Unfair and deceptive marketing claims are becoming a mainstay of product liability litigation in the United States, and therefore, marketing experts will continue to play a significant role in these cases. Too often, judges permit individuals with no legitimate expertise in marketing to offer expert opinions about the intent and effect of a defendant company's advertisements. Many times, these opinions are premised on unscientific research or even no research at all. To protect the legitimacy of the marketing discipline, not to mention the litigation process, judges, lawyers, and marketing professionals should apply more stringent standards when determining who qualifies as a marketing expert and when assessing whether that expert's opinions have a legitimate basis.
Article navigation
1 October 2004
Review Article|
October 01 2004
Marketing experts' misplaced expertise in the courtroom
Stephen J. McConnell;
Stephen J. McConnell
Dechert LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Jennifer E. Dubas
Jennifer E. Dubas
Dechert LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 2052-1200
Print ISSN: 0736-3761
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
2004
Journal of Consumer Marketing (2004) 21 (6): 378–380.
Citation
McConnell SJ, Dubas JE (2004), "Marketing experts' misplaced expertise in the courtroom". Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 21 No. 6 pp. 378–380, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760410558645
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Quality concepts and products litigation
The TQM Magazine (August,1999)
Vicarious franchisor liability: marketing and public policy implications
Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing (October,1997)
Selling drugs online: distribution‐related legal/regulatory issues
International Marketing Review (August,2001)
What does Merck & Co. v. Reynolds mean for the future of the statute of limitations defense in securities fraud litigation?
Journal of Investment Compliance (September,2010)
DRM, law and technology: an American perspective
Online Information Review (February,2007)
Related Chapters
The Effects of Offshoring Audit Tasks on Jurors’ Evaluations of Damage Awards Against Auditors
Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research
Music identities, individualization, and ownership shifts: Empowering a litigious paradigm of copyright protection
Music and Law
Does Web Disclosure of Environmental Information Affect Litigation Awards?
Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
