Anyone who has been in regular contact with the media during the last 10 years must have been impressed by the amount of information and interest in health and the stresses of modern life. Much of the attention has been centred on the role of work in creating stress and its possible contribution to major illnesses such as heart disease, stomach ulcers and hypertension. This interest has been stimulated by an ever growing amount of research into stress at work. Friedman and Rosenman in California have carried out many large scale studies of the role of behaviour/personality in causing heart disease. This lead to a semi‐popular book called A‐Type Behavior and your Heart. Three large surveys have been reported in the last few years: Caplan et al. carried out a survey of 2,300 persons from 23 different occupations for the US National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health. They collected data on perceived stressors at work, perceived strain and perceived supports from inside and outside the organisation. Physiological measures were taken from a sub‐sample of 390 The results are very complex but the most stressed persons were in occupations which involve tasks that are simple but inescapable such as in machine‐minding. Such jobs are low in status and the strain is possibly exacerbated by lack of support from both inside and outside the organisation. Zaleznik et al. studied over 2,000 managers and supervisors from a large Canadian Corporation. Pearlin and Schooler conducted a survey of 2,600 persons for the National Institute of Mental Health. As well as exploring the nature of the stresses and strains experienced by these people the authors asked about the different kinds of strategies they used to cope with their problems. Four different problem areas were explored: marital, child‐rearing, economic and work. It was found that the people with a greater range of coping strategies felt less strained except in the area of work. The authors suggested that this was because the in dividual person can do little to remove the stresses at work since they are inherent in the system. Coping with work problems, they argue, needs to be done more at the level of the system.
Article navigation
1 January 1979
Review Article|
January 01 1979
Managing Illness at Work
Roy L. Payne;
Roy L. Payne
MRC Social and Applied Psychology Unit, University of Sheffield
Search for other works by this author on:
Tanya Arroba
Tanya Arroba
MRC Social and Applied Psychology Unit, University of Sheffield
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6933
Print ISSN: 0048-3486
© MCB UP Limited
1979
Personnel Review (1979) 8 (1): 31–39.
Citation
Payne RL, Arroba T (1979), "Managing Illness at Work". Personnel Review, Vol. 8 No. 1 pp. 31–39, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb055375
Download citation file:
143
Views
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Organisational Issues in Stress Research
Journal of Managerial Psychology (January,1986)
Health of caregiver-employees in Canada: Determining the value of caregiver-friendly workplace policies and social support
International Journal of Workplace Health Management (October,2018)
An examination of academic and occupational stress in the USA
International Journal of Educational Management (February,1997)
Thinking differently about talent development: An interview with Janice Caplan, author of Strategic Talent Development
Human Resource Management International Digest (March,2014)
Strategic responses to a high‐turbulent environment: The case of the French public hospitals
International Journal of Public Sector Management (June,2006)
Related Chapters
Dividuals, Individuals, or Possessive Individuals?: Recent Transformations of North Mekeo Commoditization, Personhood, and Sociality
Engaging with Capitalism: Cases from Oceania
Chapter 6 Innovations and Productivity: An Empirical Investigation in Dutch Hospital Industry
Evaluating Hospital Policy and Performance: Contributions from Hospital Policy and Productivity Research
Why Hayek Matters: The Epistemic Dimension of Comparative Institutional Analysis
Revisiting Hayek’s Political Economy
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
