Skip to article sections
Purpose

Hybrid and remote work models have reshaped how organizations operate, but one of their most overlooked consequences is the erosion of informal learning. Learning has never been confined to classrooms or e-modules; it emerges in spontaneous moments, corridor conversations, mentoring after meetings, or observing colleagues in action. This paper explores how hybrid work unintentionally disrupts these organic learning structures and why this matters for employee development, organizational culture, and long-term capability building.

Design/methodology/approach

Drawing on recent research, including qualitative insights from interviews and practitioner observations, the paper examines how hybrid work arrangements have altered the natural learning dynamics once fostered by in-person collaboration. It synthesizes academic and practical evidence to identify emerging learning gaps and proposes actionable responses for learning and development (L&D) professionals.

Findings

The study finds that hybrid work models have weakened organic learning structures such as unscripted coaching, mentoring, and observation-based development. Overreliance on pre-existing relationships disadvantages new hires, while reduced social interaction erodes cultural transmission and limits exposure-based learning. Although productivity remains stable, developmental experiences and learning equity have declined, particularly among early-career employees.

Research limitations/implications

As a practitioner-oriented paper, the analysis is conceptual and based on applied insights rather than primary empirical research. Further studies could empirically test how intentional design interventions in hybrid settings restore informal learning and developmental equity.

Practical implications

The paper outlines five strategies for L&D professionals to redesign hybrid work environments for learning effectiveness: reimagining the office as a learning space, ensuring developmental equity, reigniting social learning, using hybrid schedules intentionally, and embedding learning into the performance culture. These recommendations provide a practical framework for fostering connection, observation, and informal development in hybrid organizations. They also emphasize that hybrid models, without intentional design, replicate few of the developmental benefits the office once provided.

Originality/value

Ultimately, organizations must rethink learning for the new world of work. The challenge is not only to deliver training but to redesign learning ecosystems where connection, observation, and informal development are nurtured. With intentional design, hybrid models can move beyond efficiency to become enablers of learning, growth, and long-term capability.

Learning doesn’t just happen in training rooms or webinars. It happens in corridors, after meetings, through overheard conversations and casual mentoring. But today’s hybrid and remote work models are quietly eroding these everyday learning moments without us even noticing.

The global experiment in remote work began out of necessity. At first, it seemed like a success. Productivity held steady, employees enjoyed greater flexibility, and companies downsized real estate. But five years on, the cracks are beginning to show.

In our book In Praise of the Office (Cappelli and Nehmeh, 2025), we explored the full impact of remote and hybrid work models, not just on performance and culture, but also on something often overlooked: Learning and Development (L&D).

The office is more than a physical location. It acts as an engine for learning, especially the informal, spontaneous kind that shapes behavior, builds confidence, and accelerates career development. When that structure dissolved, so too did the organic learning structures embedded in everyday office life.

Hybrid work has also sparked experimentation in new forms of learning. Digital platforms, virtual mentoring, and social learning networks now offer new ways to connect and share knowledge. While they may not replicate spontaneous encounters, they represent emerging mechanisms for learning in the digital era.

Peter Cappelli with Jasmine Wu at the University of Texas conducted interviews and focus groups with 720 participants across three continents working in hybrid models (Cappelli and Wu, 2025). A recurring theme emerged: people had underestimated the role the office played in facilitating learning. It wasn’t just a place for scheduled work or formal training. It served as a daily learning environment, full of unplanned coaching, observation-based learning, and cultural immersion.

Unscripted coaching, modeled behavior, and casual advice, these daily interactions helped employees learn how decisions were made, how influence worked, and what behaviors were rewarded. Walking past someone’s desk or overhearing how a senior handled a challenge contributed to professional development.

Those learning moments didn’t survive the transition to hybrid. Quick questions became delayed Slack messages, hallway chats disappeared. This was especially evident for new hires, unsure whom to reach out to, struggled most. Collaboration became scheduled rather than spontaneous, flattening opportunities for informal learning.

Yet, evidence suggests digital tools can recreate some proximity-like effects. “Digital mirroring,” observing colleagues through shared virtual workspaces, can replicate cues for learning. Virtual coworking sessions, or “always-on” audio channels can foster micro-learning moments reminiscent of in-office exchanges. These findings invite a more nuanced perspective: while the loss of physical proximity matters, digital proximity, when purposefully engineered, can partially bridge the gap (Jermann et al., 2001).

Hybrid is often seen as the preferred choice for employees and employers, but it comes with its own challenges. One of the most revealing findings from the above-mentioned research was that many employees, particularly early-career professionals, felt increasingly disconnected from developmental pathways. While they were still completing tasks, they weren’t gaining the broader skills, exposure, or relationships that support long-term development.

Without intentional design, hybrid models replicate few of the organic learning mechanisms the office once provided.

Several themes emerged across organizations:

  • Overreliance on Pre-Pandemic Relationships: Employees were still tapping into connections built before remote work began. New hires, lacking these networks, required more time to adjust and contribute, had reduced visibility, and slower integration.

  • Silent suffering among juniors: Without opportunities to observe others or ask informal (even silly) questions, newer employees experienced steeper learning curves.

  • Erosion of mentorship: Mentoring used to happen organically, in hallways, after meetings, during lunch. Without those moments, even organizations with formal mentorship programs saw relationships weaken. Many junior employees reported feeling unsupported, even in organizations that had formal mentorship programs in place.

  • Loss of cultural transmission: New employees often struggled to grasp organizational norms, values, and expectations. Without witnessing how experienced colleagues navigated meetings, handled conflict, or built influence, many felt uncertain about what was appropriate or effective. Culture, once absorbed through observation, became something that had to be explained, and often wasn’t.

Hybrid work is itself isn’t the problem, it’s the lack of intentional design. Digital tools can extend learning beyond geography, making development more inclusive and equitable (Navas-Bonilla et al., 2025). Concepts like job and relational crafting, where employees actively shape their roles and relationships, show how individuals can still create learning opportunities in digital environments (Wrzesniewski and Dutton, 2001).

Learning doesn’t just happen in classrooms or e-modules. A huge chunk of it, especially for junior employees, happens through exposure − watching meetings unfold, joining impromptu brainstorms, or listening to hallway conversations.

Traditional L&D, such as delivering workshops, rolling out e-learning, managing learning pathways are no longer enough. L&D professionals must rebuild the environments where learning occurs.

Here are five practical takeaways for L&D professionals:

  1. Reimagine the Office as a Learning Environment: Stop viewing the office as just a workspace, it’s a developmental space. It enables real-time feedback, peer learning, and spontaneous collaboration.

L&D can partner with leaders to design physical spaces that encourage learning: open areas for whiteboarding, drop-in mentoring, and peer discussions. In-office days can be used strategically for live feedback, or informal talks with senior leaders.

Hybrid-friendly ideas include virtual “learning lounges” or informal digital cafés that simulate corridor conversations and encouraging cross-team mentoring in a hybrid context:

  1. Prioritize Developmental Equity: Hybrid work tends to favor experienced, well-connected employees while disadvantaging newcomers or underrepresented groups.

Some tactics to mitigate this is to assign mentors, or learning champions to new hires, track learning access by tenure, and use cohort-based onboarding with social elements and in-person anchor days when possible.

Complement in-person onboarding with digital buddy systems or asynchronous mentoring to ensure everyone gets equal exposure.

  1. Bring Back Social Learning: Most learning is relational. It happens in conversation, observation, and shared problem-solving. Yet digital learning has become solitary and transactional.

To reignite social learning: reintroduce cross-functional job shadowing, launch facilitated discussion groups and pair learners for collaborative reflection after training sessions. Use collaborative tools like Miro or Teams for live learning or host “virtual observation days.” These design choices rebuild the connective tissue that keeps learning alive.

  1. Use Hybrid Schedules Intentionally: Encourage teams to align in-office days to maximize interaction. L&D can coordinate with HR to schedule team anchor days around learning-intensive activities, mentorship, onboarding, or promotion moments.

Learning opportunities shouldn’t be left to chance; shared dashboards, mentoring rotations, and online retrospectives can reinforce continuous development between physical meetups.

  1. Embed Learning into Performance Culture: The erosion of informal learning means formal systems must pick up the slack. Learning needs to be visible and valued, a core part of performance. Coaching, feedback, and development discussions must become deliberate acts, not passive outcomes.

Train managers to create learning moments, include mentoring in performance reviews and reinforce that development is a shared responsibility

Digital feedback and recognition platforms can help make informal learning visible even across distance, ensuring that coaching and mentoring are embedded into both digital and in-person workflows.

In In Praise of the Office, we argue that organizations didn’t fully realize what the office enabled, until it was gone. L&D teams are now at a similar crossroads. They need to rethink what a learning culture looks like when the traditional office is no longer a given. Start by asking:

  • What kind of learning do we truly value?

  • Where does that learning currently happen, or fail to happen?

  • How can we intentionally recreate the conditions that enable meaningful development?

The office, used purposefully, remains a powerful platform for human connection and growth.

But hybrid and digital workspaces, when designed with equal intentionality, can extend learning’s reach, democratize access, and redefine knowledge-sharing. The future of learning lies not in returning to the past, but in blending the best of both worlds.

As we navigate the hybrid future, L&D teams must become designers of learning ecosystems, advocates for intentional presence, and champions of informal development. Because learning doesn’t just happen. It must be nurtured, and it must be designed with intention.

Cappelli
,
P.
and
Nehmeh
,
R.
(
2025
),
In Praise of the Office: The Limits to Hybrid and Remote Work
,
Wharton School Press
,
Philadelphia, PA
.
Cappelli
,
P.
and
Wu
,
J.Y.
(
2025
), “
How remote work alters the tasks of office work
”,
available at:
Link to How remote work alters the tasks of office workLink to the cited article. (
accessed
16 October 2025).
Jermann
,
P.
,
Soller
,
A.
and
Muhlenbrock
,
M.
(
2001
), “
From mirroring to guiding: a review of state of the art technology for supporting collaborative learning
”,
Paper presented at the Euro Computer Supported Collaborative Learning
,
March 22-24, 2001
,
Maastricht, NL
.
Navas-Bonilla
,
C.
,
Guerra-Arango
,
J.
,
Oviedo-Guado
,
D.
and
Murillo-Noriego
,
D.
(
2025
), “
Inclusive education through technology: a systematic review of types, tools, and characteristics
”,
available at:
Link to Inclusive education through technology: a systematic review of types, tools, and characteristicsLink to the cited article. (
accessed
11 November 2025)
Wrzesniewski
,
A.
and
Dutton
,
J.E.
(
2001
), “
Crafting a job: revisioning employees as active crafters of their work
”,
The Academy of Management Review
, Vol.
26
No.
2
, pp.
179
-
201
.
Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence maybe seen at Link to the terms of the CC BY 4.0 licenceLink to the terms of the CC BY 4.0 licence.

Data & Figures

Supplements

References

Cappelli
,
P.
and
Nehmeh
,
R.
(
2025
),
In Praise of the Office: The Limits to Hybrid and Remote Work
,
Wharton School Press
,
Philadelphia, PA
.
Cappelli
,
P.
and
Wu
,
J.Y.
(
2025
), “
How remote work alters the tasks of office work
”,
available at:
Link to How remote work alters the tasks of office workLink to the cited article. (
accessed
16 October 2025).
Jermann
,
P.
,
Soller
,
A.
and
Muhlenbrock
,
M.
(
2001
), “
From mirroring to guiding: a review of state of the art technology for supporting collaborative learning
”,
Paper presented at the Euro Computer Supported Collaborative Learning
,
March 22-24, 2001
,
Maastricht, NL
.
Navas-Bonilla
,
C.
,
Guerra-Arango
,
J.
,
Oviedo-Guado
,
D.
and
Murillo-Noriego
,
D.
(
2025
), “
Inclusive education through technology: a systematic review of types, tools, and characteristics
”,
available at:
Link to Inclusive education through technology: a systematic review of types, tools, and characteristicsLink to the cited article. (
accessed
11 November 2025)
Wrzesniewski
,
A.
and
Dutton
,
J.E.
(
2001
), “
Crafting a job: revisioning employees as active crafters of their work
”,
The Academy of Management Review
, Vol.
26
No.
2
, pp.
179
-
201
.

Languages

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options