This article presents an analytical method for quantifying Heskett’s “Strategic service vision”. The model, which is based on quality function deployment (QFD), and benchmarking, starts with two matrices in series to relate market segments, service concepts, and various processes, as rows and columns of interconnected QFD matrices. In addition, analytic hierarchy process (AHP), a decision‐making tool, is used to determine the intensity of the relationship between the row and column variables of each matrix, while analytic network process (ANP), an extension of AHP, is used to determine the intensity of synergy effects among column variables. Finally, benchmarking is used to suggest potential breakthroughs in service delivery. Ultimately, the goal of these matrices and benchmarking is to add fine‐tuning and precision to an otherwise qualitative strategic decision making process. To demonstrate the applicability of our proposed model to service organizations we develop its basic concepts within the framework of a specific example serving as a background.
Article navigation
1 December 2001
This article was originally published in
International Journal of Service Industry Management
Research Article|
December 01 2001
An analytic model to quantify strategic service vision Available to Purchase
Fariborz Y. Partovi
Fariborz Y. Partovi
Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6704
Print ISSN: 0956-4233
© MCB UP Limited
2001
International Journal of Service Industry Management (2001) 12 (5): 476–499.
Citation
Partovi FY (2001), "An analytic model to quantify strategic service vision". International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 12 No. 5 pp. 476–499, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006094
Download citation file:
1,066
Views
Suggested Reading
An application of quality function deployment to improve the quality of teaching
International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management (June,1998)
Determining customer‐oriented technical importance ratings: an evaluative study
International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management (May,2005)
An integrated model for performance management of manufacturing units
Benchmarking: An International Journal (April,2011)
Integrating the Kano model, AHP and planning matrix: QFD application in library services
Library Management (May,2008)
Dynamic benchmarking methodology for quality function deployment
Benchmarking: An International Journal (March,2010)
Related Chapters
Quality Function Deployment (QFD)
Quality Management: Tools, Methods, and Standards
Enterprise, Leadership and Partnership in Leeds
Enterprising Places: Leadership and Governance Networks
Wildest Dreams
Swift Leadership: A Taylor-made Approach to Influence and Decision Making
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
