The traditional critical incident technique (CIT) and variants of the same have frequently been applied in service research for several decades. The technique has often been used to capture data on and analyse both negative and positive critical incidents. While one technique displays hosts of critical incidents in benchmark‐type series (SIT), another variant describes the dynamism in one discrete critical incident and a third the dynamism of the configuration of critical incidents (SPAT). In this article the different variants are discussed in relation to psychological theory focusing on the concepts of time, history and memory. To be able to analyse the criticality from the individual customer’s perspective, we argue that one must understand the significance of critical incidents in the light of human memory mechanisms and judgement processes. The discussion forms the basis for suggesting a new, tentative framework for analysing the criticality of critical incidents. We call this criticality critical incident technique (CCIT).
Article navigation
1 August 2001
This article was originally published in
International Journal of Service Industry Management
Conceptual Paper|
August 01 2001
Critical incident techniques: Towards a framework for analysing the criticality of critical incidents Available to Purchase
Bo Edvardsson;
Bo Edvardsson
Service Research Center, Karlstad University, Sweden
Search for other works by this author on:
Inger Roos
Inger Roos
Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration, Department of Marketing and Corporate Geography, CERS, Center for Relationship Marketing and Service Management, Helsinki, Finland
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6704
Print ISSN: 0956-4233
© MCB UP Limited
2001
International Journal of Service Industry Management (2001) 12 (3): 251–268.
Citation
Edvardsson B, Roos I (2001), "Critical incident techniques: Towards a framework for analysing the criticality of critical incidents". International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 12 No. 3 pp. 251–268, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005520
Download citation file:
4,419
Views
Suggested Reading
Who’s responsible? Representatives’ autonomy alters customers’ emotion and repurchase intentions toward organizations
Journal of Consumer Marketing (January,2019)
Determinants of trust in a service provider: the moderating role of length of relationship
Journal of Services Marketing (February,2002)
Gratitude in relationship marketing: Theoretical development and directions for future research
European Journal of Marketing (February,2014)
Implementing, monitoring and measuring a programme of relationship marketing
Marketing Intelligence & Planning (September,1999)
Building customer relationships: an inventory of service providers’ objectives and practices
Marketing Intelligence & Planning (November,2001)
Related Chapters
Service Encounter-Based
Knowledge Management in Tourism: Policy and Governance Applications
Leveraging Artificial Intelligent (AI) for Human-Mimic Tech in Marketing 5.0
Marketing 5.0: The Role of Human-Mimicking Technology
Mimicking Technologies in Retail: Facilitating and Transforming Customer Retail Experience
Marketing 5.0: The Role of Human-Mimicking Technology
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
