioned symmetrically within the grid. In the middle part section (b), labeled “Parent hash 2 L B path,” another square grid appears with a similar layout to the first section, but with the dashed lines in alternating blue and red colors. The left edge is shown in a red boundary, while the right edge is shown in blue. The top and bottom edges are shown in a U-pattern; the left half is in a red boundary, and the right half is in a blue boundary. The square grid structure remains the same, and small rectangular blocks are present at each corner and side of the square, similarly positioned within the grid structure. In the right part (c), labeled “Child L B path,” the square grid follows a similar structure to the first two sections. The left edge is shown in a red boundary, while the right edge is shown in a blue boundary. The top and bottom edges are shown in red on the left side in a U-pattern, while they are shown in blue in a straight pattern on the right half.

The crossover operation combines the parent LB paths (a) and (b) into a child LB path (c), with color indicating segment order from blue (first) to red (last). Source: Authors’ own work

Close modal

2.3.4 Mutation

The mutation operator introduces additional diversity into the population by randomly altering the genetic material of the selected parent LB path to generate a child LB path. Figure 3 shows an example of a mutation operation that introduces small random changes to explore the search space and potentially find better solutions. To show the progression of the LB path, the path segments in Figures 2 and 3 are denoted with blue for the first deposited segment, red for the last segment and shades of purple for the intermediate segments.

Figure 3
A diagram showing the parent and child L B paths with respective blue and red dashed outlines.The illustration displays a diagram with two square grids side by side. On the left side, labeled “(a) Parent L B path,” there is a square grid with a blue boundary and red inner edge consisting of both dashed and solid lines. The dashed lines form the boundaries in red and blue, while the solid lines mark the square grid. Inside the grid, the space remains empty, with no internal markings. On the right side, labeled “(b) Child L B path,” another square grid is displayed with a red outline. Similar to the Parent L B path, the Child L B path grid also features a combination of dashed and solid lines, with the dashed lines forming the outer boundary and solid lines marking the inner boundary. The inner edge is red, and the outer boundary is also mostly red on three sides, except the right side, which is blue.

The mutation operation is applied to a parent LB path (a) to generate a new child LB path (b), with color indicating segment order from blue (first) to red (last). Source: Authors’ own work

Figure 3
A diagram showing the parent and child L B paths with respective blue and red dashed outlines.The illustration displays a diagram with two square grids side by side. On the left side, labeled “(a) Parent L B path,” there is a square grid with a blue boundary and red inner edge consisting of both dashed and solid lines. The dashed lines form the boundaries in red and blue, while the solid lines mark the square grid. Inside the grid, the space remains empty, with no internal markings. On the right side, labeled “(b) Child L B path,” another square grid is displayed with a red outline. Similar to the Parent L B path, the Child L B path grid also features a combination of dashed and solid lines, with the dashed lines forming the outer boundary and solid lines marking the inner boundary. The inner edge is red, and the outer boundary is also mostly red on three sides, except the right side, which is blue.

The mutation operation is applied to a parent LB path (a) to generate a new child LB path (b), with color indicating segment order from blue (first) to red (last). Source: Authors’ own work

Close modal

In this study, the following modifications (with respect to our previous study (Potočnik et al., 2024)) were introduced to implement the optimization framework based on the FEM thermo-mechanical simulations.

  1. Fitness in this study (as explained above) consists of structural evaluation only (e.g. maximum workpiece deformation).

  2. Elimination of singleton deposition points, namely path generators, crossover and mutation operators, can (due to the stochastic nature of operations) introduce LB paths with several disconnected points (singletons). This is unfavorable both from the point of view of LBAM process implementation, as well as for the FEM simulations, where a single-point deposition cannot be implemented, and laser-based depositions are only available as lines. Previously, the process fitness was applied to penalize unfavorable LB paths, and in this study, the process fitness is directly integrated into the path-generating procedure, which is upgraded as follows:

    1. Identify singletons in an LB path.

    2. For each singleton, search for adjacent path segments and try to connect the singleton to the beginning or end of one of the adjacent path segments.

    3. Repeat the procedure until all singletons are fused to adjacent path segments.

  3. Adding random path generators (in combination with the previous point (b)) provides additional expressiveness of the GA optimization in the exploration of the available space of potential solutions.

The principal equations that are a basis for the thermo-mechanical FEM in this study are presented below. The equation for heat conduction through a solid is given as follows (Li et al., 2020; Megahed et al., 2016):

(2)

where k is the thermal conductivity (W/K.m), T is the temperature (K), q is the rate of heat flux/convection/radiation/internal heat generation inside the volume (W), ρ is the density of the material (kg/m3), c is the specific heat of the material (J/kg.K), t is the time (s) and is the divergence. k2T represents the rate of heat conduction and ρcTt is the rate of energy storage inside the volume, which represents the transient term in the simulation.

Temperature and heat flow analysis from the transient thermal model are required to compute the thermal expansion in the entire domain and thus define the thermo-mechanical properties. The mesh type and geometry remain the same throughout the simulation. The Lagrangian framework has been applied, as it has been widely adopted for modeling deformation in such applications. The governing mechanical equilibrium equation for stress is given as:

(3)

where σ is the stress tensor associated with the material behavior law and fint is the internal forces. Strain and stress tensors are linked by the equation:

(4)

where C is the fourth-order material stiffness tensor and ϵe is the second-order elastic strain tensor. Total strain tensor ϵ is composed of three components namely elastic strain tensor (ϵe), plastic strain tensor (ϵp) and thermal strain tensor (ϵth) as follows:

(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)

where E is the Young’s modulus, v is the Poisson’s coefficient, g(σy) is a function associated with the material behavior, σy is the yield stress, α is the thermal expansion coefficient, θ is the nodal temperature and θo is the initial temperature.

The described thermo-mechanical model is used in an FEM simulation, where a substrate of 100 × 100 × 2 mm is chosen and the DED-LB cladding is performed in this area. The clad is in the form of a square strip of dimensions 90 mm × 90 mm, as shown in Figure 1a. The height of the deposited clad is 1 mm. G-codes are created to define the various user-defined LB paths and are given as inputs to the model. Both the substrate and the deposited material in the form of a single clad were meshed with hexahedral elements of 1 mm thickness. Multiple element sizes were tested, and it was observed that the current size had a good balance between the accuracy and the computational load required for simulations. This meshing resulted in an element count of 21,992. In the coordinate system, deposition is defined in both x and y directions, while the z-axis defines the clad height. The material deposition rate for the simulation is set as 7.5 mm3/sec, and the initial cladding started at room temperature (23 °C). One of the sides of the substrate is constrained to restrict its deformation. The substrate and the deposited material are SS316L, which has a melting point of 1,370 °C. The simulation parameters were intentionally selected to amplify deformation effects (e.g. thin substrate, high deposition rate, minimal constraints) in order to provide a clear proof of concept for evaluating the impact of LB path optimization. Figure 4 shows the AM part, which consists of a thin substrate and a deposited layer, with an example of the deposited clad pattern indicated in green.

Figure 4
A diagram showing the laser path, substrate, and deposited layer with labeled sections.The illustration shows a square layout with a gray background representing the “substrate.” Within the substrate, there is a green laser path that follows a detailed, rectangular pattern along the inner edges of the square. The path forms a continuous, winding line that is slightly offset from the edges of the square. The “laser path” is outlined in green and is positioned centrally within the square, with some parts of it curving and others running straight along the edges. At the top and bottom edges of the square, there is a thin gray area, which is the “deposited layer.” This deposited layer is evenly distributed along the borders of the substrate, except where the laser path runs. On the left side of the square, there is a label “Fixed support” that points towards the outer left edge, which is enclosed in a dotted rectangle.

AM part geometry: substrate and an example of the deposited clad pattern. Source: Authors’ own work

Figure 4
A diagram showing the laser path, substrate, and deposited layer with labeled sections.The illustration shows a square layout with a gray background representing the “substrate.” Within the substrate, there is a green laser path that follows a detailed, rectangular pattern along the inner edges of the square. The path forms a continuous, winding line that is slightly offset from the edges of the square. The “laser path” is outlined in green and is positioned centrally within the square, with some parts of it curving and others running straight along the edges. At the top and bottom edges of the square, there is a thin gray area, which is the “deposited layer.” This deposited layer is evenly distributed along the borders of the substrate, except where the laser path runs. On the left side of the square, there is a label “Fixed support” that points towards the outer left edge, which is enclosed in a dotted rectangle.

AM part geometry: substrate and an example of the deposited clad pattern. Source: Authors’ own work

Close modal

FEM simulations were performed in Ansys Mechanical. The simulation process involves transient thermal simulations followed by static structural simulations. Temperature distribution, heat flow and heat flux are computed during the transient thermal simulations. Mechanical behavior aspects such as deformation, stress, strain, etc. are the output of static structural simulations. The element birth and death technique is used to simulate the DED-LB progression. The LB diameter of 1.5 mm is represented by 3 elements, and 1 mm thickness of the clad layer is represented by 1 element. Elements of the substrate are all active prior to the simulation, whereas the elements of the clad layer are activated according to the provided LB path.

The above-described FEM simulations were combined with the GA-based optimization framework presented in Section 2. The initial population of solutions was defined by 9 different LB paths, which consisted of standard paths (raster, zigzag, spiral-in, spiral-out) and several randomly generated paths. Starting from the initial population of solutions, the GA-based evolution was performed. For each LB path solution, the FEM thermo-mechanical simulation was conducted to estimate the maximum substrate deformation (after the finalized deposition), which provides the fitness value J (Eq. (1)) of the solution. After the evaluation of the fitness function J of the initial population, i.e. the first generation of 9 LB path solutions, the next generation was generated by using the crossover and mutation operators. GA-based evolution was followed up to 15 generations. In each generation, novel LB path solutions were generated, and successful solutions were propagated into the subsequent generations by the elitist strategy.

Figure 5 shows an example of an undeformed part (grey color) before deposition and a deformed AM part (in colored scale) showing deformation δz of the part after the DED-LB process. The largest deformation δz occurs on the right side of the workpiece due to the clamping of the substrate on the left side to the fixed support.

Figure 5
A 3 D model shows a substrate with a deposited layer, fixed support, and labels for before and after deposition.The image illustrates a 3 D simulation of a substrate with a deposited layer. The substrate is shown at an angle, with the “Fixed support” label pointing to the left edge, enclosed in a dotted rectangle. The right edge is raised above the left edge. The “Substrate before deposition” is flat at the bottom and is shown in gray, while “Substrate after deposition” is slightly curved on the right side and shown in multiple color regions over its surface. A rectangular band over the substrate is positioned along all sides, forming a boundary and labeled “Deposited layer.” The color changes from blue on the left to light blue when moving to the right, then transitions into green, light green, yellow, orange, and red at the right corners. At the bottom right side, the side view of the substrate is shown. The gray deposition is flat and shown at the bottom, while the multiple-color deposition is in a tilted position, which is raised from the right with a height of “delta subscript z.”

The geometry of the substrate before (in grey color) and after the deposition (in colored scheme). Source: Authors’ own work

Figure 5
A 3 D model shows a substrate with a deposited layer, fixed support, and labels for before and after deposition.The image illustrates a 3 D simulation of a substrate with a deposited layer. The substrate is shown at an angle, with the “Fixed support” label pointing to the left edge, enclosed in a dotted rectangle. The right edge is raised above the left edge. The “Substrate before deposition” is flat at the bottom and is shown in gray, while “Substrate after deposition” is slightly curved on the right side and shown in multiple color regions over its surface. A rectangular band over the substrate is positioned along all sides, forming a boundary and labeled “Deposited layer.” The color changes from blue on the left to light blue when moving to the right, then transitions into green, light green, yellow, orange, and red at the right corners. At the bottom right side, the side view of the substrate is shown. The gray deposition is flat and shown at the bottom, while the multiple-color deposition is in a tilted position, which is raised from the right with a height of “delta subscript z.”

The geometry of the substrate before (in grey color) and after the deposition (in colored scheme). Source: Authors’ own work

Close modal

Figure 6 shows GA-based evolution results and the best fitness values for 15 GA generations. For each generation, a boxplot shows the minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile and maximum fitness values (outliers are marked by red crosses). In the initial population (1st generation), the spiral-in LB path resulted in the highest deformation (δz = 6.7 mm), and the best result (15th generation) showed reduced deformation (δz = 4.9 mm), which is a 33.7% improvement with respect to the initial LB path with the highest deformation and an 8.5% improvement with respect to the best LB path (δz = 5.4 mm) of the 1st generation. The green line in Figure 6 shows the minimum fitness (deformation) of each generation. Although the generation mean value of J does not decrease monotonically with subsequent generations (due to exploration), we can conclude from the monotonic decrease of the minimum fitness J that the GA-based optimization of the LB path provides a useful tool for minimizing the deformation of the AM part in the laser-based AM process.

Figure 6
A line and box plot showing fitness (deformation) versus generation, with min fitness indicated.The illustration displays a combined line and box plot with labeled axes, illustrating “Fitness (Deformation)” on the vertical axis, which ranges from 4.8 to 6.8 with an interval of 0.2. The horizontal axis is labeled “Generation,” ranging from 1 to 15 with an interval of 1. The box plots, outlined in blue, represent the spread of fitness values for each generation. Each box includes a red horizontal line, indicating the median fitness value for that generation, with the top and bottom “whiskers” showing the range of fitness values within 1.5 times the interquartile range. Data points that fall outside this range are marked as red crosses, representing outliers. The boxes in the early stages, from 1 to 3, and at generations 10 and 11 are larger than the other boxes. The green line with a square marker, labeled “min fitness per generation,” tracks the minimum fitness value for each generation, beginning slightly below 5.4 at generation 1 and gradually stabilizing around 5.1 at generation 2, then decreasing between 5 and 7 generations and reaching around 4.95, which remains constant till generation 15. Note: All numerical data values are approximated.

LB path optimization results in terms of fitness per generation. Boxplot for each generation shows minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile and maximum fitness values. The minimal values in each generation (green) provide results with the least deformation. Source: Authors’ own work

Figure 6
A line and box plot showing fitness (deformation) versus generation, with min fitness indicated.The illustration displays a combined line and box plot with labeled axes, illustrating “Fitness (Deformation)” on the vertical axis, which ranges from 4.8 to 6.8 with an interval of 0.2. The horizontal axis is labeled “Generation,” ranging from 1 to 15 with an interval of 1. The box plots, outlined in blue, represent the spread of fitness values for each generation. Each box includes a red horizontal line, indicating the median fitness value for that generation, with the top and bottom “whiskers” showing the range of fitness values within 1.5 times the interquartile range. Data points that fall outside this range are marked as red crosses, representing outliers. The boxes in the early stages, from 1 to 3, and at generations 10 and 11 are larger than the other boxes. The green line with a square marker, labeled “min fitness per generation,” tracks the minimum fitness value for each generation, beginning slightly below 5.4 at generation 1 and gradually stabilizing around 5.1 at generation 2, then decreasing between 5 and 7 generations and reaching around 4.95, which remains constant till generation 15. Note: All numerical data values are approximated.

LB path optimization results in terms of fitness per generation. Boxplot for each generation shows minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile and maximum fitness values. The minimal values in each generation (green) provide results with the least deformation. Source: Authors’ own work

Close modal

From the literature (Ren et al., 2019), it is known that temperature distribution in the built part is closely connected to mechanical deformation. With respect to this, temperature distribution of the plates at the end of the AM process at time 271.4 s is shown for the best GA-based LB path with the lowest deformation (δz = 4.9 mm) and spiral-in LB path with the highest deformation (δz = 6.7 mm) in Figure 7a and b, respectively. Color bands in the figure indicate that the plate with the least deformation (Figure 7a) exhibits higher temperatures at the end of the AM process when compared to the plate with maximum deformation (Figure 7b). A maximum temperature of 877.1 °C was observed for the plate with the least deformation and 806.5 °C for the plate with the highest deformation.

Figure 7
A plot shows temperature versus time with two contour plots and labeled paths for best and worst L B.The illustration presents a graph with “Temperature (degrees Celsius)” on the vertical axis, which ranges from 200 to 900 with an interval of 100. The horizontal axis is labeled “Time (seconds),” ranging from 270 to 340 with an interval of 10. The legend on the top right clarifies the labeling of the paths as “The best L B path” in a green line and “The worst L B path” in a red line. The green curve starts above 850 at time 272 and decreases rapidly to around 490, and then bends towards the right and still decreases gradually, which ends around 260 near the time of 332. The red curve starts around 800 at time 272 and decreases rapidly to around 380, and then bends towards the right and still decreases gradually, which ends around 230 near the time of 332. Above the curves, two heat maps are shown related to the green and red curves. Both substrates are rectangular, and a rectangular deposition layer is placed on their top surfaces. A color scale on the left ranges from 100 in blue at the bottom to 1000 in red at the top. The left substrate is labeled “at the rate t equals 271.4 seconds.” It is shown in the light blue and green region with a small red patch at the top left corner. The central region is shown in blue in a circular pattern, which is merged at the front edge. The right substrate is labeled “at the rate t equals 271.4 seconds.” It is shown in the light blue and green region with a small red patch at the bottom right corner. The central region is shown in blue in a circular pattern. Note: All numerical data values are approximated.

Temperature distribution at the end of the AM process: (a) for the best LB path and (b) for the worst LB path. The maximum temperatures of the plates during the cooling phase (starting at the end of the AM process at time 271.4 s) are shown by a green line for the best LB path (lowest deformation) and by a red line for the worst LB path (highest deformation). Source: Authors’ own work

Figure 7
A plot shows temperature versus time with two contour plots and labeled paths for best and worst L B.The illustration presents a graph with “Temperature (degrees Celsius)” on the vertical axis, which ranges from 200 to 900 with an interval of 100. The horizontal axis is labeled “Time (seconds),” ranging from 270 to 340 with an interval of 10. The legend on the top right clarifies the labeling of the paths as “The best L B path” in a green line and “The worst L B path” in a red line. The green curve starts above 850 at time 272 and decreases rapidly to around 490, and then bends towards the right and still decreases gradually, which ends around 260 near the time of 332. The red curve starts around 800 at time 272 and decreases rapidly to around 380, and then bends towards the right and still decreases gradually, which ends around 230 near the time of 332. Above the curves, two heat maps are shown related to the green and red curves. Both substrates are rectangular, and a rectangular deposition layer is placed on their top surfaces. A color scale on the left ranges from 100 in blue at the bottom to 1000 in red at the top. The left substrate is labeled “at the rate t equals 271.4 seconds.” It is shown in the light blue and green region with a small red patch at the top left corner. The central region is shown in blue in a circular pattern, which is merged at the front edge. The right substrate is labeled “at the rate t equals 271.4 seconds.” It is shown in the light blue and green region with a small red patch at the bottom right corner. The central region is shown in blue in a circular pattern. Note: All numerical data values are approximated.

Temperature distribution at the end of the AM process: (a) for the best LB path and (b) for the worst LB path. The maximum temperatures of the plates during the cooling phase (starting at the end of the AM process at time 271.4 s) are shown by a green line for the best LB path (lowest deformation) and by a red line for the worst LB path (highest deformation). Source: Authors’ own work

Close modal

Deformation phenomena appear throughout the printing process, but large gradients during the cooling phase considerably affect the deformation behavior (Kim et al., 2014). Temperature conditions are further characterized by an evaluation of the maximum temperature of both plates throughout the cooling phase (starting at time 271.4 s), as presented in green and red color lines in Figure 7 for the best LB path and the worst LB path. Temperature plots for both LB paths indicate that a higher and rapid heat dissipation in the workpiece (red line) might contribute towards a higher deformation, whereas the workpiece with the low deformation dissipates heat at a lower rate and tends to stay at higher temperatures longer (green line). Higher cooling rates lead to a higher thermal gradient, thereby increasing the chances of deformation leading to warping. The best (GA-generated) LB path enables slower cooling of the workpiece, thus ensuring uniform heat dissipation throughout the surface, and the results obtained are in agreement with the mechanism discussed in the literature (Bai et al., 2023).

Figure 8 presents the temporal evolution of the maximum temperature over the free edge of the workpiece which is furthest away from the fixed support. The temperature plots are shown for the LB paths with a) the best fitness (final GA result) and b) the worst fitness (spiral-in). The peaks indicate the melting point (1,370 °C) at which the element cluster is generated. The best LB path reveals more dispersed temperature peaks compared to the worst LB path which results in only a few condensed high-temperature areas. The plots also display the moving minimum values of the temperature in blue color. The continuous path (spiral-in) does not enable the distribution of heat uniformly throughout the plate as it follows a fixed path with no scope for flexibility to alter its characteristics. Whereas the optimal path (GA result) enables uniform and balanced distribution of heat throughout the plate. The optimal path is not continuous as it is comprised of a multiple-segmented path, and these segments enable a higher level of flexibility with respect to location and direction, such that material deposition is arranged in a more distributed way throughout the plate. It can be presumed that the more distributed temperature peaks at the furthest edge from the fixed support result in overall smaller workpiece deformation.

Figure 8
A set of plots comparing the best and worst L B paths with a moving minimum temperature trend.The illustration consists of two plots that display temperature data over time. In both plots, the horizontal axis is labeled “Time (seconds),” ranging from 0 to 350 with an interval of 50, while the vertical axis is labeled “Temperature (degrees Celsius),” ranging from 0 to 1500 with an interval of 500. In the top plot (a), two curves are shown, which include a green line labeled “The best L B path” and a blue line labeled “Moving Min.” The graph shows a series of green vertical bands that range from 500 to 1300, and it is dense between the times of 50 and 225. The blue curve starts from the origin and fluctuates with multiple peaks lying just below the green bars, which range between 0 and 500, and ends at around 250 at the time of 325. In the bottom plot (b), two curves are shown, which include a red line labeled “The worst L B path” and a blue line labeled “Moving Min.” The graph shows three vertical bands that range from 500 to 1350, and the thick band is present between 140 and 180. The blue curve starts from the origin and fluctuates with peaks lying just below the red bars, which range between 0 and 500, and ends at around 250 at the time of 325. Note: All numerical data values are approximated.

Temperature evolution of the free edge of the plate for the LB paths with (a) the best fitness (min deformation) and (b) the worst fitness (max deformation). Source: Authors’ own work

Figure 8
A set of plots comparing the best and worst L B paths with a moving minimum temperature trend.The illustration consists of two plots that display temperature data over time. In both plots, the horizontal axis is labeled “Time (seconds),” ranging from 0 to 350 with an interval of 50, while the vertical axis is labeled “Temperature (degrees Celsius),” ranging from 0 to 1500 with an interval of 500. In the top plot (a), two curves are shown, which include a green line labeled “The best L B path” and a blue line labeled “Moving Min.” The graph shows a series of green vertical bands that range from 500 to 1300, and it is dense between the times of 50 and 225. The blue curve starts from the origin and fluctuates with multiple peaks lying just below the green bars, which range between 0 and 500, and ends at around 250 at the time of 325. In the bottom plot (b), two curves are shown, which include a red line labeled “The worst L B path” and a blue line labeled “Moving Min.” The graph shows three vertical bands that range from 500 to 1350, and the thick band is present between 140 and 180. The blue curve starts from the origin and fluctuates with peaks lying just below the red bars, which range between 0 and 500, and ends at around 250 at the time of 325. Note: All numerical data values are approximated.

Temperature evolution of the free edge of the plate for the LB paths with (a) the best fitness (min deformation) and (b) the worst fitness (max deformation). Source: Authors’ own work

Close modal

This study presents an application of a GA-based evolutionary approach for optimizing LB paths in LBAM. The method aims to minimize the deformation in the AM part by automating the selection of optimal LB paths. Numerical FEM thermo-mechanical simulations validated the effectiveness of this approach, showing a reduction in deformation of a substrate compared to the initial (standard and random) LB paths. The best result of the 15th generation showed reduced deformation (δz = 4.9 mm) which is a 33.7% improvement with respect to the initial LB path with the highest deformation, and an 8.5% improvement with respect to the best LB path of the 1st generation.

The proposed approach offers a systematic and automated method for LB path optimization, which represents an advancement over existing techniques. The study highlights the important role of optimizing LB paths in enhancing the overall quality and efficiency of the LBAM process. By optimizing the sequence of DED-LB, based on defined fitness criteria, the study provides evidence of improved structural outcomes in LBAM. The current study provides (via thermo-mechanical analysis) evidence of improvement in terms of deformation minimization for the considered AM part (cladded metal plate). Although the research is currently limited to FEM thermo-mechanical simulation results, it lays a foundation for future experimental validation to further verify and refine the proposed GA-based optimization strategy.

Future work will focus on experimental validation of the proposed optimization framework, including the fabrication of physical samples using the optimized LB paths and the assessment of resulting deformation and microstructure. This will allow for verification of simulation results and exploration of how the LB path influences grain morphology, residual stresses and mechanical properties of the part.

Overall, this study contributes valuable insights into the automated optimization of LB paths in AM by presenting a framework that has the potential to enhance LBAM processes and improve part quality by minimizing deformation.

Bai
,
R.
,
Liang
,
G.
,
Cheng
,
H.
,
Naceur
,
H.
,
Coutellier
,
D.
,
Zhao
,
J.
,
Luo
,
J.
,
Pu
,
H.
and
Yi
,
J.
(
2023
), “
Optimizing additive manufacturing path pattern for Ti-6Al-4V thin rods using a combinatorial radial basis function surrogate-assisted genetic algorithm
”,
Materials and Design
, Vol. 
236
, 112447, doi: .
Bian
,
P.
,
Shi
,
J.
,
Liu
,
Y.
and
Xie
,
Y.
(
2020
), “
Influence of laser power and scanning strategy on residual stress distribution in additively manufactured 316L steel
”,
Optics and Laser Technology
, Vol. 
132
, 106477, doi: .
Blakey-Milner
,
B.
,
Gradl
,
P.
,
Snedden
,
G.
,
Brooks
,
M.
,
Pitot
,
J.
,
Lopez
,
E.
,
Leary
,
M.
,
Berto
,
F.
and
du Plessis
,
A.
(
2021
), “
Metal additive manufacturing in aerospace: a review
”,
Materials and Design
, Vol. 
209
, 110008, doi: .
Carraturo
,
M.
,
Jomo
,
J.
,
Kollmannsberger
,
S.
,
Reali
,
A.
,
Auricchio
,
F.
and
Rank
,
E.
(
2020
), “
Modeling and experimental validation of an immersed thermo-mechanical part-scale analysis for laser powder bed fusion processes
”,
Additive Manufacturing
, Vol. 
36
, 101498, doi: .
Dar
,
J.
,
Ponsot
,
A.G.
,
Jolma
,
C.J.
and
Lin
,
D.
(
2025
), “
A review on scan strategies in laser-based metal additive manufacturing
”,
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
, Vol. 
36
, pp. 
5425
-
5467
, doi: .
Ding
,
D.
,
Pan
,
Z.
,
Cuiuri
,
D.
and
Li
,
H.
(
2014
), “
A tool-path generation strategy for wire and arc additive manufacturing
”,
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
, Vol. 
73
Nos
1-4
, pp. 
173
-
183
, doi: .
Goldberg
,
D.E.
and
Holland
,
J.H.
(
1989
),
Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning
,
Addison-Wesley Professional
,
Reading, MA
.
Jabón
,
J.
,
Corbera
,
S.
,
Barea
,
R.
and
Martín-Rabadán
,
J.
(
2023
), “
An evolutive-deformation approach to enhance self-supporting areas in additive manufacturing designs
”,
Computers and Industrial Engineering
, Vol. 
182
, 109386, doi: .
Jia
,
Y.
,
Zeng
,
C.
and
Xue
,
J.
(
2023
), “
Scanning strategy optimization for the selective laser melting additive manufacturing of Ti6Al4V
”,
Engineering Research Express
, Vol. 
5
No. 
1
, p.
015041
, doi: .
Kim
,
Y.-C.
,
Hirohata
,
M.
and
Inose
,
K.
(
2014
), “
FEM simulation of distortion and residual stress generated by high energy beam welding with considering phase transformation
”,
Open Journal of Metal
, Vol. 
4
No. 
2
, pp. 
31
-
39
, doi: .
Li
,
L.
,
Zhang
,
X.
,
Cui
,
W.
,
Liou
,
F.
,
Deng
,
W.
and
Li
,
W.
(
2020
), “
Temperature and residual stress distribution of FGM parts by DED process: modeling and experimental validation
”,
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
, Vol. 
109
Nos
1-2
, pp. 
451
-
462
, doi: .
Liu
,
N.
,
Ren
,
K.
,
Zhang
,
W.
,
Zhang
,
Y.F.
,
Chew
,
Y.X.
,
Bi
,
G.J.
and
Fuh
,
J.Y.H.
(
2021
), “
An evolutional algorithm for automatic 2D layer segmentation in laser-aided additive manufacturing
”,
Additive Manufacturing
, Vol. 
47
, 102342, doi: .
Liu
,
Y.
,
Li
,
J.
,
Cheng
,
T.
,
Fan
,
Z.
,
Li
,
W.
,
Xia
,
W.
and
Wei
,
Q.
(
2024
), “
Parameter automatic optimization strategy for laser powder bed fusion using neural network infrared radiation intensity prediction model
”,
Additive Manufacturing
, Vol. 
92
, 104373, doi: .
Lupi
,
F.
,
Pacini
,
A.
and
Lanzetta
,
M.
(
2023
), “
Laser powder bed additive manufacturing: a review on the four drivers for an online control
”,
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
, Vol. 
103
, pp. 
413
-
429
, doi: .
Madhavadas
,
V.
,
Srivastava
,
D.
,
Chadha
,
U.
,
Aravind Raj
,
S.
,
Sultan
,
M.T.H.
,
Shahar
,
F.S.
and
Shah
,
A.U.M.
(
2022
), “
A review on metal additive manufacturing for intricately shaped aerospace components
”,
CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology
, Vol. 
39
, pp. 
18
-
36
, doi: .
Megahed
,
M.
,
Mindt
,
H.W.
,
N’Dri
,
N.
,
Duan
,
H.
and
Desmaison
,
O.
(
2016
), “
Metal additive-manufacturing process and residual stress modeling
”,
Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation
, Vol. 
5
No. 
1
, pp. 
61
-
93
, doi: .
Mercelis
,
P.
and
Kruth
,
J.P.
(
2006
), “
Residual stresses in selective laser sintering and selective laser melting
”,
Rapid Prototyping Journal
, Vol. 
12
No. 
5
, pp. 
254
-
265
, doi: .
Moussa
,
M.
and
ElMaraghy
,
H.
(
2020
), “
A genetic algorithm-based model for product platform design for hybrid manufacturing
”,
Procedia CIRP
, Vol. 
93
, pp. 
389
-
394
, doi: .
Nassehi
,
A.
,
Essink
,
W.
and
Barclay
,
J.
(
2015
), “
Evolutionary algorithms for generation and optimization of tool paths
”,
CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, CIRP
, Vol. 
64
No. 
1
, pp. 
455
-
458
, doi: .
Potočnik
,
P.
,
Jeromen
,
A.
and
Govekar
,
E.
(
2024
), “
Genetic algorithm-based framework for optimization of laser beam path in additive manufacturing
”,
Metals
, Vol. 
14
No. 
4
, p.
410
, doi: .
Poulhaon
,
F.
,
Springer
,
S.
,
Gruber
,
T.
,
Lasnik
,
M.
,
Oberwinkler
,
B.
and
Joyot
,
P.
(
2024
), “
Incremental inherent stress model for the fast prediction of part distortion made via wire arc additive manufacturing
”,
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
, Vol. 
121
, pp. 
136
-
149
, doi: .
Qin
,
M.
,
Qu
,
S.
,
Ding
,
J.
,
Song
,
X.
,
Gao
,
S.
,
Wang
,
C.C.L.
and
Liao
,
W.H.
(
2023
), “
Adaptive toolpath generation for distortion reduction in laser powder bed fusion process
”,
Additive Manufacturing
, Vol. 
64
, 103432, doi: .
Ren
,
K.
,
Chew
,
Y.
,
Fuh
,
J.Y.H.
,
Zhang
,
Y.F.
and
Bi
,
G.J.
(
2019a
), “
Thermo-mechanical analyses for optimized path planning in laser aided additive manufacturing processes
”,
Materials and Design
, Vol. 
162
, pp. 
80
-
93
, doi: .
Ren
,
K.
,
Chew
,
Y.
,
Zhang
,
Y.F.
,
Bi
,
G.J.
and
Fuh
,
J.Y.H.
(
2019b
), “
Thermal analyses for optimal scanning pattern evaluation in laser aided additive manufacturing
”,
Journal of Materials Processing Technology
, Vol. 
271
, pp. 
178
-
188
, doi: .
Schaechtl
,
P.
,
Schleich
,
B.
and
Wartzack
,
S.
(
2022
), “
On the potential of slicing algorithms in additive manufacturing for the optimization of geometrical part accuracy
”,
Procedia CIRP
, Vol. 
114
, pp. 
215
-
220
, doi: .
Shamsaei
,
N.
,
Yadollahi
,
A.
,
Bian
,
L.
and
Thompson
,
S.M.
(
2015
), “
An overview of direct laser deposition for additive manufacturing; part II: mechanical behavior, process parameter optimization and control
”,
Additive Manufacturing
, Vol. 
8
, pp. 
12
-
35
, doi: .
Svetlizky
,
D.
,
Zheng
,
B.
,
Vyatskikh
,
A.
,
Das
,
M.
,
Bose
,
S.
,
Bandyopadhyay
,
A.
,
Schoenung
,
J.M.
,
Lavernia
,
E.J.
and
Eliaz
,
N.
(
2022
), “
Laser-based directed energy deposition (DED-LB) of advanced materials
”,
Materials Science and Engineering
, Vol. 
840
, 142967, doi: .
Thompson
,
S.M.
,
Bian
,
L.
,
Shamsaei
,
N.
and
Yadollahi
,
A.
(
2015
), “
An overview of direct laser deposition for additive manufacturing; part I: transport phenomena, modeling and diagnostics
”,
Additive Manufacturing
, Vol. 
8
, pp. 
36
-
62
, doi: .
Twumasi
,
A.
,
Roy
,
P.C.
,
Li
,
Z.
,
Bhattacharjee
,
S.S.
and
Gan
,
Z.
(
2025
), “
Laser scan path design for controlled microstructure in additive manufacturing with integrated reduced-order phase-field modeling and deep reinforcement learning
”,
pp. 1-15
.
Vaissier
,
B.
,
Pernot
,
J.P.
,
Chougrani
,
L.
and
Véron
,
P.
(
2019
), “
Genetic-algorithm based framework for lattice support structure optimization in additive manufacturing
”,
CAD Computer Aided Design
, Vol. 
110
, pp. 
11
-
23
, doi: .
Wang
,
J.
,
Zhang
,
J.
,
Liu
,
G.
,
Liang
,
L.
,
Yang
,
G.
,
Huang
,
A.
and
Pang
,
S.
(
2022
), “
Effects of scanning strategies on residual stress and deformation by high-power direct energy deposition: island size and laser jump strategy between islands
”,
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
, Vol. 
75
, pp. 
23
-
40
, doi: .
Xu
,
W.
,
Xu
,
H.
,
Li
,
Q.
,
Zhang
,
P.
,
Yang
,
L.
and
Wang
,
W.
(
2024
), “
Stress-based continuous planar path planning for additive manufacturing
”,
Advances in Engineering Software
, Vol. 
188
, 103544, doi: .
Yang
,
Q.
,
Zhang
,
P.
,
Cheng
,
L.
,
Min
,
Z.
,
Chyu
,
M.
and
To
,
A.C.
(
2016
), “
Finite element modeling and validation of thermomechanical behavior of Ti-6Al-4V in directed energy deposition additive manufacturing
”,
Additive Manufacturing
, Vol. 
12
, pp. 
169
-
177
, doi: .
Zhou
,
J.
,
Barrett
,
R.A.
and
Leen
,
S.B.
(
2022
), “
Three-dimensional finite element modelling for additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V components: effect of scanning strategies on temperature history and residual stress
”,
Journal of Advanced Joining Processes
, Vol. 
5
, 100106, doi: .
Zhou
,
Z.
,
Shen
,
H.
,
Lin
,
J.
,
Liu
,
B.
and
Sheng
,
X.
(
2022
), “
Continuous tool-path planning for optimizing thermo-mechanical properties in wire-arc additive manufacturing: an evolutional method
”,
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
, Vol. 
83
, pp. 
354
-
373
, doi: .
Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at Link to the terms of the CC BY 4.0 licence.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal