Examines and discusses the contribution to the analysis of HRM of those scholars who have sought to make use of the thought of Michel Foucault. Sympathetic to the achievements of Foucauldian studies but emphasising the different ways in which Foucault’s thought has been put to use, goes on to consider the critical debate that has subsequently emerged. An important objective is to offer a reading of Foucault that draws attention to certain features of his thought which appear to have been marginalised in recent debate. Against the critics and by rereading Foucault, the suggestion that “Foucauldianism” necessarily leads inter alia to a denial of the significance of legal and economic powers and relations in the employment relationship, to a postmodern indifference to forms of evidence and proof in analysis, is called into question. Accepting the plausibility of at least some of the criticisms levelled at Foucauldianism by the critics, goes on to argue that Foucauldians might equally benefit from revisiting Foucault. Argues in favour of the particular benefits of further reflection on the spirit of enquiry that animates Foucault’s project and his role as an engaged intellectual. The suggestion is that Foucauldians need to play a more active role in public debate, circulating their critical knowledge and analyses beyond the academy.
Article navigation
1 April 2002
Conceptual Paper|
April 01 2002
Foucault, Foucauldianism and human resource management
Ed Barratt
Ed Barratt
School of Management, Heriot‐Watt University, Edinburgh, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6933
Print ISSN: 0048-3486
© MCB UP Limited
2002
Personnel Review (2002) 31 (2): 189–204.
Citation
Barratt E (2002), "Foucault, Foucauldianism and human resource management". Personnel Review, Vol. 31 No. 2 pp. 189–204, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480210416865
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Personnel management in the public sector: Power, roles and relationships
Personnel Review (April,1996)
Getting into the Act: Who Decides about Corporate Strategy
Executive Development (June,1994)
The universal library report
Library Management (February,1996)
Gatekeepers influencing careers of Canadian public sector employees: views from managers and union employees
Journal of Management Development (October,2022)
Addressing the barriers of managing change
Management Development Review (June,1996)
Related Chapters
The Birth of Biocracy
Reinventing Hierarchy and Bureaucracy – from the Bureau to Network Organizations
Bureaucracy and Hierarchy – what Else!?
Reinventing Hierarchy and Bureaucracy – from the Bureau to Network Organizations
Micropolitics: A New Model of Status Hierarchies in Teams
Looking Back, Moving Forward: A Review of Group and Team-Based Research
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
