The article considers the change in power that will result from the Education Reform Act 1988. It is argued that as a result of two features in particular (Local Management of Schools and the National Curriculum)a three‐level hierarchy (DES‐LEA‐School) stands to be replaced by a two‐level hierarchy (DES and School). The implications of LEAs ceasing to be line managers in the system are considered; the sanctions they have been offered are too Draconian (suspending a school′s devolved powers, for example), to represent a policy execution tool. The performance indicators currently being devised by LEAs are criticised because they come too late when a school′s performance will be determined by its ability to attract and retain pupils. LEAs will have no alternative but to pass most resources on to schools according to a pupil‐based formula. It is the consumers who will determine the performance indicators of a school.
Article navigation
1 April 1989
Research Article|
April 01 1989
LMS, the LEA and Performance Indicators
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6518
Print ISSN: 0951-354X
© MCB UP Limited
1989
International Journal of Educational Management (1989) 3 (4)
Citation
Dennison W (1989), "LMS, the LEA and Performance Indicators". International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 3 No. 4 pp. No Pagination Specified, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000001956
Download citation file:
160
Views
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Local government fraud: the Roslyn School District case
Management Research Review (March,2010)
The evolution of benchmarking in UK local authorities
Benchmarking: An International Journal (December,2002)
Using the statutory audit to support continuous improvement in Scottish local authorities
International Journal of Public Sector Management (December,2001)
Performance measurement and accountability in Victorian local government
International Journal of Public Sector Management (December,1999)
The Federal Government in Public Education: An Appropriate Role
International Journal of Educational Management (April,1993)
Related Chapters
Measuring Public Value in Bureaucratic Settings: Opportunities and Constraints
Public Value Management, Measurement and Reporting
Micropolitics: A New Model of Status Hierarchies in Teams
Looking Back, Moving Forward: A Review of Group and Team-Based Research
The Far-Reaching Effects of Power: At the Individual, Dyadic, and Group Levels
Looking Back, Moving Forward: A Review of Group and Team-Based Research
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
