Skip to Main Content
Article navigation

Microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) is extensively used for soil stabilisation, sand erosion control, bioremediation and concrete repair. However, detailed bibliometric studies on MICP are scarce, particularly regarding industrial feedstocks, such as urea for ureolytic bacteria and calcium chloride, and the associated ammonia gas production, which poses challenges for large-scale applications. This study reviews 857 articles from the Scopus database (2000–2024), using the VOSviewer software to visualise data on publications, citations, authors, countries, journals, trending keywords and research topics. Significant global collaboration is evident, led by China and the USA. The most cited papers discuss ureolytic microorganisms enhancing soil properties, the basic MICP process, reducing concrete damage, improving soil and groundwater systems and the impacts of MICP on urea hydrolysis and ammonia production. Key terms such as ‘calcium carbonate’, ‘ammonia’ and ‘Sporosarcina pasteurii’ are central to MICP research. Co-occurrence analysis highlights thematic clusters such as microbial cementation and geological features, emphasising the multidisciplinary role of MICP in tackling environmental problems. This review highlights the need to mitigate environmental impacts, particularly those of ammonia production and energy use, in ureolytic MICP. Life-cycle assessments reveal that while ureolytic MICP reduces carbon dioxide emissions, it often consumes more energy, necessitating alternative nutrient sources and cost-effective practices for large-scale applications.

Since the start of the twenty-first century, the global economic growth has been increased significantly by robust infrastructure development, particularly in densely populated developing regions. This rapid growth has introduced various engineering challenges such as soil stabilisation, water conservation, structural repairs and hazardous waste management (Omoregie et al., 2024). As a result, there is a shift towards more sustainable practices such as microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP), which offers an eco-friendly solution for enhancing soil stability and reducing environmental harm (Sharma, 2024).

There are three prominent methods for MICP, which include the use of ureolytic bacteria for the degradation of urea (CO(NH2)2); the use of denitrifying bacteria, which carry out dissimilation of nitrates; and the use of aerobic non-ureolytic bacteria, which participate in the carbon cycle by oxidizing organic carbon (Justo-Reinoso et al., 2021; Whitaker et al., 2018). Each method utilises different microbial metabolic pathways to induce the precipitation of calcium carbonate (CaCO3), a process that has significant applications in soil stabilisation, concrete repair and environmental remediation (Bagga et al., 2022; Tan et al., 2023a, 2023b).

MICP using ureolytic bacteria such as Sporosarcina pasteurii has been extensively researched for decades. Urease breaks down urea, raising pH and forming calcium carbonate, which strengthens soil and reduces permeability and stabilise soils (Justo-Reinoso et al., 2023; Omoregie et al., 2024). Denitrifying bacteria such as Pseudomonas denitrificans reduce nitrate to nitrogen gas, increasing pH and promoting calcium carbonate formation, beneficial for water bioremediation and soil stabilisation (Tsesarsky et al., 2018). Non-ureolytic bacteria such as Sporosarcina ureae use organic carbon to produce carbonate ions, forming calcium carbonate and enhancing concrete durability and environmental bioremediation (Chaurasia et al., 2019; Lee and Gomez, 2024). This review provides a strategic comparison of MICP across different metabolic pathways, focusing on the bacteria involved, required environmental conditions, various applications, environmental impact, scalability and more.

MICP is widely used in geotechnical engineering and environmental management for its effectiveness in stabilising soil slopes, improving expansive soil properties and mitigating erosion (Behzadipour et al., 2020). It also plays a crucial role in environmental remediation, including carbon dioxide (CO2) sequestration, heavy metal removal and dust control. The success of MICP depends on accurately managing ureolysis kinetics, the supply of urea and calcium chloride (CaCl2), the distribution of reactants and injection rates, all of which are crucial for optimal calcium carbonate formation and distribution (Bao et al., 2017). These factors are crucial to enhancing the effectiveness of MICP and ensuring the long-term durability and sustainability of treated materials and infrastructure (Bahmani et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2021a).

Conventional MICP with ureolytic bacteria rapidly forms calcium carbonate but produces significant ammonia (NH3), posing environmental risks and weakening concrete strength (Li et al., 2011). Ammonia emissions can harm ecosystems and human health, affecting air and water quality (Ganendra et al., 2015; Lala and El-Sayed, 2015). To address this, modifications to the MICP process or alternative methods are needed to minimise ammonia emissions while effectively stabilising soil and repairing concrete (Basri et al., 2023; Omoregie et al., 2023a, 2024). Managing the environmental impact of ammonia is crucial for the sustainability and acceptance of MICP technology (Dawoud et al., 2014; Fauriel and Laloui, 2012).

While current research acknowledges the environmental drawbacks of traditional ground improvement methods and highlights the growing use of MICP to mitigate these issues (Carter et al., 2023; Omoregie et al., 2024), there is still a noticeable lack of detailed analysis in the literature on the global research scope of MICP, particularly its use of urea for ureolytic bacteria, which eventually produces ammonia and calcium chloride from industrial sources as a calcium supplement (Omoregie et al., 2023b, 2024). The Scopus database, known for its extensive coverage and meticulous curation, provides a detailed perspective on MICP research, which is crucial for accurate bibliometric analysis (Choi et al., 2020; Konstantinou and Wang, 2023). Its global scope and sophisticated search capabilities enable a deep dive into the trends, gaps and collaborations across various research domains, enhancing understanding of MICP applications and developments (Omoregie et al., 2024).

Scopus was selected for its exceptional coverage of scientific publications, far exceeding that of other databases such as Web of Science (WoS), which is limited by a maximum of 50 search terms. It offers an array of valuable bibliometric tools, including citation counts, H-index and SCImago Journal Rank, which are crucial for comprehensive research analysis (Alhassan et al., 2024). Scopus’s extensive catalogue of documents, such as journal articles, conference proceedings and book chapters, significantly enhances its utility for detailed bibliometric studies (Visser et al., 2021). In contrast, Google Scholar, with its broader but less regulated content, includes lower-impact journals and unpublished materials, making it less suitable for rigorous bibliometric analysis (Leydesdorff et al., 2013). Dimensions AI strives for comprehensive coverage but has not yet achieved the depth provided by Scopus, which could impact the accuracy and completeness of research studies (Singh et al., 2021). Furthermore, integrating data from different databases such as WoS and Scopus introduces complexities such as biases in search string selection and the potential for human error in data processing, complicating the comparative assessment of databases (Kumpulainen and Seppänen, 2022; Singh et al., 2021). Given its extensive international coverage, robust citation tracking, user-friendly interface and consistent data integrity, Scopus was deemed the most suitable database for conducting a study on the dynamics of MICP.

The objectives of this study are to identify key research trends, uncover existing gaps and examine collaborations in MICP research and different methodologies, specifically focusing on the use of urea and ammonia production. Utilising data from the Scopus database from 2000 to 2024, this research employs bibliometric analysis through the VOSviewer tool (version 1.6.19). This analysis aims to delineate research trends, identify gaps and reveal interdisciplinary connections within MICP research. The importance of this bibliometric analysis lies in its ability to deepen understanding of MICP with different metabolic pathways, providing a comprehensive view of the research landscape. This, in turn, guides and shapes future research directions in this evolving field. Figure 1 shows a detailed road map of this review paper for better understanding of the flow of work and analysis.

Figure 1

Detailed road map of the review paper

Figure 1

Detailed road map of the review paper

Close modal

This study utilised the Scopus database to analyse thoroughly the global research advancements and trends in MICP research. The bibliometric data were extracted from Scopus as of 7 June 2024. To ensure comprehensive coverage, multiple keyword sets pertinent to the research topic were used to retrieve relevant publications from this scientific database. The search was conducted using the following command: TITLE-ABS-KEY ((MICP) OR (microbial and induced and carbonate and precipitation) OR (microbial and induced and calcite and precipitation) OR (microbially and induced and calcium and carbonate and precipitation) AND (urea) OR (urease and activity) OR (ammonia) OR (calcium and chloride) OR (biocementation) OR (biomineralisation) OR (bacteria) OR (sporosarcina and pasteurii) OR (soil) OR (sand) OR (bacillus species) OR (urea and hydrolysis) OR (non-ureolytic) OR (crystal distribution) OR (industry chemicals) OR (soil stabilisation) OR (ground improvement) OR (urea hydrolysis) OR (ureolytic) OR (crystal growth) OR (bioremediation) OR (biogeotechnics) OR (biocementation) OR (pollution and control) OR (crystal and precipitation)). Employing Boolean operators ‘OR’ and ‘AND’ in the Scopus database search enhances the functionality and precision of the queries (de Souza Oliveira Filho and Pereira, 2021). The selected keywords give a detailed insight into MICP-related research, particularly focusing on the supply of urea and calcium chloride from industry, ammonia production during the MICP process, environmental impact and the characteristics of ureolytic bacteria. This research aims to examine the ways in which MICP using ureolytic bacteria modifies cementation in geomaterials, potentially influencing groundwater quality, ammonia production and the management of environment resources.

The search query in the Scopus database yielded 3070 documents, with 897 (29.22%) of these available as open access. These open-access articles were further broken down into categories: gold (517), green (356), bronze (87) and hybrid Gold (145). A vast majority of the indexed publications, 2879 (93.77%), were in English, with the remainder in various languages, including Chinese (181) and smaller counts in Polish (3), French (2), Korean (2), Russian (1), Portuguese (1), Japanese (1), Italian (1), German (1) and Azerbaijani (1) languages. The documents spanned several subject areas, with earth and planetary sciences (1333), engineering (1031) and environmental science (729) being the most prominent. The search was refined further using the Scopus tool to focus specifically on articles published between 2000 and 2024, primarily those in English language.

The VOSviewer software (version 1.6.19), developed at Leiden University in the Netherlands, is a robust tool used extensively for visualising bibliometric networks (Visser et al., 2021). It runs on the Java platform and supports the creation of detailed visual maps from bibliographic data, such as co-authorship and keyword co-occurrence networks. In the VOSviewer software, different elements such as co-authorship, bibliographic coupling and co-citation are visually distinguished using nodes shaped as circles or rectangles (Muniz and Oliveira-Filho, 2023; Purba et al., 2022). The size of each node indicates the strength of its connections, with larger nodes suggesting higher centrality (Visser et al., 2021). Lines between nodes depict relationships, with thicker lines showing stronger connections (Omoregie et al., 2022). This visualisation helps in analysing the relationships and link strength among various entities such as countries, authors, journals or keywords, facilitating the grouping of related items based on the strength and frequency of their connections, thereby providing valuable insights into the structure of a research field (Hasan et al., 2023; Hong et al., 2023).

In this study, co-authorship analysis revealed 2882 authors, with 144 of them meeting the collaboration threshold of at least two documents. Similarly, analysis of countries showed 60 countries involved, with 59 reaching the minimum threshold of one document for collaboration. In the co-occurrence analysis of author keywords, 4897 keywords were identified, with 484 keywords meeting the minimum occurrence threshold of five. The analysis of text data from titles and abstracts found 16 649 terms, with 345 terms surpassing the threshold of 15 occurrences. The VOSviewer software selected 207 of these terms as the most relevant, representing 60% of the key terms for further analysis. The co-citation analysis of cited authors involved 30 492 individuals, with 191 authors meeting the citation threshold of 100. Additionally, the co-citation analysis of cited references showed 30 313 references, with 29 references exceeding the citation threshold of 25. Bibliographic coupling analysis included 245 journals, with 21 journals meeting the collaboration threshold of ten documents, and analysis of countries through bibliographic coupling identified 60 countries, with 28 meeting the collaboration threshold of five documents. These analyses offer crucial insights into scholarly interactions and patterns of research.

MICP using ureolytic bacteria, particularly S. pasteurii, is the most used method in research over the past three decades (Justo-Reinoso et al., 2023). This process relies on the enzyme urease breaking down urea into ammonia and carbonic acid, which then forms bicarbonate (Omoregie et al., 2024). These chemical reactions increase pH, promoting calcium carbonate formation when soluble calcium is present (Achal et al., 2011; Omoregie et al., 2024). The resulting calcium carbonate biominerals fill soil pores, cementing particles together, thereby strengthening the soil, increasing its stiffness and reducing permeability (Omoregie et al., 2024).

Denitrifying bacteria, such as P. denitrificans, facilitate MICP by reducing nitrate to nitrogen gas, consuming protons and increasing pH, which promotes calcium carbonate precipitation in the presence of calcium ions (Tsesarsky et al., 2018). This process is beneficial for bioremediating nitrate-contaminated water, stabilising soil and enhancing concrete properties, particularly where urea-based processes are unsuitable (O’Donnell and Kavazanjian, 2015; O’Donnell et al., 2017a).

Non-ureolytic bacteria, such as S. ureae and Leuconostoc mesenteroides, use organic carbon for metabolism to produce carbonate ions, which react with calcium (Ca2+) ions to form calcium carbonate (Chaurasia et al., 2019; Yu et al., 2022). This method is applied in enhancing concrete durability, stabilising construction materials and bioremediating environments contaminated with heavy metals, offering an alternative MICP pathway where ureolytic or denitrifying processes are not feasible (Hemayati et al., 2023; Lee et al., 2017; Omoregie et al., 2021; Tan et al., 2023b).

Figure 2 shows the trends in publications and citations within the research area, attracting significant academic interest. Initially, the Scopus database yielded 3070 documents and publications using a specific search string. After refining the search parameters to focus solely on articles, limit the language to English, target journal articles as the source type and eliminate irrelevant papers using their Electronic Identifier, the data set was narrowed down to 857 articles with a total of 70 570 citations. This meticulous refinement was crucial to ensuring a more precise and relevant data set for the bibliometric analysis, enabling a focused examination of citation trends pertinent to the study. Such precision in selecting the data set is vital to ensure that the analysis accurately reflects publications that directly address the research objectives.

Figure 2

Trends in publications and citations from 2000 to 2024

Figure 2

Trends in publications and citations from 2000 to 2024

Close modal

MICP publications rose from just two in 2000 and 2003 to 475 in 2023. Citations followed, starting at 25 in 2000 and peaking at 16 933 in 2023. A significant increase began in 2013, with rapid growth until 2018, and continued climbing post-2021, indicating ongoing research potential. This trend underscores the need for greener MICP methods, avoiding urea and ammonia. Publication and citation counts have surged from double digits to thousands, reflecting escalating interest and impact.

The H-index of 93 from Scopus indicates high productivity and impact, with many documents cited at least 93 times. While many articles have garnered citations, recent publications have not yet been cited due to their newness. Earlier publications show varied citation counts, reflecting periods of high and modest impact. This fluctuation highlights the dynamic nature of academic research, influenced by relevance, visibility and ongoing academic discussions.

Figure 2 shows that while predictions for publication and citation trends in 2024 are possible, they should be approached with caution, given that the 2024 data cover only just less than the first half of the year. These early data indicate 260 publications and 9519 citations, suggesting that research activity and its impact are likely to continue growing; a prediction of more than 530 publications with around 20 000 citations can be made for 2024. However, these forecasts must be interpreted carefully due to the limited scope of the data and potential unforeseen factors that could alter research trends, akin to disruptions seen during the Covid-19 pandemic (Omoregie et al., 2024). This emphasises the importance of ongoing monitoring and analytical efforts to refine these forecasts and adapt to shifts in the research landscape. Keeping a vigilant eye on these dynamics ensures that the role of MICP within scientific discourse remains relevant and well understood, highlighting the necessity for continuous adaptation in response to emerging trends and data (Omoregie et al., 2024).

Figure 3 shows that ureolytic bacteria have consistently been the most studied metabolic pathway in MICP research, with publications growing from just a few in the early 2000s to over 100 per year by 2024 (Gat et al., 2011). This reflects extensive research interest and applications in geotechnical engineering (Jiang et al., 2016). Denitrifying bacteria are the second most researched pathway, showing a steady but slower increase in publications, particularly noticeable from the mid-2010s, reaching around 45 publications by 2024 (Huang et al., 2024; Zango et al., 2018). Non-ureolytic bacteria are the least researched, with a gradual rise in publications starting around the 2010s and reaching approximately 30 by 2024 (Hemayati et al., 2023). These data highlight that while ureolytic bacteria dominate MICP research, there is growing interest in alternative pathways such as denitrifying and non-ureolytic bacteria, albeit at a slower pace (Fahimizadeh et al., 2022; Tan et al., 2023b), and thus presents opportunities for further research to improve or verify their performances in terms of efficiency and environmental friendliness.

Figure 3

Number of publications with different MICP pathways between 2000 and 2024

Figure 3

Number of publications with different MICP pathways between 2000 and 2024

Close modal

From 2000 to 2024, MICP research has significantly evolved, aligning with the increasing focus on sustainable practices in construction and environmental management. The early years from 2000 to 2007 marked the inception of MICP research, with studies primarily examining the basic properties of microbial species and their chemical processes. The following era, from 2008 to 2014, witnessed substantial growth in MICP research, fuelled by innovations in biotechnology and environmental engineering. Between 2015 and 2019, the field saw further maturation, concentrating on the practical implementation and scalability of MICP in real-world projects. The most recent phase, from 2020 to 2024, has seen a rapid expansion and diversification of MICP research, spurred by the need for more sustainable environmental solutions. This period has been characterised by the exploration and development of new MICP methods. Further insights into the progression of this research are detailed in the following sections.

Table 1 highlights the top ten cited articles in MICP research from 2000 to 2024. DeJong et al. (2006) explored the use of ureolytic microorganisms to enhance soil properties such as non-collapse strain softening and cemented sand behaviour. De Muynck et al. (2010) reviewed how the choice of microbial strains affects MICP. Harkes et al. (2010) focused on optimising bacterial fixation in porous media to prevent clogging and achieve homogeneous reinforcement. Whiffin et al. (2007) quantified stiffness increase as a function of grouting agent volume and distance from injection points. Al Qabany et al. (2012) found that lower chemical concentrations improved calcite distribution at low cementation levels. Cheng et al. (2013) noted higher soil strength at a similar calcium carbonate content under low saturation. Al Qabany and Soga (2013b) showed that strength increase depends on chemical concentration. Mortensen and Dejong (2011) highlighted environmental conditions affecting ureolytic activity. Anbu et al. (2016) discussed key properties for MICP performance, including permeability and calcium carbonate content.

Table 1

List of the highest cited articles in the research domain

Title of articleYearCitationsReferences
Microbially induced cementation to control sand response to undrained shear20061249DeJong et al. (2006) 
Microbial carbonate precipitation in construction materials: a review20101095De Muynck et al. (2010) 
Quantifying biomediated ground improvement by ureolysis: large-scale biogrout experiment2010732Van Paassen et al. (2010a) 
Fixation and distribution of bacterial activity in sand to induce carbonate precipitation for ground reinforcement2010584Harkes et al. (2010) 
Factors affecting efficiency of microbially induced calcite precipitation2012571Al Qabany et al. (2012) 
Cementation of sand soil by microbially induced calcite precipitation at various degrees of saturation2013565Cheng et al. (2013) 
Formations of calcium carbonate minerals by bacteria and its multiple applications2016468Anbu et al. (2016) 
Effect of chemical treatment used in MICP on engineering properties of cemented soils2013461Al Qabany and Soga (2013a) 
Effects of environmental factors on microbial induced calcium carbonate precipitation2011457Mortensen et al. (2011) 
Experimental optimization of microbial-induced carbonate precipitation for soil improvement2013423Martinez et al. (2013) 

MICP research has attracted global attention, with involvement from 59 countries. In Figure 4, China leads with 325 publications, followed by the USA with 218. Other notable contributors include India (85), Singapore (44), Japan (42), Australia (56) and the UK (39). Countries such as Malaysia (34), Nigeria (24), South Korea (22), Canada (19), Switzerland (16), Taiwan (14), the Netherlands (13) and France (10) also contribute. Some countries such as Indonesia, Italy, Qatar, Poland, Portugal, New Zealand, Hong Kong and Sri Lanka show minimal output, highlighting regional variations in research intensity.

Figure 4

Global distribution of 59 countries contributing publications to MICP research

Figure 4

Global distribution of 59 countries contributing publications to MICP research

Close modal

Countries such as China, the USA, India, the UK and Australia lead MICP research, reflecting global interest. China and the USA, with robust resources and funding, conduct detailed studies on MICP alternatives to urea usage and ammonia production, influencing global MICP technology development. Nations with fewer publications may face funding and infrastructure constraints but still contribute to the diversity and collective understanding of MICP research.

The authors utilised the VOSviewer software to carry out a co-authorship analysis among countries, illustrating the patterns of international collaboration and knowledge sharing. In Figure 5, countries grouped from before and up to 2018 are shown in purple, those from 2018 to early 2019 are represented in turquoise, those spanning mid-2019 to 2021 appear in green and those from 2022 onwards are marked in yellow. This visual classification enables viewers to recognise connections of each country quickly, enhancing the geographical interpretation of the international co-authorship patterns observed with the VOSviewer software.

Figure 5

Overlay visualisation of bibliographic links between countries in the research field

Figure 5

Overlay visualisation of bibliographic links between countries in the research field

Close modal

Countries such as China, the USA, Singapore, Australia and Japan are leading contributors to MICP research, supported by strong academic infrastructures, substantial funding and expertise (Hasan et al., 2022). China and the USA have advanced MICP through international collaborations, while Singapore reflects significant technological innovation. Australia’s focus on environmental research enhances MICP applications in soil improvement and water management. Japan excels due to its advanced technology and strong institutions. Despite smaller contributions, countries such as Iran, Canada and the Netherlands have also made impactful advancements in MICP research (Omoregie et al., 2024).

Figure 6 shows the global distribution of research publications on MICP from the top ten countries. China leads with over 50 publications on ureolytic bacteria, followed by significant contributions in denitrifying and non-ureolytic pathways. The USA follows closely with over 40 publications on ureolytic bacteria and substantial research on the other pathways. India, Singapore, Japan, Australia, the UK, Malaysia, Nigeria and South Korea also show strong research activity, particularly in ureolytic MICP, with varied but notable contributions in denitrifying bacteria and non-ureolytic bacteria pathways. Overall, ureolytic bacteria dominate MICP research globally, reflecting their widespread application and effectiveness, while the denitrifying and non-ureolytic pathways also garner considerable interest, particularly in China and the USA.

Figure 6

MICP by different metabolic pathways by the top ten countries around the globe

Figure 6

MICP by different metabolic pathways by the top ten countries around the globe

Close modal

Table 2 and Figure 7 showcase important details about the authors who have significantly impacted the field of study, as revealed by the bibliometric data. Recognising these leading authors through bibliometric analysis is vital for grasping research trends and encouraging collaborations in the research area.

Figure 7

Co-citation analysis of cited authors; each cluster is represented by a different colour: red for cluster 1, green for cluster 2, blue for cluster 3 and yellow for cluster 4

Figure 7

Co-citation analysis of cited authors; each cluster is represented by a different colour: red for cluster 1, green for cluster 2, blue for cluster 3 and yellow for cluster 4

Close modal
Table 2

List of the top ten authors in the research area based on publication output

AuthorPublicationsCitationsReferences
Chu, Jian642828Chu et al. (2020) 
Xiao, Yang581956Xiao et al. (2023a) 
Kawasaki, Satoru541812Li et al. (2018a) 
Cheng, Liang491680Cheng and Shahin (2017a) 
Montoya, Brina Mortensen491308Montoya and Dejong (2013) 
Nakashima, Kazunori411148Chen et al. (2021b) 
Tang, Chao-Sheng35925Tang and Wang (2024) 
Achal, Varenyam342992Achal and Mukherjee (2015) 
Gomez, Michael G.292141Gomez et al. (2014) 
Dejong, Jason T.283679DeJong et al. (2013) 

Table 2 showcases the most prolific authors in the field, with Chu, Jian, from Nanyang Technological University at the forefront with 64 publications and 2828 citations, followed by Xiao, Yang, with 58 publications and 1956 citations. Other prominent contributors include Achal, Varenyam, from Guangdong Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, and Cheng, Liang, from Jiangsu University.

The co-citation analysis of authors, shown in Figure 7, underscores their scholarly influence and thematic interconnections. The network visualisation generated by the VOSviewer software displays the co-citation analysis of cited authors organised into four color-coded clusters. Red represents cluster 1, green cluster 2, blue cluster 3 and yellow Cluster 4, allowing for clear visual differentiation among the groups based on their co-citation relationships within the data set. This organisation facilitates the identification of groups of authors whose works are frequently cited together, offering valuable insights into the key figures and prevailing themes in MICP research.

Cluster 1, featuring authors such as Zhang, J., and Wang, Y., has high co-citation counts, highlighting their pivotal contributions to MICP in geotechnical engineering and environmental remediation. Cluster 2, with authors such as Chu, J.; DeJong, J. T.; Van Paassen, L. A.; and Soga, K., reflects significant collaborative work in MICP technology and biogeotechnical engineering. Cluster 3, including Verstraete, W.; Bang, S. S.; and Achal, V., focuses on microbiology, cementitious materials and sustainable construction. Cluster 4, with authors such as Gerlach, R., and Tobler, D. J., studies factors affecting MICP processes. These clusters demonstrate the extensive collaboration and knowledge exchange within the MICP research community, fostering innovative methodologies and interdisciplinary research.

Table 3 highlights the top Scopus-indexed journals in MICP research. Construction and Building Materials (Elsevier, UK) leads with 72 publications, 3465 citations and a CiteScore of 12.4 (Q1). Other notable journals include Marine and Petroleum Geology (Elsevier, the Netherlands), with 37 publications and a CiteScore of 9.3 (Q1), and Acta Geotechnica (Springer Nature), with 34 publications and a CiteScore of 8.7 (Q1). These journals, with high publication and citation numbers and Q1 rankings, underscore their influence in the field. Publishing in these journals boosts the visibility and impact of MICP research, covering areas such as construction materials, geotechnical engineering and environmental science.

Table 3

Top journals in the research field that are listed in the Scopus database

JournalPublicationsCitationsPublisher
Construction and Building Materials723465Elsevier
Marine and Petroleum Geology371528Elsevier
Acta Geotechnica34994Springer Nature
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering31749Elsevier
Journal of Hazardous Materials251251Elsevier
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering24901American Society of Civil Engineers
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering213179American Society of Civil Engineers
Journal of Environmental Management18419Elsevier
Chemosphere17391Elsevier
Geomicrobiology Journal151089Taylor & Francis Ltd

In the keyword co-occurrence analysis shown in Figure 8, the VOSviewer software explores how frequently the keywords selected by authors encapsulate the core themes of their research publications. The VOSviewer software detects patterns within the scholarly publication metadata, uncovering common themes and the relationships between various research topics based on how often they are mentioned by authors (Omoregie et al., 2019a, 2024). The analysis revealed that 484 keywords appeared at least five times across the literature. Among these, certain terms were particularly noteworthy due to their high occurrence rates. Notably, ‘calcite’ leads with 429 occurrences, followed by ‘soils’ with 297 occurrences, ‘calcite precipitation’ with 280 occurrences and ‘MICP’ with 201 occurrences, highlighting their significant prevalence and relevance within the research field.

Figure 8

Network visualisation of co-occurrence of author keywords in the research domain. The clusters in the figure and their respective colours include cluster 1 (red), cluster 2 (green), cluster 3 (blue), cluster 4 (yellow), cluster 5 (purple), cluster 6 (turquoise), cluster 7 (brown), cluster 8 (chocolate) and cluster 9 (Pink)

Figure 8

Network visualisation of co-occurrence of author keywords in the research domain. The clusters in the figure and their respective colours include cluster 1 (red), cluster 2 (green), cluster 3 (blue), cluster 4 (yellow), cluster 5 (purple), cluster 6 (turquoise), cluster 7 (brown), cluster 8 (chocolate) and cluster 9 (Pink)

Close modal

A significant keyword, ‘urea’, appears 153 times and stands out in this analysis. It has robust connections with other key terms such as ‘MICP’, ‘soils’, ‘bacteria’, ‘microbial activity’, ‘metabolism’ and ‘sustainable development’. This highlights an important direction for future research: exploring cleaner MICP processes that could potentially substitute urea usage to prevent ammonia production. This shift would align with UN Sustainable Development Goals by mitigating environmental impacts.

Figure 8 shows nine thematic clusters in MICP research. Cluster 1 (red) focuses on ‘metabolism’ and ‘Sporosarcina pasteurii’, crucial for urea hydrolysis and ammonia production (Abo-El-Enein et al., 2012; Amiri and Bundur, 2018). Cluster 2 (green) emphasises ‘sand’ and ‘stabilisation’, showcasing biocementation for enhancing the compressive strength of sand (Bernat-Maso et al., 2021; Xiao et al., 2023b). Cluster 3 (blue) highlights ‘bacteria’ and ‘calcite precipitation’ in environmental engineering and soil enhancement (Al Imran et al., 2019; Al-Salloum et al., 2017). Cluster 4 (yellow) investigates ‘soil improvement’ using urea for ureolytic bacteria (Bai et al., 2017; Omoregie et al., 2019b).

Cluster 5 (purple) delves into ‘soils’ and ‘biocementation’ for geotechnical engineering (Kwon et al., 2000). Cluster 6 (turquoise) centres on ‘biomineralisation’ and ‘solidification’ for dust and sand (Ramakrishnan et al., 2005). Cluster 7 (brown) highlights ‘permeability’, ‘stiffness’ and ‘compressive strength’ in geotechnical tests. Cluster 8 (chocolate) focuses on ‘cementation’, ‘microorganisms’ and ‘biostimulation’ for sustainable geotechnical methods (Aboujafar, 2009). Cluster 9 (pink) examines ‘saline soil’ stabilisation techniques (Montoya et al., 2012; Sarda et al., 2009).

From 2000 to 2007, foundational research on MICP using ureolytic bacteria primarily focused on understanding microbial processes and their potential applications. S. pasteurii, formerly known as Bacillus pasteurii, played a pivotal role in enhancing calcium carbonate precipitation. Minayeva and Hopwood (2002) demonstrated its effectiveness in environmental remediation, while Cho et al. (2003) extended this application to concrete repair, showing significant improvements in mortar strength. Ramakrishnan et al. (2005) highlighted the critical role of urease in calcite production, providing a biochemical understanding essential for future developments. These studies underscored the ability of ureolytic bacteria to precipitate calcium carbonate, filling soil pores, cementing particles together and improving soil and construction material properties.

During this same period, research on denitrifying bacteria such as Pseudomonas stutzeri focused on their potential in MICP. DeJong et al. (2006) and Revil (2007) explored the environmental implications of using these bacteria, showcasing their effectiveness in biogeotechnical engineering and environmental remediation. These studies laid the groundwork for understanding how denitrifying bacteria could facilitate calcite precipitation through nitrate reduction, enhancing soil stability and reducing contamination. Initial research on non-ureolytic bacteria in MICP aimed at exploring alternative pathways for calcium carbonate precipitation (Omoregie et al., 2016). These studies were foundational, identifying suitable bacteria and understanding their metabolic processes. Although detailed applications were not the primary focus, this research highlighted the potential of non-ureolytic bacteria to precipitate calcium carbonate without producing harmful by-products such as ammonia.

Between 2008 and 2014, researchers focused on practical applications and optimising the ureolytic pathway for MICP (Omoregie et al., 2017). DeJong et al. (2011) demonstrated significant improvements in soil shear behaviour and cementation through natural microbial processes. Van Der Star et al. (2010) developed techniques for consolidating porous limestone using ureolytic bacteria. Van Paassen et al. (2010b) explored biogrouting, enhancing soil strength and stiffness, showcasing the applicability of the method in geotechnical engineering. The optimisation of the ureolytic pathway during this period involved experimenting with different microbial strains, nutrients and conditions to maximise the efficiency and effectiveness of calcium carbonate precipitation (Gat et al., 2011; Jiang et al., 2016; Omoregie et al., 2016).

From 2008 to 2014, research expanded into practical applications of denitrifying bacteria in MICP. Van Paassen et al. (2010a) used P. stutzeri for biogrouting, improving ground properties by triggering calcium carbonate formation in soils (Omoregie et al., 2017). De Muynck et al. (2011) demonstrated the flexibility of this method in stone consolidation by adjusting chemical variables, highlighting the potential for effective and sustainable applications in soil stabilisation and environmental remediation. Non-ureolytic bacteria such as L. mesenteroides were tested for enhancing soil and building material properties (Gat et al., 2011; Xu et al., 2014). This period marked a transition from theoretical studies to practical applications, emphasising the environmental benefits and sustainability of non-ureolytic pathways, which do not produce ammonia as a by-product.

From 2015 to 2019, research addressed environmental concerns associated with the ureolytic MICP process, particularly ammonia production. Van Paassen et al. (2012) noted the high levels of ammonia produced, while Reeksting et al. (2020) highlighted the environmental risks, with laboratory concentrations exceeding safe thresholds. Despite these challenges, significant advancements were made in enhancing material properties, such as increased compressive strength of cement–sand mortar (Fauriel and Laloui, 2011) and applications such as reducing rock permeability for environmental remediation (Gomaa et al., 2006). Researchers continued to explore innovative methods to mitigate ammonia production while maintaining the effectiveness of MICP.

Between 2015 and 2019, studies highlighted the environmental benefits of using denitrifying bacteria in MICP. Cuthbert et al. (2012) and Omoregie et al. (2024) successfully applied this method to reduce rock permeability, demonstrating its potential for pollution mitigation. Researchers optimised conditions for effective calcium carbonate precipitation while minimising environmental impacts, exploring innovations such as co-culture techniques to reduce ammonia emissions (Cheng and Shahin, 2017a). Non-ureolytic MICP advanced in improving soil stability and reducing concrete cracks (Tan et al., 2023b). These studies underscored the sustainable nature of non-ureolytic pathways and their potential for broader use in geotechnical engineering and environmental remediation.

From 2020 to 2024, MICP research focused on sustainable practices. Gomez et al. (2018a) explored the enrichment of native ureolytic microorganisms for biocementation, offering potential cost and environmental benefits. Raveh-Amit and Tsesarsky (2020) and Raveh-Amit et al. (2024) used bio-stimulation to reduce soil erosion and cracks. Researchers also explored alternative nutrient sources such as industrial by-products to reduce ammonia emissions, aiming for more environmentally friendly MICP processes (Omoregie et al., 2023b; Pei et al., 2021). These efforts reflect a growing emphasis on sustainability in MICP research, addressing environmental concerns associated with traditional ureolytic pathways.

In recent years, research has aimed to enhance the sustainability of MICP using denitrifying bacteria. Raveh-Amit et al. (2024) used bio-stimulation to induce MICP in loess soil, reducing erosion. Liu et al. (2022) demonstrated the ability of MICP to improve clayey soil structure. Emerging studies are exploring alternative substrates to support bacterial activity without harmful by-products, enhancing the environmental applicability of MICP (Gowthaman et al., 2021). From 2020 to 2024, researchers focused on optimising non-ureolytic MICP for practical applications. Xu et al. (2014) and Gomez et al. (2018b) investigated using industrial by-products as nutrient sources for non-ureolytic bacteria, reducing environmental impact and costs. Studies have shown the effectiveness of these bacteria under various environmental conditions, enhancing construction materials and mitigating pollution without producing ammonia (Fahimizadeh et al., 2022; Hemayati et al., 2023; Justo-Reinoso et al., 2021; Pal et al., 2022). This period highlighted the integration of microbiology, environmental engineering and materials science to develop more sustainable and effective MICP technologies.

Table 4 shows that S. pasteurii is widely regarded as one of the most effective bacteria for MICP. Originating from soil in Germany, it is widely used in China for construction and soil stabilisation, excels in improving soil strength by 60% and is effective under saline conditions up to 10% sodium chloride (NaCl). It precipitates 14.8 g/l of calcium carbonate and produces 9.0 g/l of ammonia.

Table 4

Various bacteria used for MICP through the ureolytic pathway

Bacterial speciesCalcium carbonate precipitation: g/lCountry of originAmmonia production: g/lTime taken to precipitate: hSaline condition (sodium chloride (NaCl) %)Environmental requirementsWide range of applications
S. pasteurii14.8Germany924Yes (up to 10%)pH 7–9, 30–37°CImproves soil strength by 60%, used in concrete for crack healing (Bhaduri et al., 2016)
Bacillus megaterium12.5India8.236NopH 6–8, 25–35°CRemoves cadmium up to 90%, used in bioremediation of heavy metals (Bhaduri et al., 2016)
Bacillus sphaericus11.3Netherlands7.548Yes (up to 8%)pH 7–9, 30–37°CIncreases concrete compressive strength by 2 MPa (Velpuri et al., 2016)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa10.5USA7.230NopH 6–8, 25–35°CUsed in biocementation for soil stabilisation (Feng and Montoya, 2016)
Escherichia coli10Germany724NopH 6–8, 25–37°CEnhances soil shear strength, used in bio-concrete (Mortensen et al., 2011)
Bacillus subtilis9.8Japan6.836Yes (up to 5%)pH 7–9, 30–37°CUsed in agriculture for improving soil health (Silva et al., 2015)
Bacillus cereus9.5USA6.524NopH 6–8, 25–35°CImproves soil load-bearing capacity (Kim and Youn, 2016)
Proteus mirabilis9.2Germany6.230NopH 6–8, 25–37°CEnhances biocementation processes, useful in MICP (Mortensen et al., 2011)
Klebsiella pneumoniae8.8USA648Yes (up to 3%)pH 7–9, 30–37°CUsed in biocementation for soil improvement (Kirkland et al., 2017)
Helicobacter pylori8.5Japan5.836NopH 6–8, 25–37°CEnhances soil stabilisation processes (Sasaki and Kuwano, 2016)
Bacillus thuringiensis8.3India5.648Yes (up to 8%)pH 7–9, 30–37°CUsed in agriculture to improve crop yield (Wu et al., 2017)
Bacillus licheniformis8USA5.430NopH 6–8, 25–35°CUsed in detergents, enhances biocementation (Whitaker et al., 2018)
Bacillus pumilus7.8India5.224Yes (up to 4%)pH 7–9, 30–37°CUsed in soil improvement processes (Chittoori and Neupane, 2019)
Bacillus firmus7.5USA536NopH 6–8, 25–35°CEnhances soil stabilisation (Sarda et al., 2009)
Bacillus mycoides7.3USA4.848Yes (up to 6%)pH 7–9, 30–37°CUsed in microbial-induced calcium carbonate precipitation (Whitaker et al., 2018)
Micrococcus luteus7Netherlands4.530NopH 6–8, 25–35°CUsed in biocementation for enhancing soil properties (Silva et al., 2015)

In the USA, Bacillus megaterium excels in biocementation and bioremediation, removing 90% of cadmium and precipitating 12.5 g/l of calcium carbonate. Bacillus sphaericus strengthens concrete by 2 MPa in up to 8% sodium chloride. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli are used for soil stabilisation, precipitating 10.5 and 10.0 g/l of calcium carbonate, respectively. Bacillus subtilis and Proteus mirabilis are effective in biocementation, with Bacillus thuringiensis enhancing crop yield in up to 8% sodium chloride.

Table 5 shows that P. stutzeri, a denitrifying bacterium sourced from soil and water in Germany, can precipitate 10.2 g/l of calcium carbonate within 24 h. It is highly effective in removing up to 85% of nitrate and enhancing soil stability by 50%, making it valuable for environmental remediation and soil stabilisation. Bacillus licheniformis, originating from soil in the USA, precipitates 9.8 g/l of calcium carbonate over 36 h. This bacterium is widely used in agriculture for improving soil health due to its ability to enhance soil properties and nutrient availability.

Table 5

Various bacteria used for MICP through denitrification

Bacterial speciesCalcium carbonate precipitation: g/lSourceCountry of originTime taken to precipitate: hWide range of applications
P. stutzeri10.2Soil, waterGermany24Removes nitrate up to 85%, enhances soil stability by 50% (Yin et al., 2021)
Bacillus licheniformis9.8SoilUSA36Used in agriculture for improving soil health (Wang et al., 2022)
Paracoccus denitrificans9.5Soil, waterNetherlands48Reduces nitrate concentration by 80%, used in soil stabilisation (Guan et al., 2021)
Alcaligenes faecalis9.2Soil, waterUSA30Effective in waste water treatment, reduces nitrate by 75% (Wang et al., 2021)
P. aeruginosa9Soil, waterUSA36Enhances biocementation, removes nitrate up to 70% (O’Donnell et al., 2017b)
B. subtilis8.8SoilJapan48Used in agriculture to improve crop yield (O’Donnell et al., 2017b)
Pseudomonas putida8.5Soil, waterUSA24Reduces nitrate concentration by 65%, improves soil strength (O’Donnell et al., 2017b)
Acinetobacter sp.8.3Soil, waterNetherlands30Effective in waste water treatment, reduces nitrate by 60% (Huang et al., 2024)
Pseudomonas fluorescens8Soil, waterUSA36Enhances soil stabilisation, removes nitrate up to 55% (Sonmez and Erşan, 2022)
Bacillus cereus7.8SoilUSA24Improves soil load-bearing capacity (Jain et al., 2021)
Serratia marcescens7.5Soil, waterUSA30Enhances biocementation, reduces nitrate by 50% (Guo et al., 2023)
B. thuringiensis7.3SoilIndia48Used in agriculture for pest control and soil improvement (O’Donnell et al., 2017a)
Pseudomonas mendocina7Soil, waterUSA36Improves soil strength, reduces nitrate concentration by 45% (O’Donnell et al., 2017a)
Bacillus pumilus6.8SoilIndia24Enhances soil stabilisation processes (Ersan et al., 2015)
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens6.5SoilIndia36Improves soil fertility, used in biocementation (Ersan et al., 2015)
Bacillus firmus6.3SoilUSA48Enhances soil stability, used in microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation (Van Der Star et al., 2010)
B. megaterium6SoilIndia30Removes heavy metals, enhances soil strength (Zango et al., 2018)

Paracoccus denitrificans from the Netherlands precipitates 9.5 g/l of calcium carbonate in 48 h, reducing nitrate concentration by 80%, making it effective for soil stabilisation and nitrate pollution reduction. Alcaligenes faecalis from the USA precipitates 9.2 g/l of calcium carbonate in 30 h, reducing nitrate levels by 75%, and is highly effective in waste water treatment. P. aeruginosa from the USA precipitates 9 g/l of calcium carbonate in 36 h, enhancing biocementation and removing up to 70% of nitrate for various environmental applications. B. subtilis from Japan precipitates 8.8 g/l of calcium carbonate in 48 h and is used in agriculture to improve crop yield.

These bacteria exemplify the potential of denitrifying bacteria in MICP applications. They offer significant environmental benefits by reducing nitrate pollution and improving soil properties without producing harmful by-products such as ammonia. Their ability to utilise various sources, such as soil, water and industrial waste, further enhances their applicability in sustainable environmental management and agricultural practices.

S. ureae, a non-ureolytic bacterium sourced from soil in Germany, can precipitate 11.5 g/l of calcium carbonate within 24 h (Table 6). It effectively enhances soil stability by 55% and is particularly valuable for construction applications where rapid soil stabilisation is required. The ability to utilise organic compounds makes it an excellent candidate for projects that aim to recycle industrial waste such as brewery and winery by-products.

Table 6

Various bacteria used for MICP through the non-ureolytic pathway

Bacterial speciesCalcium carbonate precipitation: g/lSourceCountry of originTime taken to precipitate: hFood sourcesWide range of applications
S. ureae11.5SoilGermany24Nitrate, organic compoundsEnhances soil stability by 55%, used in construction (Gat et al., 2011)
B. pasteurii10.8SoilUSA36Organic matter, nitrateUsed in agriculture for improving soil health (Gat et al., 2011)
Paracoccus versutus10.2Soil, waterNetherlands48Nitrate, organic compoundsReduces nitrate concentration by 85%, used in soil stabilisation (Xu et al., 2014)
Lysinibacillus sphaericus9.9Soil, waterUSA30Nitrate, ammoniaEffective in waste water treatment, reduces nitrate by 80% (Lee et al., 2017)
Desulfovibrio vulgaris9.5Soil, waterUSA36Organic compounds, nitrateEnhances biocementation, removes nitrate up to 75% (Gat et al., 2014)
Rhodopseudomonas palustris9SoilJapan48Organic matter, nitrateUsed in agriculture to improve crop yield (Gat et al., 2014)
Bacillus cereus8.8SoilUSA24Organic matter, nitrateImproves soil load-bearing capacity (Lee et al., 2017)
Geobacter sulfurreducens8.5Soil, waterNetherlands30Nitrate, organic matterEffective in waste water treatment, reduces nitrate by 70% (Justo-Reinoso et al., 2023)
Shewanella oneidensis8Soil, waterUSA36Nitrate, organic compoundsEnhances soil stabilisation, removes nitrate up to 65% (Tsesarsky et al., 2018)
Clostridium bifermentans7.8SoilUSA24Organic matter, nitrateEnhances soil load-bearing capacity (Xu et al., 2014)
B. megaterium7.5SoilIndia48Organic matter, nitrateUsed in agriculture for soil improvement (Pal et al., 2022)
B. thuringiensis7.3SoilIndia36Organic matter, nitrateUsed in agriculture for pest control and soil improvement (Fahimizadeh et al., 2022)
Rhodococcus sp.7Soil, waterUSA36Nitrate, organic compoundsEnhances soil strength, reduces nitrate concentration by 60% (Tan et al., 2023a)
Bacillus pumilus6.8SoilIndia24Organic matter, nitrateEnhances soil stabilisation processes (Tan et al., 2023b)
Pseudomonas putida6.5Soil, waterUSA36Nitrate, organic compoundsReduces nitrate concentration by 55%, improves soil strength (Tan et al., 2023b)
Desulfotomaculum sp.6.3Soil, waterUSA48Nitrate, organic matterEffective in waste water treatment, reduces nitrate by 50% (Tan et al., 2023b)
Nitrosomonas europaea6SoilIndia30Organic matter, nitrateEnhances soil strength, used in microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation (Shaheen et al., 2021)

B. pasteurii, originating from soil in the USA, precipitates 10.8 g/l of calcium carbonate over 36 h. It is commonly used in agriculture to improve soil health and fertility, leveraging organic matter and nitrate from agricultural run-off. This bacterium’s ability to enhance soil properties without producing ammonia aligns well with sustainable agricultural practices. Paracoccus versutus, from soil and water in the Netherlands, precipitates 10.2 g/l of calcium carbonate in 48 h and reduces nitrate concentration by 85%. It is effective in soil stabilisation and environmental remediation, utilising organic compounds and nitrates, thus contributing to waste reduction and resource efficiency.

Lysinibacillus sphaericus, sourced from soil and water in the USA, precipitates 9.9 g/l of calcium carbonate in 30 h and is highly effective in waste water treatment, reducing nitrate levels by 80%. It is particularly useful in treating industrial effluents, making it a key player in sustainable waste management strategies. Desulfovibrio vulgaris, also from the USA, precipitates 9.5 g/l of calcium carbonate over 36 h. It is notable for its ability to enhance biocementation processes and remove up to 75% of nitrates, making it suitable for both environmental and construction applications.

These non-ureolytic bacteria offer significant environmental benefits by using organic compounds and industrial waste sugars for calcium carbonate precipitation without producing ammonia, making them eco-friendly. Their versatility in utilising various organic sources makes them suitable for agriculture, environmental remediation, construction and waste water treatment. This approach supports sustainability and promotes industrial waste recycling, aligning with circular economy principles.

The ureolytic pathway, exemplified by S. pasteurii, B. megaterium and B. sphaericus, is highly efficient in calcium carbonate precipitation, with S. pasteurii achieving up to 14.8 g/l (Gat et al., 2011; Kumari et al., 2014). This process involves the hydrolysis of urea by urease, leading to the production of ammonia and carbonate ions, which subsequently precipitate calcium carbonate (Cheng and Shahin, 2017b; Shougrakpam and Trivedi, 2018). While effective, this pathway generates substantial ammonia, exceeding 1000 parts per million (ppm) in lab settings, necessitating rigorous environmental controls in large-scale applications (Chen et al., 2016; Gat et al., 2011; Shougrakpam and Trivedi, 2018; Whiffin et al., 2007). Denitrifying bacteria, such as P. stutzeri, B. licheniformis and P. denitrificans, offer a cleaner MICP alternative through nitrate reduction, avoiding ammonia production (Pham et al., 2018).

P. stutzeri can precipitate 10.2 g/l of calcium carbonate and effectively remove up to 85% of nitrate, making it suitable for bioremediation and soil stabilisation (Kwon et al., 2024). This pathway, although generally yielding lower calcium carbonate precipitation rates than the ureolytic pathway, is particularly beneficial in applications where reduced environmental impact is crucial (O’Donnell et al., 2017b). Non-ureolytic bacteria, including S. ureae, B. pasteurii and P. versutus, utilise organic compounds and complex sugars for calcium carbonate precipitation without producing ammonia (Lee et al., 2017; Pal et al., 2022). S. ureae can precipitate 11.5 g/l of calcium carbonate, thriving on industrial waste such as spent grains and yeast. This makes these bacteria ideal for sustainable applications that focus on environmental sustainability and waste recycling, offering significant environmental and economic benefits, particularly for large-scale applications (Justo-Reinoso et al., 2023; Xu et al., 2014).

Ureolytic bacteria require urea and calcium sources, typically from calcium chloride, for the MICP process. The hydrolysis of urea generates ammonia, necessitating strict environmental controls to manage its release, as permissible ammonia levels are <5 ppm in labs and <50 ppm for large-scale applications, to protect aquatic life (Whiffin et al., 2007). These bacteria are highly effective but demand rigorous ammonia-management strategies (Sadjadi et al., 2014; Tsesarsky et al., 2018).

Denitrifying bacteria utilise nitrate as an electron acceptor and organic compounds or hydrogen as electron donors (Shahid, 2022; Zango et al., 2018). They require specific conditions, such as low-oxygen environments, to reduce nitrate to nitrogen gas and precipitate calcium carbonate effectively. This pathway is cleaner, as it does not produce ammonia, making it suitable for applications where environmental impact needs to be minimised (Jin et al., 2022). Non-ureolytic bacteria thrive on organic compounds and complex sugars, often sourced from industrial waste such as brewery and winery by-products. These bacteria do not produce ammonia, making them environmentally friendly. They can utilise various organic wastes, reducing the ecological footprint and adding value to what would otherwise be waste materials (Chaurasia et al., 2019). This pathway aligns well with sustainability goals and supports large-scale applications focused on environmental sustainability (Hemayati et al., 2023; Pal et al., 2022; Tan et al., 2023b).

S. pasteurii in the ureolytic pathway can precipitate up to 14.8 g/l of calcium carbonate within 24 h, significantly enhancing soil strength but producing high levels of ammonia. Applications include construction and soil stabilisation, where rapid and substantial calcium carbonate precipitation is essential. However, the high ammonia production necessitates remediation strategies (Wang et al., 2021). P. stutzeri in the denitrifying pathway precipitates 10.2 g/l of calcium carbonate in 24 h and is effective in nitrate removal, making it suitable for bioremediation and soil stabilisation. Although it generally produces lower amounts of calcium carbonate compared with ureolytic bacteria, its lack of ammonia production makes it ideal for environmentally sensitive projects (Min et al., 2024; Sonmez and Erşan, 2022; Tan et al., 2023b). Non-ureolytic bacteria such as S. ureae precipitate 11.5 g/l of calcium carbonate within 24 h and thrive on industrial waste, making them suitable for sustainable applications such as environmental remediation and waste recycling (Barkouki et al., 2011; Li et al., 2018b). Their ability to utilise organic waste without producing harmful by-products highlights their potential for large-scale, environmentally friendly applications (Almajed et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2019).

In summary, the choice of MICP pathway depends on specific application requirements and environmental considerations. Ureolytic bacteria offer high efficiency but require stringent ammonia management. Denitrifying bacteria provide a cleaner alternative, effective in nitrate-rich environments but requiring specific conditions. Non-ureolytic bacteria stand out for their sustainability and versatility, utilising industrial waste without producing harmful by-products, making them ideal for large-scale, environmentally friendly applications. Bacteria such as B. megaterium and B. licheniformis are versatile across multiple pathways, adapting to various applications based on environmental and economic considerations (Gat et al., 2011; Justo-Reinoso et al., 2021; Tan et al., 2023b; Xu et al., 2014).

Recent research trends in MICP highlight the exploration of alternative pathways, indicating a need for further investigation into their environmental impacts to optimise MICP performance. MICP has garnered attention across various applications for its alignment with UN Sustainable Development Goals, aiming to foster safe, efficient and environmentally friendly technologies (Zhang et al., 2023). Assessing the environmental friendliness of MICP can be achieved through life-cycle assessment (LCA), a systematic approach commonly used to evaluate the environmental impacts and resource utilisation of a product throughout its life cycle. The MICP life cycle encompasses raw material extraction, production, application and final disposal phases. While biocementation is known for its sustainability and eco-friendliness, the slow pace of its natural cementation process and its reliance on limited resources hinder its industrial feasibility. Researchers are thus focusing on engineered biocementation to meet industrial standards, although this often involves costly, energy-intensive materials, necessitating a comprehensive assessment of their true environmental impacts, particularly in large-scale applications.

The typical engineered biocementation and cement production processes are shown in Figure 9. Porter et al. (2021) identified urea and calcium chloride production as the main contributors to embodied energy in biocementation, as opposed to cement manufacturing, where energy consumption primarily occurs during limestone combustion, preheating and clinker production. Specifically, urea consumes 30.54 MJ/kg and calcium chloride 11.76 MJ/kg in biocementation and 6.21 MJ/kg in ordinary Portland cement manufacturing (Porter et al., 2021). These findings emphasise the importance of evaluating the efficiency and sustainability of engineered biocementation for industrial applications.

Figure 9

Comparison of the process with primary contributors to embodied energy (orange box): (a) engineered biocementation; (b) cement production

Figure 9

Comparison of the process with primary contributors to embodied energy (orange box): (a) engineered biocementation; (b) cement production

Close modal

Porter et al. (2021) conducted a comparative life-cycle analysis to assess the environmental and economic impacts of different biocementation methods (see Tables 7 and 8). They focused on calcium carbonate produced through various MICP pathways using laboratory-grade chemicals against manufactured calcium carbonate, using 1 kg of calcium carbonate as the functional unit (Porter et al., 2021). For carbon dioxide emissions (‘carbon emissions’), MICP with ureolytic bacteria produced 2.06 carbon dioxide/kg calcium carbonate, while the conventional process emitted 2.37 carbon dioxide/kg calcium carbonate, making MICP 13.08% lower in emissions. However, MICP consumed more energy (28.4 MJ/kg calcium carbonate) compared with the conventional process (7.2 MJ/kg calcium carbonate), which is 55.28% higher due to the use of laboratory-grade chemicals. When using commercial-grade chemicals, it was found that the carbon emissions of MICP decreased to 1.51 carbon dioxide/kg calcium carbonate and energy consumption decreased to 16.1 MJ/kg calcium carbonate, reducing emissions and energy use by 26.70 and 43.31%, respectively. This improvement is attributed to the lower energy requirements of commercially sourced calcium chloride, obtained through hypochlorination of allyl chloride, which has a low concentration. In terms of cost, the expenses associated with using laboratory-grade chemicals generally exceed those for producing manufactured calcium carbonate. Calcium chloride, in particular, is a major cost driver, followed by urea. Table 8 summarises these cost implications, revealing that carbonates produced through MICP using laboratory-grade chemicals are significantly more expensive compared with manufactured calcium carbonate.

Table 7

Environmental performance of MICP through ureolytic bacteria, using laboratory-grade and commercial-grade chemicals, against the manufactured calcium carbonate (Porter et al., 2021)

Carbonation processCarbon dioxide emission: carbon dioxide/kg calcium carbonateEnergy consumption: MJ/kg calcium carbonate
Manufactured calcium carbonate2.377.2
MICP through ureolytic bacteria (using laboratory-grade chemicals)2.0628.4
MICP through ureolytic bacteria (using commercial-grade chemicals)1.5116.1
Table 8

Cost implications of MICP through ureolytic bacteria, using laboratory-grade and commercial-grade chemicals, against the manufactured calcium carbonate (Porter et al., 2021)

Grade of chemical usedCost of the carbonation process: AU$/kg calcium carbonate
Manufactured calcium carbonateMICP through ureolytic bacteria
Laboratory grade61107
Commercial grade0.43.1

AU$1 = US$0.655

The study by Porter et al. (2021) shows that using carbon sources for producing carbonates through MICP results in a higher environmental impact compared with traditional methods such as manufactured calcium carbonate. To make MICP more viable and sustainable, previous studies suggest alternatives to mitigate environmental impacts. Researchers have explored other calcium sources, such as calcium acetate and calcium nitrate (Abo-El-Enein et al., 2012), dissolved limestone in lactic acid (Phua and Røyne, 2018) and eggshells (Choi et al., 2016), to enhance the sustainability of MICP by improving physical and chemical properties and utilising low-cost, sustainable raw materials.

Field-scale biocementation is costly, necessitating significant cost reductions if large-scale applications are desired. Researchers often use commercially available reagents, with analytical-grade growing media being a major financial burden. About 60% of MICP process costs are due to nutrients for ureolytic bacterial culture, a figure expected to rise with increased research interest (Yoosathaporn et al., 2016). Recently, researchers have explored replacing expensive laboratory-grade materials with more practical alternatives for MICP. Omoregie et al. (2019a) assessed cost-effective technical-grade reagents for large-scale MICP, comparing the performance of S. pasteurii with technical-grade reagents against that with analytical-grade reagents for sand biocementation (Omoregie et al., 2019a). Technical-grade cementation solutions showed results in surface strength (1448 ± 69 to 4826 kPa) and calcium carbonate content (5.56 ± 1.15 to 33.24 ± 0.59%) comparable with those treated with analytical-grade solutions but were significantly cheaper (US$0.07–0.26/l against US$3.33–13.29/l).

In addition to the study by Porter et al. (2021), Deng et al. (2021) conducted a comprehensive LCA of MICP through urea hydrolysis, evaluating energy consumption and carbon emissions from a resource utilisation perspective. The LCA considered the impacts of raw material consumption, material processing, carbon emissions, energy consumption, and product and by-product in every process. Their analysis revealed that the reaction between 1 mol of urea and 1 mol of calcium ions produced 1 mol of calcium carbonate. The primary raw materials for MICP were bacterial solution and nutrient salts (i.e. urea and calcium chloride) in a 1:10 ratio for the reaction process. For the theoretical experiment, S. pasteurii bacteria were used. To produce 1 t of calcium carbonate, 0.64 t of urea and 1.08 t of calcium chloride were required, forming the basis for the comparison of environmental impacts. The consumption of raw materials for the theoretical experiment of MICP is summarised in Table 9.

Table 9

Optimal ratio of raw materials needed to produce 1 t of calcium carbonate (Deng et al., 2021)

Raw materialAmmoniaCarbon dioxideCalcium carbonateHydrochloric acid (HCl)Water (H2O)Yeast extractAmmonium chloride (NH4Cl)Nickel (II) chloride (NiCl2)
Material consumption: kg/t400440100072040020100.00124

Deng et al. (2021) found that the carbon emissions from the bacterial solution process mainly resulted from bacterial respiration during growth and were relatively minimal. The energy consumption in this process came from the equipment used for bacterial cultivation. For nutrient salts such as urea and calcium chloride, their production involved significant energy consumption from coal and electricity. The MICP process itself was driven by bacterial activity and required no additional energy, consuming only the bacterial solution, urea and calcium chloride. Producing 1 t of calcium carbonate through MICP through urea hydrolysis resulted in 3399.5 kg of carbon emissions and consumed an energy equivalent of 1847.3 kg of coal. The carbon emissions and energy consumption were attributed to the production of raw materials rather than the MICP reaction. Specifically, 72.4% of carbon emissions came from calcium chloride, 8.0% from urea and 19.6% from producing the bacterial solution (see Figure 10). In the study, energy consumption was predominantly from raw materials (96%), with 80.2% of the energy coming from coal and 19.8% from electricity (see Figure 11). The bacterial solution production accounted for only 4% of the energy consumption. Most electricity consumption (79.8%) was attributed to the production of calcium chloride and urea, with the remainder from the bacterial solution process, while coal consumption was entirely from raw materials. Thus, raw materials were identified as the main contributors to the environmental impacts of MICP.

Figure 10

Carbon emissions of MICP raw materials and process (adapted from Deng et al. (2021))

Figure 10

Carbon emissions of MICP raw materials and process (adapted from Deng et al. (2021))

Close modal
Figure 11

Energy consumption of MICP raw materials and process (adapted from Deng et al. (2021))

Figure 11

Energy consumption of MICP raw materials and process (adapted from Deng et al. (2021))

Close modal

While MICP shows promise for soil improvement and material strengthening, its current environmental impacts, particularly regarding energy consumption and carbon emissions, remain a challenge that necessitates further research. The use of raw materials and generation of ammonium waste in MICP requires careful consideration of environmental implications. To make MICP a sustainable construction technology, reusing by-products or naturally existing materials is a viable alternative. Using recycled waste materials as nutrients for microorganisms and cementation reagents, rather than commercial reagents, could enhance the sustainability of biocementation practices. The ongoing use of urea and calcium chloride impacts the viability of MICP as a sustainable method. Considerations of alternative materials for urea, urease enzymes and calcium sources is crucial to optimise fully the environmental potential of MICP (Faruqi et al., 2023). These include industrial by-products and waste materials such as fly ash and recycled aggregates (Chahal et al., 2012; Zhao et al., 2022), activated sludge (Yang et al., 2020), kitchen waste (Meng et al., 2021) and pig urine (Chen et al., 2019).

In recent years, artificial intelligence and/or machine learning techniques have gained popularity in geotechnical engineering due to their capabilities in developing robust predictive models to process complex data sets that can enhance existing engineering design processes (Jong et al., 2021). This presents an opportunity for future research on MICP by harnessing the capabilities of machine learning to optimise the MICP process, as well as its performance. Among various techniques available, Bayesian inference has been widely employed for the study of geomaterial characterisation (Hu et al., 2021; Jin et al., 2019; Jong et al., 2022; Yang et al., 2019). This is because it treats design parameters as random variables and computes their probability distributions, rather than providing deterministic solutions, which treat parameters as constants and may not reflect their true values (Ching and Phoon, 2018; Qi and Zhou, 2017). Additionally, this probabilistic approach allows for a reasonable quantification of model prediction uncertainty, enabling users to capture confidence levels associated with the model output and aiding in decision making for future studies. This optimisation concept is definitely applicable to the MICP process.

Since the MICP process involves various raw materials that would impact its strength development and thus its effectiveness, the Bayesian method might be a feasible approach for material characterisation in MICP applications. In a similar context, for example, Jong et al. (2022) employed a variant of the Bayesian method, known as Bayesian regression, to investigate the optimum strength gain in sustainable geomaterials such as fly-ash-based geopolymer concrete and sustainable cementitious blends for soft soil stabilisation (Jong et al., 2022). The selection process enabled the influence of different factors to be ranked based on their significance on the model output (i.e. strength), aiding in the decision making to prioritise important factors for future studies. On the other hand, another variant of the Bayesian method, the Bayesian network, could be potentially applied to study the soil–structure interactions of MICP-treated ground in soil stabilisation (Jong et al., 2022) For example, a Bayesian network that incorporates the Bayesian updating process could be used to study ground deformations induced by dynamic loads (i.e. traffic loads) to assess the performance of a subgrade treated using the MICP technique in pavement applications.

Despite claims of MICP being a sustainable, low-energy and low carbon dioxide method since it does not directly produce greenhouse gas emissions and it can absorb carbon dioxide from the environment, producing the necessary raw materials for MICP involves significant energy use and carbon emissions. Some research suggests that the carbon dioxide footprint of MICP is higher than that of ordinary Portland cement due to the embodied energy in urea and calcium chloride, which are derived from natural gas and coal emissions (Deng et al., 2021). The energy consumption for urea is 30.54 MJ/kg, and for calcium chloride, it is 11.76 MJ/kg, whereas ordinary Portland cement manufacturing consumes 6.21 MJ/kg (Porter et al., 2021). Therefore, using calcium-rich resources and urea alternatives could reduce environmental costs and improve MICP sustainability. Although studies on various MICP alternatives have been conducted, the overall sustainability of these alternatives is uncertain due to a lack of comprehensive data on resource requirements, thus presenting opportunities for more research. Future experiments could include a thorough life-cycle analysis to assess the environmental impacts of alternative calcium sources for MICP.

The comprehensive analysis of publication and citation trends, global participation, leading authors, preferred journals and keyword co-occurrence in MICP research provides substantial insights into the evolution of the field, particularly regarding the use of raw materials from industry sources and the impact that ammonia production has on the environment. Since 2018, there has been a notable increase in both publications and citations, illustrating growing interest and recognition of the potential of MICP in addressing modern environmental and civil engineering challenges. This trend underscores the dynamic nature of MICP research and its rising prominence within the academic community. The global distribution of contributions, with active participation from 59 countries, including China, the USA and European nations such as the UK, Germany and the Netherlands, reflects worldwide relevance and collaborative essence in MICP research.

Keyword co-occurrence analysis further highlights thematic clusters and key research areas, identifying vital topics such as permeability, bacterial activity, calcite precipitation and ground improvement. These analyses provide valuable insights into the current research landscape and point towards emerging trends within the field. The identification of top prolific authors and preferred journals emphasises the collaborative and interdisciplinary nature of MICP research, facilitating global collaboration and knowledge exchange. Collectively, these findings not only offer a comprehensive understanding of the progression of MICP research but also guide future research directions, interdisciplinary collaborations and strategic planning essential for advancing MICP applications to tackle environmental challenges and enhance civil engineering practices effectively.

Based on the insights gathered from this bibliometric review and the evolution of research, several avenues for future research are suggested. There is potential to investigate alternatives to industrial urea for feeding ureolytic bacteria in MICP processes through holistic life-cycle analysis and optimising cultural conditions through machine learning. Options such as complex carbohydrates and sugars derived from brewery and winery waste, or other dairy and sugar mill by-products, could serve as eco-friendly substitutes that minimise the production of ammonia, a problematic by-product in traditional MICP methods. Additionally, research could venture into utilising bacterial strains other than ureolytic bacteria, such as a concoction of multiple types of denitrifying and non-ureolytic Bacillus species, which might enable cleaner MICP processes suitable for large-scale applications without environmental detriment. Further research should also focus on enhancing the efficiency of non-ureolytic bacteria, particularly in terms of the rate of precipitation, as well as the homogeneity and distribution of the precipitated crystals. In the context of applying MICP to marine and saline environments – such as for sand stabilisation, coastal erosion control and protection of marine structures – investigating halotolerant microbial strains such as Halomonas eurihalina is crucial to maintain the effectiveness of MICP under saline conditions. Continuous monitoring and analysis of the latest trends in MICP research will be crucial for maintaining a leading edge in innovation and making significant contributions to overcoming environmental challenges and advancing civil engineering methodologies.

Abo-El-Enein
SA
,
Ali
AH
,
Talkhan
FN
,
Abdel-Gawwad
HA
2012
Utilization of microbial induced calcite precipitation for sand consolidation and mortar crack remediation
HBRC Journal
8
185
-
192
Aboujafar
SM
2009
The use of high pressure MICP data in reservoir characterization, developing a new model for Libyan reservoirs
Proceedings of the SPE/EAGE Reservoir Characterization and Simulation Conference 2009: Overcoming Modeling Challenges to Optimize Recovery
Abu Dhabi, UAE
183
-
202
Achal
V
,
Mukherjee
A
2015
A review of microbial precipitation for sustainable construction
Construction and Building Materials
93
1224
-
1235
Achal
V
,
Pan
X
,
Zhang
D
2011
Remediation of copper-contaminated soil by Kocuria flava CR1, based on microbially induced calcite precipitation
Ecological Engineering
37
1601
-
1605
Al Imran
M
,
Kimura
S
,
Nakashima
K
,
Evelpidou
N
,
Kawasaki
S
2019
Feasibility study of native ureolytic bacteria for biocementation towards coastal erosion protection by MICP method
Applied Sciences
9
20
4462
Al Qabany
A
,
Soga
K
2013a
Effect of chemical treatment used in MICP on engineering properties of cemented soils
Bio- and Chemo-mechanical Processes in Geotechnical Engineering – Géotechnique Symposium
Laloui
L
ICE Publishing
London, UK
107
-
115
Al Qabany
A
,
Soga
K
2013b
Effect of chemical treatment used in MICP on engineering properties of cemented soils
Géotechnique
63
331
-
339
Al Qabany
A
,
Soga
K
,
Santamarina
C
2012
Factors affecting efficiency of microbially induced calcite precipitation
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
138
992
-
1001
Al-Salloum
Y
,
Hadi
S
,
Abbas
H
,
Almusallam
T
,
Moslem
MA
2017
Bio-induction and bioremediation of cementitious composites using microbial mineral precipitation – a review
Construction and Building Materials
154
857
-
876
Alhassan
M
,
Jalil
AA
,
Omoregie
AI
, et al
2024
Silica-based materials in methane conversion: a two-decade bibliometric and literature review (1995–2022)
Topics in Catalysis
Almajed
A
,
Lateef
MA
,
Moghal
AAB
,
Lemboye
K
2021
State-of-the-art review of the applicability and challenges of microbial-induced calcite precipitation (MICP) and enzyme-induced calcite precipitation (EICP) techniques for geotechnical and geoenvironmental applications
Crystals
11
4
370
Amiri
A
,
Bundur
ZB
2018
Use of corn-steep liquor as an alternative carbon source for biomineralization in cement-based materials and its impact on performance
Construction and Building Materials
165
655
-
662
Anbu
P
,
Kang
CH
,
Shin
YJ
,
So
JS
2016
Formations of calcium carbonate minerals by bacteria and its multiple applications
SpringerPlus
5
1
article 250
Bagga
M
,
Hamley-Bennett
C
,
Alex
A
, et al
2022
Advancements in bacteria based self-healing concrete and the promise of modelling
Construction and Building Materials
358
3
129412
Bahmani
M
,
Fatehi
H
,
Noorzad
A
,
Hamedi
J
2019
Biological soil improvement using new environmental bacteria isolated from northern Iran
Environmental Geotechnics
9
534
-
546
Bai
Y
,
Guo
XJ
,
Li
YZ
,
Huang
T
2017
Experimental and visual research on the microbial induced carbonate precipitation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa
AMB Express
7
1
57
Bao
R
,
Li
J
,
Li
L
, et al
2017
Effect of microbial-induced calcite precipitation on surface erosion and scour of granular soils: proof of concept
Transportation Research Record
2657
10
-
18
Barkouki
TH
,
Martinez
BC
,
Mortensen
BM
, et al
2011
Forward and inverse bio-geochemical modeling of microbially induced calcite precipitation in half-meter column experiments
Transport in Porous Media
90
23
-
39
Basri
HF
,
Omoregie
AI
,
Mokhter
MA
2023
Influence of enriched urease producing bacteria from leachate and restaurant wastewater on heavy metal removal
Malaysian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences
19
956
-
969
Behzadipour
H
,
Ghezelbash
GR
,
Pakbaz
MS
2020
Effects of biocementation on strength parameters of silty and clayey sands
Bioinspired, Biomimetic and Nanobiomaterials
9
1
24
-
32
Bernat-Maso
E
,
Gil
L
,
Lis
MJ
,
Teneva
E
2021
Soil biostabilisation and interaction with compaction processes for earthen engineering structures production
Materiales de Construcción
71
Bhaduri
S
,
Debnath
N
,
Mitra
S
,
Liu
Y
,
Kumar
A
2016
Microbiologically induced calcite precipitation mediated by Sporosarcina pasteurii
Journal of Visualized Experiments
2016
110
article 53253
Carter
MS
,
Tuttle
MJ
,
Mancini
JA
, et al
2023
Microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation by Sporosarcina pasteurii: a case study in optimizing biological CaCO3 precipitation
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
89
Chahal
N
,
Siddique
R
,
Rajor
A
2012
Influence of bacteria on the compressive strength, water absorption and rapid chloride permeability of fly ash concrete
Construction and Building Materials
28
351
-
356
Chaurasia
L
,
Bisht
V
,
Singh
LP
,
Gupta
S
2019
A novel approach of biomineralization for improving micro and macro-properties of concrete
Construction and Building Materials
195
340
-
351
Chen
F
,
Deng
C
,
Song
W
, et al
2016
Biostabilization of desert sands using bacterially induced calcite precipitation
Geomicrobiology Journal
33
243
-
249
Chen
HJ
,
Huang
YH
,
Chen
CC
,
Maity
JP
,
Chen
CY
2019
Microbial induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP) using pig urine as an alternative to industrial urea
Waste and Biomass Valorization
10
2887
-
2895
Chen
L
,
Song
Y
,
Huang
J
, et al
2021a
Critical review of solidification of sandy soil by microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP)
Crystals
11
12
1439
Chen
M
,
Gowthaman
S
,
Nakashima
K
,
Komatsu
S
,
Kawasaki
S
2021b
Used paper fibers for sustainably enhancing the MICP stabilization of sand
Advances in Urban Geotechnical Engineering
Kim
SS
,
Moghal
AAB
,
Yao
J
Springer
Cham, Switzerland
52
-
64
Cheng
L
,
Shahin
MA
2017a
Bacteria induced cementation for soil stabilization
Proceedings of ICSMGE 2017 – 19th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Seoul, South Korea
2489
-
2492
Cheng
L
,
Shahin
MA
2017b
Stabilisation of oil-contaminated soils using microbially induced calcite crystals by bacterial flocs
Géotechnique Letters
7
2
146
-
151
Cheng
L
,
Cord-Ruwisch
R
,
Shahin
MA
2013
Cementation of sand soil by microbially induced calcite precipitation at various degrees of saturation
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
50
81
-
90
Ching
J
,
Phoon
KK
2018
Constructing site-specific multivariate probability distribution model using Bayesian machine learning
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
145
1
04018126
Chittoori
B
,
Neupane
S
2019
Evaluating the application of microbial induced calcite precipitation technique to stabilize expansive soils
Tunneling in Soft Ground, Ground Conditioning and Modification Techniques
Cheng
W
,
Yang
J
,
Wang
J
Springer
Cham, Switzerland
10
-
19
Cho
BU
,
Park
SE
,
Lee
JK
,
Lee
YJ
,
Yeom
GY
2003
The characteristics of magnetically enhanced large area processing plasmas
The 30th International Conference on Plasma Science, 2003. ICOPS 2003. IEEE Conference Record – Abstracts
IEEE
New York, NY, USA
161
Choi
SG
,
Wu
S
,
Chu
J
2016
Biocementation for sand using an eggshell as calcium source
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
142
06016010
Choi
SG
,
Chang
I
,
Lee
M
, et al
2020
Review on geotechnical engineering properties of sands treated by microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP) and biopolymers
Construction and Building Materials
246
6
118415
Chu
J
,
Cheng
L
,
Tun
K
2020
Microbially included calcite coating layer on concrete surface as inhabitance of coral to produce artificial coral reef
Proceedings of the 16th Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (ARC 2019)
Taipei, Taiwan
paper no. SEAGS-007
Cuthbert
MO
,
Riley
MS
,
Handley-Sidhu
S
, et al
2012
Controls on the rate of ureolysis and the morphology of carbonate precipitated by S. pasteurii biofilms and limits due to bacterial encapsulation
Ecological Engineering
41
32
-
40
Dawoud
O
,
Chen
CY
,
Soga
K
2014
Microbial induced calcite precipitation for geotechnical and environmental applications
New Frontiers in Geotechnical Engineering
Zhang
G
,
Liu
Z
American Society of Civil Engineers
Reston, VA, USA
11
-
18
De Muynck
W
,
De Belie
N
,
Verstraete
W
2010
Microbial carbonate precipitation in construction materials: a review
Ecological Engineering
36
2
118
-
136
De Muynck
W
,
Leuridan
S
,
Van Loo
D
, et al
2011
Influence of pore structure on the effectiveness of a biogenic carbonate surface treatment for limestone conservation
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
77
19
6808
-
6820
de Souza Oliveira Filho
J
,
Pereira
MG
2021
Global soil science research on drylands: an analysis of research evolution, collaboration, and trends
Journal of Soils and Sediments
21
12
3856
-
3867
DeJong
JT
,
Fritzges
MB
,
Nüsslein
K
2006
Microbially induced cementation to control sand response to undrained shear
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
132
1381
-
1392
DeJong
JT
,
Soga
K
,
Banwart
SA
, et al
2011
Soil engineering in vivo: harnessing natural biogeochemical systems for sustainable, multi-functional engineering solutions
Journal of the Royal Society Interface
8
1
-
15
DeJong
JD
,
Martinez
BC
,
Ginn
TR
,
Nelson
DC
2013
Bio-geo-chemical processes for improvement of soil engineering properties with focus on microbially induced calcite precipitation
In Coupled Phenomena in Environmental Geotechnics: From Theoretical and Experimental Research to Practical Applications
Manassero
M
,
Dominijanni
A
,
Foti
S
,
Musso
G
CRC Press
Boca Raton, FL, USA
103
-
117
Deng
X
,
Li
Y
,
Liu
H
, et al
2021
Examining energy consumption and carbon emissions of microbial induced carbonate precipitation using the life cycle assessment method
Sustainability
13
9
4856
Ersan
,
Gruyaert
E
,
Louis
G
, et al
2015
Self-protected nitrate reducing culture for intrinsic repair of concrete cracks
Frontiers in Microbiology
6
Fahimizadeh
M
,
Pasbakhsh
P
,
Mae
LS
,
Tan
JBL
,
Raman
RKS
2022
Multifunctional, sustainable, and biological non-ureolytic self-healing systems for cement-based materials
Engineering
13
217
-
237
Faruqi
A
,
Hall
CA
,
Kendall
A
2023
Sustainability of bio-mediated and bio-inspired ground improvement techniques for geologic hazard mitigation: a systematic literature review
Frontiers in Earth Science
11
Fauriel
S
,
Laloui
L
2011
A bio-hydro-mechanical model for propagation of biogrout in soils
In Geo-Frontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering
Han
K
,
Alzamora
DE
American Society of Civil Engineers
Reston, VA, USA
4041
-
4048
Fauriel
S
,
Laloui
L
2012
A bio-chemo-hydro-mechanical model for microbially induced calcite precipitation in soils
Computers and Geotechnics
46
104
-
120
Feng
K
,
Montoya
BM
2016
Influence of confinement and cementation level on the behavior of microbial-induced calcite precipitated sands under monotonic drained loading
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
142
1
04015057
Ganendra
G
,
Wang
J
,
Ramos
JA
, et al
2015
Biogenic concrete protection driven by the formate oxidation by Methylocystis parvus OBBP
Frontiers in Microbiology
6
Gat
D
,
Tsesarsky
M
,
Shamir
D
2011
Ureolytic calcium carbonate precipitation in the presence of non-ureolytic competing bacteria
In Geo-Frontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering
Han
K
,
Alzamora
DE
American Society of Civil Engineers
Reston, VA, USA
3966
-
3974
Gat
D
,
Tsesarsky
M
,
Shamir
D
,
Ronen
Z
2014
Accelerated microbial-induced CaCO3 precipitation in a defined coculture of ureolytic and non-ureolytic bacteria
Biogeosciences
11
2561
-
2569
Gomaa
N
,
Al-Alyak
A
,
Ouzzane
D
, et al
2006
Case study of permeability, VUG quantification, and rock typing in a complex carbonate
Proceedings of the 2006 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
San Antonio, TX, USA
3312
-
3321
Gomez
MG
,
Anderson
CM
,
Dejong
JT
,
Nelson
DC
,
Lau
XH
2014
Stimulating in situ soil bacteria for bio-cementation of sands
Geo-Congress 2014 Technical Papers: Geo-Characterization and Modeling for Sustainability
Abu-Farsakh
M
,
Yu
X
,
Hoyos
LR
American Society of Civil Engineers
Reston, VA, USA
1674
-
1682
Gomez
MG
,
Dejong
JT
,
Anderson
CM
2018a
Effect of bio-cementation on geophysical and cone penetration measurements in sands
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
55
1632
-
1646
Gomez
MG
,
Graddy
CMR
,
Dejong
JT
,
Nelson
DC
,
Tsesarsky
M
2018b
Stimulation of native microorganisms for biocementation in samples recovered from field scale treatment depths
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
144
1
04017098
Gowthaman
S
,
Nakashima
K
,
Nakamura
H
,
Kawasaki
S
2021
Experimental study on strengthening near-surface of slopes using bio-grouting technique
In Advances in Sustainable Construction and Resource Management
Hazarika
H
,
Madabhushi
GS
,
Yasuhara
K
,
Bergado
DT
Springer
Singapore
771
-
786
Guan
L
,
Zhang
W
,
Zhang
P
, et al
2021
Comparisons of evaluating fractured tight sandstone reservoirs pore structures based on borehole electrical image and nuclear magnetic resonance NMR logs
Proceedings of the 2021 SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference
paper no. SPE-204875-M
Guo
B
,
Liu
B
,
Chen
J
, et al
2023
Prospect research on the diversity of extracellular mineralization process induced by mineralizing microorganisms and its use as a treatment for soil pollutants
Sustainability
15
6
4858
Harkes
MP
,
Van Paassen
LA
,
Booster
JL
,
Whiffin
VS
,
Van Loosdrecht
MCM
2010
Fixation and distribution of bacterial activity in sand to induce carbonate precipitation for ground reinforcement
Ecological Engineering
36
2
112
-
117
Hasan
HA
,
Lafta
SH
,
Majeed
MW
,
Khabbaz
H
,
Aghayarzadeh
M
2022
Numerical simulation of pervious concrete pile in loose and silty sand after treating with microbially induced calcite precipitation
International Journal of GEOMATE
22
32
-
39
Hasan
MA MZ
,
Bin Amin
M
,
Nekmahmud
M
,
Oláh
J
2023
Sustainable biofuel economy: a mapping through bibliometric research
Journal of Environmental Management
336
Hemayati
M
,
Nikooee
E
,
Habibagahi
G
,
Niazi
A
,
Afzali
SF
2023
New non-ureolytic heterotrophic microbial induced carbonate precipitation for suppression of sand dune wind erosion
Scientific Reports
13
Hong
CY
,
Muda
K
,
Basri
HF
, et al
2023
Discovering research evolution and emerging trends in ammonium wastewater treatment technologies: a bibliometric analysis
Environment Development and Sustainability
Hu
L
,
Wang
H
,
Xu
P
,
Zhang
Y
2021
Biomineralization of hypersaline produced water using microbially induced calcite precipitation
Water Research
190
6
116753
Huang
W
,
Chen
Z
,
Liu
H
,
Wang
H
,
Wei
Z
2024
Microbial induced carbonate precipitation for cadmium removal in flue gas from sludge incineration
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
12
6
116753
Jain
S
,
Fang
C
,
Achal
V
2021
A critical review on microbial carbonate precipitation via denitrification process in building materials
Bioengineered
12
7529
-
7551
Jiang
NJ
,
Yoshioka
H
,
Yamamoto
K
,
Soga
K
2016
Ureolytic activities of a urease-producing bacterium and purified urease enzyme in the anoxic condition: implication for subseafloor sand production control by microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP)
Ecological Engineering
90
96
-
104
Jin
YF
,
Yin
ZY
,
Zhou
WH
,
Shao
JF
2019
Bayesian model selection for sand with generalization ability evaluation
International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics
43
2305
-
2327
Jin
C
,
Liu
H
,
Guo
M
,
Wang
Y
,
Zhu
J
2022
Experimental study on tailings cementation by MICP technique with immersion curing
PLoS One
17
Jong
SC
,
Ong
DEL
,
Oh
E
2021
State-of-the-art review of geotechnical-driven artificial intelligence techniques in underground soil–structure interaction
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
113
article 103946
Jong
SC
,
Ong
DEL
,
Oh
E
2022
A novel Bayesian inference method for predicting optimum strength gain in sustainable geomaterials for greener construction
Construction and Building Materials
344
article 128255
Justo-Reinoso
I
,
Heath
A
,
Gebhard
S
,
Paine
K
2021
Aerobic non-ureolytic bacteria-based self-healing cementitious composites: a comprehensive review
Journal of Building Engineering
42
Justo-Reinoso
I
,
Arena
N
,
Reeksting
BJ
,
Gebhard
S
,
Paine
K
2023
Bacteria-based self-healing concrete – a life cycle assessment perspective
Developments in the Built Environment
16
Kim
G
,
Youn
H
2016
Microbially induced calcite precipitation employing environmental isolates
Materials
9
Kirkland
CM
,
Zanetti
S
,
Grunewald
E
, et al
2017
Detecting microbially induced calcite precipitation in a model well-bore using downhole low-field NMR
Environmental Science and Technology
51
1537
-
1543
Konstantinou
C
,
Wang
Y
2023
Unlocking the potential of microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP) for hydrological applications: a review of opportunities, challenges, and environmental considerations
Hydrology
10
Kumari
D
,
Pan
X
,
Lee
DJ
,
Achal
V
2014
Immobilization of cadmium in soil by microbially induced carbonate precipitation with Exiguobacterium undae at low temperature
International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation
94
98
-
102
Kumpulainen
M
,
Seppänen
M
2022
Combining Web of Science and Scopus datasets in citation-based literature study
Scientometrics
127
10
5613
-
5631
Kwon
HJ
,
Chang
BS
,
Choi
BY
,
Park
KH
,
Jeong
SH
2000
Applications of MICP source for next generation photomask process
Proceedings of SPIE
4066
218
-
225
Kwon
P
,
Karmacharya
D
,
Kavazanjian
E
,
Zapata
CE
,
Van Paassen
LA
2024
Microbial-induced desaturation and precipitation in stratified soils with fine sand and silt layers
Acta Geotechnica
Lala
AMS
,
El-Sayed
NAA
2015
Effect of pore framework and radius of pore throats on permeability estimation
Journal of African Earth Sciences
110
64
-
74
Lee
M
,
Gomez
MG
2024
Removal of ammonium by-products produced during biocementation soil improvement using rinse injection strategies
Soil Use and Management
40
1
Lee
YS
,
Kim
HJ
,
Park
W
2017
Non-ureolytic calcium carbonate precipitation by Lysinibacillus sp. YS11 isolated from the rhizosphere of Miscanthus sacchariflorus
Journal of Microbiology
55
440
-
447
Leydesdorff
L
,
Carley
S
,
Rafols
I
2013
Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science categories
Scientometrics
94
2
589
-
593
Li
M
,
Guo
H
,
Cheng
X
2011
Application of response surface methodology for carbonate precipitation production induced by a mutant strain of Sporosarcina pasteurii
Geo-Frontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering
Han
K
,
Alzamora
DE
American Society of Civil Engineers
Reston, VA, USA
4079
-
4088
Li
M
,
Fang
C
,
Kawasaki
S
,
Achal
V
2018a
Fly ash incorporated with biocement to improve strength of expansive soil
Scientific Reports
8
Li
C
,
Yao
D
,
Liu
S
, et al
2018b
Improvement of geomechanical properties of bio-remediated aeolian sand
Geomicrobiology Journal
35
132
-
140
Liu
J
,
Su
J
,
Ali
A
,
Wang
Z
,
Zhang
R
2022
Potential of a novel facultative anaerobic denitrifying Cupriavidus sp. W12 to remove fluoride and calcium through calcium bioprecipitation
Journal of Hazardous Materials
423
Martinez
BC
,
Dejong
JT
,
Ginn
TR
, et al
2013
Experimental optimization of microbial-induced carbonate precipitation for soil improvement
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
139
587
-
598
Meng
H
,
Shu
S
,
Gao
Y
,
He
J
,
Wan
Y
2021
Kitchen waste for Sporosarcina pasteurii cultivation and its application in wind erosion control of desert soil via microbially induced carbonate precipitation
Acta Geotechnica
16
4045
-
4059
Min
J
,
Son
Y
,
Jang
I
,
Yi
C
,
Park
W
2024
Managing two simultaneous issues in concrete repair: healing microcracks and controlling pathogens
Construction and Building Materials
416
Minayeva
OB
,
Hopwood
JA
2002
Emission spectroscopy using a microfabricated inductively coupled plasma-on-a-chip: invited lecture
Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry
17
1103
-
1107
Montoya
BM
,
Dejong
JT
2013
Healing of biologically induced cemented sands
Géotechnique Letters
3
147
-
151
Montoya
BM
,
Dejong
JT
,
Boulanger
RW
, et al
2012
Liquefaction mitigation using microbial induced calcite precipitation
GeoCongress: 2012: State of the Art and Practice in Geotechnical Engineering
Hryciw
RD
,
Athanasopoulos-Zekkos
A
,
Yesiller
N
American Society of Civil Engineers
Reston, VA, USA
1918
-
1927
Mortensen
BM
,
Dejong
JT
2011
Strength and stiffness of MICP treated sand subjected to various stress paths
Geo-Frontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering
Han
K
,
Alzamora
DE
American Society of Civil Engineers
Reston, VA, USA
4012
-
4020
Mortensen
BM
,
Haber
MJ
,
Dejong
JT
,
Caslake
LF
,
Nelson
DC
2011
Effects of environmental factors on microbial induced calcium carbonate precipitation
Journal of Applied Microbiology
111
2
338
-
349
Muniz
DHF
,
Oliveira-Filho
EC
2023
Multivariate statistical analysis for water quality assessment: a review of research published between 2001 and 2020
Hydrology
10
10
article 196
O’Donnell
ST
,
Kavazanjian
E
2015
Stiffness and dilatancy improvements in uncemented sands treated through MICP
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
141
O’Donnell
ST
,
Rittmann
BE
,
Kavazanjian
E
2017a
MIDP: liquefaction mitigation via microbial denitrification as a two-stage process. I: Desaturation
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
143
O’Donnell
ST
,
Kavazanjian
E
,
Rittmann
BE
2017b
MIDP: liquefaction mitigation via microbial denitrification as a two-stage process. II: MICP
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
143
Omoregie
AI
,
Senian
N
,
Li
PY
, et al
2016
Ureolytic bacteria isolated from Sarawak limestone caves show high urease enzyme activity comparable to that of Sporosarcina pasteurii (DSM 33)
Malaysian Journal of Microbiology
12
463
-
470
Omoregie
AI
,
Khoshdelnezamiha
G
,
Senian
N
,
Ong
DEL
,
Nissom
PM
2017
Experimental optimisation of various cultural conditions on urease activity for isolated Sporosarcina pasteurii strains and evaluation of their biocement potentials
Ecological Engineering
109
65
-
75
Omoregie
AI
,
Ngu
LH
,
Ong
DEL
,
Nissom
PM
2019a
Low-cost cultivation of Sporosarcina pasteurii strain in food-grade yeast extract medium for microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) application
Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology
17
247
-
255
Omoregie
AI
,
Palombo
EA
,
Ong
DEL
,
Nissom
PM
2019b
Biocementation of sand by Sporosarcina pasteurii strain and technical-grade cementation reagents through surface percolation treatment method
Construction and Building Materials
228
Omoregie
AI
,
Palombo
EA
,
Nissom
PM
2021
Bioprecipitation of calcium carbonate mediated by ureolysis: a review
Environmental Engineering Research
26
Omoregie
AI
,
Muda
K
,
Ojuri
OO
, et al
2022
The global research trend on microbially induced carbonate precipitation during 2001–2021: a bibliometric review
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
29
60
89899
-
89922
Omoregie
AI
,
Muda
K
,
Steven
R
, et al
2023a
Insect frass as a substrate to stimulate native ureolytic bacteria for microbial-induced carbonate precipitation in soil biocementation
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery
Omoregie
AI
,
Muda
K
,
Ong
DEL
, et al
2023b
Soil bio-cementation treatment strategies: state-of-the-art review
Geotechnical Research
11
3
-
27
Omoregie
AI
,
Ouahbi
T
,
Ong
DEL
, et al
2024
Perspective of hydrodynamics in microbial-induced carbonate precipitation: a bibliometric analysis and review of research evolution
Hydrology
11
5
61
Pal
S
,
Tiwari
S
,
Puria
R
,
Nain
V
,
Prasad Pathak
R
2022
Impact of ureolytic and nonureolytic bacteria on self healing of artificial cracks in biofortified concrete
Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies
8
841
-
860
Pei
D
,
Liu
Z
,
Wu
W
,
Hu
B
2021
Transcriptome analyses reveal the utilization of nitrogen sources and related metabolic mechanisms of Sporosarcina pasteurii
PLoS One
16
Pham
VP
,
Nakano
A
,
Van Der Star
WRL
,
Heimovaara
TJ
,
Van Paassen
LA
2018
Applying MICP by denitrification in soils: a process analysis
Environmental Geotechnics
5
79
-
93
Phua
YJ
,
Røyne
A
2018
Bio-cementation through controlled dissolution and recrystallization of calcium carbonate
Construction and Building Materials
167
Porter
H
,
Mukherjee
A
,
Tuladhar
R
,
Dhami
NK
2021
Life cycle assessment of biocement: an emerging sustainable solution?
Sustainability
13
24
13878
Purba
LDA
,
Khudzari
JM
,
Iwamoto
K
, et al
2022
Discovering future research trends of aerobic granular sludge using bibliometric approach
Journal of Environmental Management
303
article 114150
Qi
XH
,
Zhou
WH
2017
An efficient probabilistic back-analysis method for braced excavations using wall deflection data at multiple points
Computers and Geotechnics
85
186
-
198
Ramakrishnan
V
,
Panchalan
RK
,
Bang
SS
2005
Improvement of concrete durability by bacterial mineral precipitation
Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Fracture 2005, ICF11
Turin, Italy
2095
-
2100
Raveh-Amit
H
,
Tsesarsky
M
2020
Biostimulation in desert soils for microbial-induced calcite precipitation
Applied Sciences
10
Raveh-Amit
H
,
Gruber
A
,
Abramov
K
,
Tsesarsky
M
2024
Mitigation of aeolian erosion of loess soil by bio-stimulated microbial induced calcite precipitation
Catena
237
Reeksting
BJ
,
Hoffmann
TD
,
Tan
L
,
Paine
K
,
Gebhard
S
2020
In-depth profiling of calcite precipitation by environmental bacteria reveals fundamental mechanistic differences with relevance to application
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
86
Revil
A
2007
Comment on ‘Permeability prediction from MICP and NMR data using an electrokinetic approach’ (P. W. J. Glover, I. I. Zadjali, and K. A. Frew, 2006, Geophysics, 71, no. 4, F49–F60)
Geophysics
72
4
X3
-
X4
Sadjadi
M
,
Nikooee
E
,
Habibagahi
G
2014
Biological treatment of swelling soils using microbial calcite precipitation
Unsaturated Soils: Research and Applications
Khalili
N
,
Russell
AR
,
Khoshghalb
A
CRC Press
Boca Raton, FL, USA
917
-
922
Sarda
D
,
Choonia
HS
,
Sarode
DD
,
Lele
SS
2009
Biocalcification by Bacillus pasteurii urease: a novel application
Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology
36
1111
-
1115
Sasaki
T
,
Kuwano
R
2016
Undrained cyclic triaxial testing on sand with non-plastic fines content cemented with microbially induced CaCO3
Soils and Foundations
56
485
-
495
Shaheen
N
,
Jalil
A
,
Adnan
F
,
Arsalan Khushnood
R
2021
Isolation of alkaliphilic calcifying bacteria and their feasibility for enhanced CaCO3 precipitation in bio-based cementitious composites
Microbial Biotechnology
14
1044
-
1059
Shahid
S
2022
Review on biogeotechnics for soil treatment
In
Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering (CSEE’22)
El Naggar
H
,
Barros
J
,
Cachim
P
Avestia Publishing
Ottawa, ON, Canada
paper no. ICGRE 142-1
Sharma
M
2024
Potential of bio-mediated calcite precipitation methods for heavy metal immobilization and strength enhancement of contaminated soils
Indian Geotechnical Journal
Shougrakpam
S
,
Trivedi
A
2018
Formation of biomineralized calcium carbonate precipitation and its potential to strengthen loose sandy soils
Proceedings of China–Europe Conference on Geotechnical Engineering
Wu
W
,
Yu
H
Springer
Cham, Switzerland
1
830
-
833
Silva
FB
,
Boon
N
,
De Belie
N
,
Verstraete
W
2015
Industrial application of biological self-healing concrete: challenges and economical feasibility
Journal of Commercial Biotechnology
21
31
-
38
Singh
VK
,
Singh
P
,
Karmakar
M
,
Leta
J
,
Mayr
P
2021
The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: a comparative analysis
Scientometrics
126
5113
-
5142
Sonmez
M
,
Erşan
2022
Production and compatibility assessment of denitrifying biogranules tailored for self-healing concrete applications
Cement and Concrete Composites
126
Tan
L
,
Reeksting
B
,
Justo-Reinoso
I
, et al
2023a
The effect of oxygen and water on the provision of crack closure in bacteria-based self-healing cementitious composites
Cement and Concrete Composites
142
105201
Tan
L
,
Xu
J
,
Wei
Y
,
Han
J
,
Yao
W
2023b
Aerobic non-ureolytic bacteria-based self-healing cementitious composites: a novel approach without added calcium precursor
Engineering Research Express
5
3
article 035006
Tang
S
,
Wang
Y
2024
The optimized microbial-induced calcium carbonate precipitation process to fabricate underwater superoleophobic mesh for efficient oil–water separation
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
12
1
1118055
Tsesarsky
M
,
Gat
D
,
Ronen
Z
2018
Biological aspects of microbial-induced calcite precipitation
Environmental Geotechnics
5
69
-
78
Van Der Star
WRL
,
Taher
E
,
Harkes
MP
, et al
2010
Use of waste streams and microbes for in situ transformation of sand into sandstone
Geotechnical Society of Singapore – International Symposium on Ground Improvement Technologies and Case Histories, ISGI’09
Geotechnical Society of Singapore
Singapore
177
-
182
Van Paassen
LA
,
Ghose
R
,
Van Der Linden
TJM
,
Van Der Star
WRL
,
Van Loosdrecht
MCM
2010a
Quantifying biomediated ground improvement by ureolysis: large-scale biogrout experiment
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
136
1721
-
1728
Van Paassen
LA
,
Daza
CM
,
Staal
M
, et al
2010b
Potential soil reinforcement by biological denitrification
Ecological Engineering
36
168
-
175
Van Paassen
LA
,
Van Hemert
WJ
,
Van Der Star
WRL
,
Van Zwieten
G
,
Van Baalen
L
2012
Direct shear strength of biologically cemented gravel
GeoCongress 2012: State of the Art and Practice in Geotechnical Engineering
Hryciw
RD
,
Athanasopoulos-Zekkos
A
,
Yesiller
N
American Society of Civil Engineers
Reston, VA, USA
968
-
977
Velpuri
NVP
,
Yu
X
,
Lee
HI
,
Chang
WS
2016
Influence factors for microbial-induced calcite precipitation in sands
Geo-China 2016: Innovative and Sustainable Use of Geomaterials and Geosystems
Cheng
W
,
Wu
JY
American Society of Civil Engineers
Reston, VA, USA
44
-
52
Visser
M
,
van Eck
NJ
,
Waltman
L
2021
Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic
Quantitative Science Studies
2
1
20
-
41
Wang
M
,
Wu
S
,
Guo
J
, et al
2019
Immobilization of cadmium by hydroxyapatite converted from microbial precipitated calcite
Journal of Hazardous Materials
366
684
-
693
Wang
Z
,
Su
J
,
Ali
A
, et al
2021
Microbially induced calcium precipitation based simultaneous removal of fluoride, nitrate, and calcium by Pseudomonas sp. WZ39: mechanisms and nucleation pathways
Journal of Hazardous Materials
416
21
125914
Wang
Z
,
Su
J
,
Ali
A
, et al
2022
Synergistic removal of fluoride from groundwater by seed crystals and bacteria based on microbially induced calcium precipitation
Science of the Total Environment
806
Whiffin
VS
,
Van Passen
LA
,
Harkes
MP
2007
Microbial carbonate precipitation as a soil improvement technique
Geomicrobiology Journal
24
417
-
423
Whitaker
JM
,
Vanapalli
S
,
Fortin
D
2018
Improving the strength of sandy soils via ureolytic CaCO3 solidification by Sporosarcina ureae
Biogeosciences
15
14
4367
-
4380
Wu
J
,
Wang
XB
,
Wang
HF
,
Zeng
RJ
2017
Microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation driven by ureolysis to enhance oil recovery
RSC Advances
7
37382
-
37391
Xiao
G
,
Zhang
J
,
Cheng
X
2023a
Review on the application of biogeotechnology in the restoration of masonry structures
Geomicrobiology Journal
40
719
-
732
Xiao
P
,
Liu
H
,
Shi
J
, et al
2023b
Dynamic responses of calcareous foundation reinforced by microbially induced calcite precipitation
Yantu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
45
1303
-
1313
Xu
J
,
Yao
W
,
Jiang
Z
2014
Non-ureolytic bacterial carbonate precipitation as a surface treatment strategy on cementitious materials
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
26
983
-
991
Yang
L
,
Feng
X
,
Sun
Y
2019
Predicting the Young’s modulus of granites using the Bayesian model selection approach
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
78
5
3413
-
3423
Yang
H
,
Peng
J
,
Li
J
,
Xie
G
2020
MICP-reinforced soil under three-dimensional grout injection condition
Global Nest Journal
22
484
-
491
Yin
T
,
Lin
H
,
Dong
Y
, et al
2021
A novel constructed carbonate-mineralized functional bacterial consortium for high-efficiency cadmium biomineralization
Journal of Hazardous Materials
401
Yoosathaporn
S
,
Tiangburanatham
P
,
Bovonsombut
S
,
Chaipanich
A
,
Pathom-Aree
W
2016
A cost effective cultivation medium for biocalcification of Bacillus pasteurii KCTC 3558 and its effect on cement cubes properties
Microbiological Research
186–187
132
-
138
Yu
T
,
Souli
H
,
Péchaud
Y
,
Fleureau
JM
2022
Optimizing protocols for microbial induced calcite precipitation (MICP) for soil improvement – a review
European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering
26
2218
-
2233
Zango
MU
,
Kassim
KA
,
Mohammed
AS
2018
Bio-desaturation and bio-sealing techniques for mitigation of soil liquefaction: a review
MATEC Web of Conferences
250
article 01018
Zhang
K
,
Tang
CS
,
Jiang
NJ
, et al
2023
Microbial-induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) technology: a review on the fundamentals and engineering applications
Environmental Earth Sciences
82
Zhao
Y
,
Wang
Q
,
Yuan
M
, et al
2022
The effect of MICP on physical and mechanical properties of silt with different fine particle content and pore ratio
Applied Sciences
12
1
139
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal