Purpose – The purpose of this article is to explore the relationship between teleworking adoption, workplace flexibility, and firm performance. Design/methodology/approach – Empirical survey of a representative sample of 479 small‐ and medium‐sized firms. Data gathered through interviews with company managers using a structured questionnaire. A t‐test used to analyse the mean differences of flexibility dimensions between companies, and a regression analysis used to study the impact of teleworking and other flexible workplace practices on firm performance. Findings – Firm performance is positively related to the use of teleworking, flexitime, contingent work and spatial decentralisation. Teleworking firms use more flexitime, have more employees involved in job design and planning, are more intensively managed by results, and use more variable compensation. The relationship of teleworking and external workplace flexibility is not so conclusive. Measures of external flexibility like subcontracting or contingent work are not associated with teleworking but spatial decentralisation is positively associated. Research limitations/implications – A limitation of this research is the measurement of flexibility at the firm level and the use of cross‐sectional data. To the extent that organisations may obtain functional and numerical flexibility by means of their relations to other organisations in networks, the most appropriate unit of analysis may be the network which it has implications for future longitudinal studies. Practical implications – Flexibility is a source of competitive advantage. Enhancing flexibility may be costly in the short run, but it gets easier over time. Firms become more flexible because their managers emphasise the importance of flexibility and because they practice being flexible. A self‐reinforcing process then begins. The relationships between the different forms of flexibility are important to understand the interaction between the dynamic control capacity of management and the responsiveness of the organisation. Originality/value – The article analyses the relationship between teleworking adoption and other flexibility dimensions.
Article navigation
2 January 2007
Research Article|
January 02 2007
Teleworking and workplace flexibility: a study of impact on firm performance Available to Purchase
Angel Martínez Sánchez;
Angel Martínez Sánchez
University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
Search for other works by this author on:
Manuela Pérez Pérez;
Manuela Pérez Pérez
University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
Search for other works by this author on:
Pilar de Luis Carnicer;
Pilar de Luis Carnicer
University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
Search for other works by this author on:
Maria José Vela Jiménez
Maria José Vela Jiménez
University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6933
Print ISSN: 0048-3486
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
2007
Personnel Review (2007) 36 (1): 42–64.
Citation
Martínez Sánchez A, Pérez Pérez M, de Luis Carnicer P, José Vela Jiménez M (2007), "Teleworking and workplace flexibility: a study of impact on firm performance". Personnel Review, Vol. 36 No. 1 pp. 42–64, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480710716713
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
AT&T adds business continuity to the long list of teleworks advantages
Human Resource Management International Digest (October,2006)
Contingent worker and innovation performance in electronics manufacturing service industry
Chinese Management Studies (August,2019)
Flexibility practices, wages and productivity: evidence from Norway
Personnel Review (July,2009)
A workstyle revolution? A survey of flexible employment practices
Leadership & Organization Development Journal (November,1999)
Managerial perceptions of workplace flexibility and firm performance
International Journal of Operations & Production Management (June,2007)
Related Chapters
Issues that Impact Academic Stress when Working Remotely Under COVID-19: Scale Reliability
Research in Administrative Sciences Under COVID-19
Coopetition and Knowledge Dynamics: Knowledge Creation and Management for Growth
Global Opportunities for Entrepreneurial Growth: Coopetition and Knowledge Dynamics within and across Firms
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the European Union Economy, Energy and Environment
COVID-19 and Public Policy
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
